Abstract
Accurate, complete, and timely pathologic assessment of tissue obtained during colonoscopic cancer screening is the key to appropriate patient management. In addition to maintaining the highest standards within the pathology laboratory, optimal diagnostic pathology services require that pathologists, colonoscopists, endoscopy team members, and patient care team work in close concert. Before tissues get to the laboratory, there needs to be a plan for appropriate sampling and high fidelity specimen labeling (patient identification). In the laboratory, high volumes of biopsies must be processed in a timely and reliable manner. Subspecialty pathology leadership and professional laboratory staffing is critical. A quality assurance program will provide a basis for continuous improvement of the pathology support. Effective communication between the laboratory and the clinical services must be maintained before, during, and after the microscopic diagnosis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Francis DL, Prabhakar S, Sanderson SO. A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen-labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center. Am J Gastroent. 2009;104:972–5.
ASGI Standards of Practice Committee, Sharaf RN, Shergill AK, Odze RD, Krinsky ML, Fukami N, Jain R, et al. Endoscopic mucosal sampling. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:216–24.
Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives. Genet Med. 2009;11:35–41.
Al-Zafiri R, Gologan A, Galiatsatos P, Szilagyi A. Cytomegalovirus complicating inflammatory bowel disease: a 10-year experience in a community-based, university-affiliated hospital. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;8:230–9.
Casati B, Bjugn R. Structured electronic template for histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections: five-year follow-up shows sustainable long-term quality improvement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136(6):652–6.
Layfield LJ, Anderson GM. Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology, an 18-month experience. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:466–70.
Eaden JA, Abrams KR. Inter-observer variation between general and specialist gastrointestinal pathologists when grading dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. J Pathol. 2001;194:152–7.
O’Reilly PM, Burgart LJ, Vargo PM. High dose bisacodyl as part of a colonoscopy preparation may cause colon ischemia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:AB134.
Nakhleh R. What is quality in surgical pathology? J ClinPathol. 2006;59:669–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burgart, L., O’Reilly, P., Batts, K., Daniels, J., Dilworth, H., Sanderson, S. (2015). Role of Pathology in Quality of Colonoscopy. In: Shaukat, A., Allen, J. (eds) Colorectal Cancer Screening. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2333-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2333-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2332-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2333-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)