Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leadership for Global Virtual Teams: Facilitating Teamwork Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leading Global Teams

Abstract

This chapter considers the intersection of leadership and global virtual team dynamics. We consider four key developments in the science of team effectiveness as they apply to virtual teams: (a) team emergent states, (b) team phases, (c) teamwork processes, and (d) team leadership functions. First, we elaborate the importance of team emergent states, highlighting their relevance to team success and acknowledging that leadership is a prominent force to help facilitate their development. Second, we describe the interaction processes through which teams develop optimal emergent states and achieve their goals over time. Leadership is needed that shapes team processes throughout the team lifecycle, and thereby team emergent states and performance. In closing, we offer specific, research-based strategies to guide today’s virtual team leaders in enabling optimal team processes, illustrating these suggestions using examples drawn from a large-scale study of in global virtual teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abad, A., Castella, V., Cuenca, I., & Navarro, P. (2002). Teamwork in different communication contexts: A longitudinal study. Psychology in Spain, 6, 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Gurau, C. (2011). Virtual team performance in a highly competitive environment. Group and Organization Management, 36, 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anawati, D., & Craig, A. (2006). Behavioral adaptation within cross-cultural virtual teams. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 49(1), 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asencio, R., Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Fiore, S. M. (2012). Charting a course for collaboration: A multiteam perspective. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2, 487–494.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balthazard, P., Waldman, D., Howell, J., & Atwater, L. (2004). Shared leadership and group interaction styles in problem-solving virtual teams. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 10043a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barge, J. K., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1989). Toward a communication competency model of group leadership. Small Group Research, 20, 167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Kozlowski, S. (2002). A typology for virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27, 13–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergiel, B., Bergiel, E., & Balsmeier, P. (2008). Nature of virtual teams: A summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. S., & Mendenhall, M. (1990). Cross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research. Academy of Management Review, 15, 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken, R. B., Ratzmann, M., & Winkler, V. A. (2008). Cross-cultural innovation teams: Effects of four types of attitudes towards expatriates. International Journal of Business Strategy, 8, 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. T., Carter, D., & DeChurch, L. (2012, August). IRT-based evidence of team construct measurement quality and emergence. In: N. Carter & D. R. Carter (Co-Chairs), Aligning team measurement practice with theory through novel analytic applications. Symposium at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N., Monge, P., & Leonardi, P. (2011). Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: Bringing the technology inside the network. International Journal of Communication, 5, 682–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, M., Weingart, L., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dackert, I., Loov, L.-A., & Martensson, M. (2004). Leadership and the climate for innovation in teams. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 25, 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., & Bryant, J. L. (2003). Influence at a distance: Leadership in global virtual teams. Advances in Global Leadership, 3, 303–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeChurch, L., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, K., & Panteli, N. (2010). From virtual teams to virtuality in teams. Human Relations, 63, 1177–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., & Peterson, R. S. (2004). The elusive cultural chameleon: Cultural intelligence as a new approach to intercultural training for the global manager. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 505–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, J. (1991). The development of time orientation measures for use in cross-cultural research. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (2012). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 43, 702–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). Meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (2012). From causes to conditions in group research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 428–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (1959). The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. R., & Moran, R. T. (1991). Managing cultural differences (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1/2), 46–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1080–1089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., & Lazarova, M. (2005). Do “global” teams need “global” leaders? Identifying leadership competencies in multinational teams. Advances in International Management, 18, 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R. B., Hogan, R., & Craig, S. B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist, 63, 96–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J.-L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Gibson, C. B., & Kim, K. (2012). Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual team research. Oxford Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 789–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B., & Mathieu, J. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Ziegert, J. C., Knight, A. P., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 590–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development, 240-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2001). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H., & Templer, K. J. (2003). CQ assessment and measurement. In P. C. Earley & S. Ang (Eds.), Cultural intelligence: An analysis of individual interactions across cultures (pp. 185–208). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, R., Engelen, J., & Krazter, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidiemsional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G. (1977). Functional leadership behavior: Measurement and relation to social power and leadership perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M., Mathieu, J., & Zaccaro, S. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L., Gilson, L., & Maynard, M. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L. L., Miliken, F., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Salgado, S. R. (2003). Racioethnic diversity and group members’ experiences. Group and Organization Management, 28, 75–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., Maynard, M., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., & Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Shoorman, F. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M., Hartman, N., Whetzel, D., & Grubb, W. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1962). Leadership behavior: Some requirements for leadership training [Mimeographed]. Washington, DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 38, 876–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 212–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muethel, M., & Hoegl, M. (2010). Cultural and societal influences on shared leadership in globally dispersed teams. Journal of International Management, 16, 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, W. I., Jr., & Sussman, L. (2009). Team charters-theoretical foundations and practical implications for quality and performance. Quality Management Journal, 16, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G., & Olson, J. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinelle, D., Dyck, J., & Gutwin, C. (2003). Aligning work practices and mobile technologies: Groupware design for loosely coupled mobile groups (pp. 177–192). Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Conference, Udine, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37, 926–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, J. R., Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 391–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. J., Sieck, W. R., & Smart, P. (2009). What is a good plan? Cultural variations in expert planners’ concepts of plan quality. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 3, 228–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Vazquez, J., Ortiz-Fournier, L., & Flores, F. (2009). Overcoming cultural barriers for innovation and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, L., & Duxbury, L. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20, 267–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 45, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siakas, K. V., & Georgiadou, E. (2006). Knowledge sharing: cultural dynamics (pp. 505–513). Proceedings of 7th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM06), Public Academic Conferences, Reading, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, E. E., & Rentsch, J. R. (2010). Shared leadership in teams: A matter of distribution. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(4), 203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Makela, K., Zander, L., & Maznevski, M. (2010). A look at the bright side of multicultural team diversity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(439), 447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, S. M., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. Journal of Management, 38, 969–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. (2007). Work group diversity. The Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassenaar, C., Pearce, G. L., Hoch, J. E., & Wegge, J. (2009). Shared leadership meets virtual teams: A match made in cyberspace. In P. Yoong (Ed.), Leadership in the digital enterprise: Issues and challenges. Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W., Kumar, K., & Michaelson, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 996–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woody, M. (2013). How to use video conferencing the right way. Retrieved from http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2013/07/15/power-face-time-and-modern-video-conferencing/

  • Zaccaro, S. J., & DeChurch, L. A. (2012). Leadership forms and functions in multiteam systems. In S. J. Zaccaro, M. A. Marks, & L. A. DeChurch (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, L., Mockaitis, A. I., & Butler, C. L. (2012). Leading global teams. Journal of World Business, 47, 592–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolin, R., Hinds, P. J., Fruchter, R., & Levitt, R. E. (2004). Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study. Information and Organization, 14, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to acknowledge the following funding sources that contributed to the development of the ideas presented in this chapter: National Science Foundation Grants: SES-1219469 & SBE-1063901.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0170, USA

    Dorothy R. Carter, Peter W. Seely & Leslie A. DeChurch Ph.D.

  2. Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0170, USA

    Joe Dagosta

  3. Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030-4422, USA

    Stephen J. Zaccaro Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Dorothy R. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter W. Seely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joe Dagosta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leslie A. DeChurch Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephen J. Zaccaro Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothy R. Carter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology and Institute for Cross Cultural Management, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA

    Jessica L. Wildman

  2. School of Psychology and Institute for Cross Cultural Management, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA

    Richard L. Griffith

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carter, D.R., Seely, P.W., Dagosta, J., DeChurch, L.A., Zaccaro, S.J. (2015). Leadership for Global Virtual Teams: Facilitating Teamwork Processes. In: Wildman, J., Griffith, R. (eds) Leading Global Teams. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2050-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation