Prevention, Identification, and Treatment of Perforation in the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract

Abstract

Perforation is one of the most undesirable procedural complications associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and can be largely classified into those that occur during procedures, and those that have a delayed, postprocedural onset. Although intraprocedural perforations can be clipped and repaired, in cases where the gastrointestinal content has leaked into the abdominal cavity before any preemptive repair could be attempted, the potential for developing peritonitis becomes a grim and sobering possibility. Surgical repair (e.g. salvage laparotomy) is indicated in cases of postprocedural perforation. Conducting ESD via direct observation remains the paramount option for preventing this serious complication; however, even this does not guarantee a complication-free procedure and accidents can occur under the watch of some of the most experienced operators. Therefore, in order to effectively mitigate the inherent risk for perforation, a comprehensive pretreatment regimen and insufflation using carbon dioxide are absolutely imperative.

Keywords

Perforation Colorectal ESD Identification Treatment Prevention 

References

  1. 1.
    Toyonaga T, Nishino E, Man-i M, East JE, Azuma T. Principles of quality controlled endoscopic submucosal dissection with appropriate dissection level and high quality resected specimen. Clin Endosc. 2012;45:362–74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toyonaga T, Azuma T. How to prevent complications at ESD of colorectal lesions. Video J Encycl GI Endosc. 2013;1(2):365–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toyonaga T, Man-i M, East JE, et al. 1,635 Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):1000–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Fujita T, East JE, Nishino E, Ono W, Morita Y, Sanuki T, Yoshida M, Kutsumi H, Inokuchi H, Azuma T. Retrospective study for technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Endoscopy. 2010;42:714–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Fujita T, East JE, Coumaros D, Morita Y, Yoshida M, Hayakumo T, Inokuchi H, Azuma T. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using the Flush knife and the Flush knife BT. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;13:84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Obata D, Ishida T, Morita Y, Azuma T. Endoscopic double-layered suturing: a novel technique for closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Endoscopy. 2012;44:E153–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Morita Y, Sanuki T, Yoshida M, Kutsumi H, Inokuchi H, Azuma T. The new resources of treatment for early stage colorectal tumors: EMR with small incision and simplified endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2009;21:S31–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kobe University HospitalKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations