Skip to main content
  • 1403 Accesses

Abstract

When contemplating neuromodulation as the next potential step, the treatment paradigm in the pain care algorithm, careful attention must be paid to the patient’s potential to respond to the therapy. There are a number of factors (both disease- and patient-specific) one must consider when selecting patients for this treatment modality to maximize the change of a successful outcome. Data suggest that particular disease states are more likely to respond to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) than others (e.g., radicular pain versus phantom limb).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  • Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study. Pain Med. 2012. doi:10.1111/pme.12294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:254–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de la Porte C, Siegfried J. Lumbosacral spinal fibrosis (spinal arachnoiditis). Its diagnosis and treatment by spinal cord stimulation. Spine. 1983;8:593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plazier M, van der Loo E, Menovsky T. Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:986–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deer TR, Raso LJ. Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris and peripheral vascular disease. Pain Physician. 2006;9:347–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deer T, Grigsby E, Weiner R, Wilcosky B, Kramer J. A prospective study of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the relief of chronic pain. Neuromodulation. 2013;16:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JM, Schade CM, Sasaki J, Caraway DL, Oakley JC. Prevention of mechanical failures in implanted spinal cord stimulation systems. Neuromodulation. 2006;9:183–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter C, DavĂ© N, Diwan S, Deer T. Neuromodulation of pelvic visceral pain: review of the literature and case series of potential novel targets for treatment. Pain Pract. 2013;13:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemler MA, de Vet HC, Barendse GA, van den Wildenberg FA, van Kleef M. Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic complex regional pain syndrome Type I: five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(2):292–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK, Laing P. Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain—some predictors of success. A 15-year experience. Surg Neurol. 1998;50:110–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Hunter G, Demeria D. Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:481–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liem L, Russo M, Huygen FJ, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Verrills P, et al. A multicenter, prospective trial to assess the safety and performance of the spinal modulation dorsal root ganglion neurostimulator system in the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation. 2013;16:471–82. doi:10.1111/ner.12072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meglio M, Cioni B, Rossi GF. Spinal cord stimulation in management of chronic pain: a 9-year experience. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:519–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • North RB, Wetzel FT. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of spinal origin: a valuable long-term solution. Spine. 2002;27:2584–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnmeiss D. Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for predominant complaints of chronic, intractable low back pain. Spine J. 2001;1:358–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg. 1967;46:489–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain. 2004;108:137–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy R. Deer MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hunter, C.W., Lee, E.T., Masone, R., Deer, T.R. (2016). Patient Selection. In: Deer, T., Pope, J. (eds) Atlas of Implantable Therapies for Pain Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2110-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2110-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2109-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2110-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics