Skip to main content

Planned and Emergent Strategy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Since the 1970s, there has been an ongoing debate in the literature as to the most effective means of formulating strategy. One camp has touted the merits of formal, deliberate strategic planning, while the other camp has maintained that strategy simply emerges over time as a firm takes various actions in response to environmental stimuli. Recently, researchers have recognized the more realistic view that deliberately planned strategies transform during implementation through an emergent strategy formation process. This chapter will review the literature on deliberate and emergent strategies, exploring the perspectives of the proponents and critics from each academic camp. It will then examine the two perspectives as ends of a continuum, citing a number of strategy types that exist between the end points. The concept of planned emergence, or a complementary deliberate and emergent approach, will next be discussed followed by an examination of the numerous empirical studies that have sought a link between formal strategic planning and organizational performance. Finally, a discussion of the emergent impact of chaotic systems and improvisation on deliberate strategy will be followed by perspectives on the future of strategy creation and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Andrews (1971), Ansoff (1991), Mintzberg (1977), Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  2. 2.

    Boyd (1991), Brews and Hunt (1999), Greenley (1994), Holloway (2004), Miller and Cardinal (1994), Schäffer and Willauer (2003).

  3. 3.

    Falshaw et al. (2006), Hopkins and Hopkins (1997), Thune and House (1970).

  4. 4.

    Parnell and Lester (2003).

  5. 5.

    Boyd and Reuning-Elliot (1998), Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  6. 6.

    Mintzberg (1977), p 29.

  7. 7.

    Grant (2003).

  8. 8.

    Mintzberg (1990), Grant (1995), Ginter et al. (1985), Boyd and Reuning-Elliot (1998).

  9. 9.

    Bain and Co. (2003).

  10. 10.

    Ansoff (1991), Mintzberg (1990).

  11. 11.

    Ansoff (1991).

  12. 12.

    Mintzberg (1977), p 29.

  13. 13.

    Mintzberg (1987).

  14. 14.

    Mintzberg (1987), p 74.

  15. 15.

    Wiltbank et al. (2006).

  16. 16.

    Bain and Co. (2003).

  17. 17.

    Ansoff (1991).

  18. 18.

    Mintzberg (1987), pp 66–75.

  19. 19.

    Bain and Co. (2003).

  20. 20.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  21. 21.

    Holloway (2004), p 472.

  22. 22.

    Grant (2003), pp 491–517, Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  23. 23.

    Holloway (2004), pp 469–483.

  24. 24.

    Entrekin and Court (2001).

  25. 25.

    Holloway (2004).

  26. 26.

    Holloway (2004).

  27. 27.

    Mintzberg (1977).

  28. 28.

    Ansoff (1991).

  29. 29.

    Ansoff (1991).

  30. 30.

    Ansoff (1991).

  31. 31.

    Mintzberg (1987), pp 66–75.

  32. 32.

    Mintzberg (1987), pp 28–40.

  33. 33.

    Mintzberg (1977), p 32.

  34. 34.

    Ansoff (1991), p 458.

  35. 35.

    Mintzberg (1977).

  36. 36.

    Mintzberg (1987), pp 66–75.

  37. 37.

    Mintzberg (1987), pp 66–75.

  38. 38.

    Mintzberg (1987), p 71.

  39. 39.

    Andersen (2004), Grant (2003), pp 491–517, Harrington et al. (2004), Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  40. 40.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  41. 41.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  42. 42.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  43. 43.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  44. 44.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  45. 45.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  46. 46.

    Mintzberg (1977, 1987), pp 66–75.

  47. 47.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985), p 271.

  48. 48.

    Bain and Co. (2003).

  49. 49.

    Andersen (2004), Grant (2003), pp 491–517, Harrington et al. (2004).

  50. 50.

    Mintzberg (1987), pp 66–75.

  51. 51.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  52. 52.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  53. 53.

    Grant (2003), pp 491–517.

  54. 54.

    Mintzberg (1977), p 36.

  55. 55.

    Mintzberg (1977), p 36.

  56. 56.

    Miller et al. (1984).

  57. 57.

    Mintzberg (1987), p 74.

  58. 58.

    Grove (1997).

  59. 59.

    Grove (1997).

  60. 60.

    Kjaergaard (2009).

  61. 61.

    Miller et al. (1984), Mintzberg (1987), pp 66–75.

  62. 62.

    Miller et al. (1984).

  63. 63.

    Mintzberg (1987), pp 66–75.

  64. 64.

    Greenley (1994).

  65. 65.

    Thune and House (1970).

  66. 66.

    Greenley (1994).

  67. 67.

    Greenley (1994).

  68. 68.

    Brews and Hunt (1999).

  69. 69.

    Miller and Cardinal (1994), p 1649.

  70. 70.

    Boyd (1991).

  71. 71.

    Greenley (1994).

  72. 72.

    Greenley (1994), Boyd (1991).

  73. 73.

    Hopkins and Hopkins (1997).

  74. 74.

    Falshaw et al. (2006).

  75. 75.

    Bradbury and Lichtenstein (2000), Lee et al. (1999).

  76. 76.

    Schäffer and Willauer (2003).

  77. 77.

    Greenley (1994), Miller and Cardinal (1994), Boyd and Reuning-Elliot (1998), pp 257–272.

  78. 78.

    Grant (2003), p 492.

  79. 79.

    Bain and Co. (2003).

  80. 80.

    Bradbury and Lichtenstein (2000).

  81. 81.

    Greenley (1994).

  82. 82.

    S&T Encyclopedia (2007).

  83. 83.

    Levy (1994).

  84. 84.

    Levy (1994), p 167.

  85. 85.

    Grant (2003), pp 491–517.

  86. 86.

    Ashill et al. (2003), Blythe and Zimmerman (2004), Depperu and Gnan (2006), Harrington et al. (2004), Miller et al. (1998).

  87. 87.

    Grant (2003), pp 491–517.

  88. 88.

    Boyd and Reuning-Elliot (1998), pp 257–272, Mintzberg and Lampel (1999).

  89. 89.

    Ashill et al. (2003).

  90. 90.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  91. 91.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985), p 257.

  92. 92.

    Sminia (2009).

  93. 93.

    Porter (1996).

  94. 94.

    Crossan (1998).

  95. 95.

    Crossan, and Sorrenti (1997).

  96. 96.

    Crossan (1998), Moorman and Miner (1998).

  97. 97.

    Mintzberg and Waters (1985).

  98. 98.

    Canadian Oxford Dictionary (2004).

  99. 99.

    Kanter (2002).

  100. 100.

    Kanter (2002).

  101. 101.

    Parnell and Lester (2003).

References

  • Andersen TJ (2004) Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments. J Manag Stud 41:1271–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews KR (1971) The concept of corporate strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff HI (1991) Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management’. Strateg Manag J 12(6):449–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashill NJ, Frederikson M, Davies J (2003) Strategic marketing planning: a grounded investigation. Eur J Market 37(3/4):430–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain and Co. (2003) Bain study reveals how firms are using three main analytical tools. Financial Times, 4th Sept 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Blythe J, Zimmerman A (2004) Strategic planning for global markets. Market Rev 4:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd BK (1991) Strategic planning and financial performance: a meta-analytic review. J Manag Stud 28(4):353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd BK, Reuning-Elliot E (1998) A measurement model of strategic planning. Strateg Manag J 19:181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury H, Lichtenstein BMB (2000) Relationality in organizational research: exploring the space between. Organ Sci 11(5):551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brews PJ, Hunt MR (1999) Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate. Strateg Manag J 20(10):889–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Oxford Dictionary (2004) In: Katherine Barber (ed.). 2nd edn. Oxford University Press: Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan MM (1998) Improvisation in action. Organ Sci 9:593–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan MM, Sorrenti M (1997) Making sense of improvisation. In: Walsh J, Huff J (eds) Advances in strategic management, vol 14. pp 155–180. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Depperu D, Gnan L (2006) The role of the competitive context in the business strategy-formation process. Int Stud Manag Organ 36:110–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entrekin L, Court M (2001) Human resource management practice: adaptation and change in an age of globalization. International Labour Office, Geneva, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Falshaw JR, Glaister KW, Tatoglu E (2006) Evidence on formal strategic planning and company performance. Manag Decis 44(1):9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginter PM, Rucks A, Duncan WJ (1985) Planners’ perceptions of the strategic management process. J Manag Stud 22(6):581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1995) Contemporary strategy analysis: concepts, techniques, applications, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (2003) Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors. Strateg Manag J 24:512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenley GE (1994) Strategic planning and company performance: an appraisal of the empirical evidence. Scand J Manag 10(4):383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove AS (1997) Navigating strategic inflection points. Bus Strategy Rev 8(3):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington RJ et al (2004) A question of fit: the links among environment, strategy formation, and performance. J Bus Manag 10:15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway DA (2004) Strategic planning and informed discourse: reality or rhetoric. Crit Perspect Account 15(4–5):469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WE, Hopkins SA (1997) Strategic planning-financial performance relationships in banks: a causal examination. Strateg Manag J 18(8):635–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (2002) Strategy as improvisational theater. MIT Sloan Management Review 76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergaard AL (2009) Organizational identity and strategy. Int Stud Manag Organ 39(1):50–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Sablynski CJ (1999) Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. J Vocat Behav 55:161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy D (1994) Chaos theory and strategy: theory, application, and managerial implications. Strateg Manag J 15:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller CC, Cardinal LB (1994) Strategic planning and firm performance: a synthesis of more than two decades of research. Acad Manag J 37(6):1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Friesen PH, Mintzberg H (1984) Organizations: a quantum view. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Droge C, Toulouse J-M (1998) Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Acad Manag J 31(3):544–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1977) Strategy formation as a historical process. Int Stud Manag Organ 7:28–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1987) Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review 65:73

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1990) The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strateg Manag J 11:171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Lampel J (1999) Reflecting on the strategy process. MIT Sloan Management Review 40:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg Manag J 6:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman C, Miner AS (1998) Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad Manag Rev 23:698–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell JA, Lester DL (2003) Towards a philosophy of strategy: reassessing five critical dilemmas in strategy formation and change. Strateg Change 12:291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Business Review:61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • S&T Encyclopedia (2007) McGraw-hill encyclopedia of science and technology online, 2007. http://connect.carleton.ca/cp/tag.f394e61f9e7ba7f8.render.userLayoutRootNode.uP?uP_root=root&uP_sparam=activeTab&activeTab=u11l1s154&uP_tparam=frm&frm=frame

  • Schäffer U, Willauer B (2003) Strategic planning as a learning process. Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR) 55:86–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Sminia H (2009) Process research in strategy formation: theory, methodology and relevance. Int J Manag Rev 11(1):97–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thune SS, House RJ (1970) Where long-range planning pays off. Bus Horiz 13(4):81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltbank R et al (2006) What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy. Strateg Manag J 27(10):981–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wade R. Rose Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, W.R., Murphy, S.A. (2015). Planned and Emergent Strategy. In: Thomas, A., Vaduva, S. (eds) Global Supply Chain Security. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2178-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics