Skip to main content

Perceived Exertion Scale Validation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perceived Exertion Laboratory Manual

Abstract

Both concurrent and construct validity are important psychometric properties for perceived exertion scales applied in the clinical and performance settings. A graded exercise test that employs a perceptual estimation protocol is the standard for determination of perceived exertion scale validity for both aerobic and resistance exercise. Both undifferentiated and differentiated RPE can be measured using a scale validity experiment, but special attention should be paid to determination of the dominant RPE signal during exercise. Concurrent and construct validity evidence has been shown for both undifferentiated and differentiated RPE in various sample populations performing aerobic and resistance exercise. A perceived exertion scale that demonstrates concurrent and construct validity can be applied to both exercise testing and prescription in hospital and field settings. Such applications can include the prediction of impending exercise test termination and exercise intensity self-regulation. The primary purpose of this laboratory experiment is to establish concurrent and construct validity for an OMNI RPE Scale. Secondary purposes include the comparison of concurrent validity evidence between the OMNI RPE Scale and the Borg Scale and to determine differentiated RPE signal dominance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreacci JL, Haile L, Dixon C. Influence of testing sequence on a child’s ability to achieve maximal anaerobic and aerobic power. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(8):673–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baechle TR, Earle RW. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasekaran G, Loh MK, Govindaswamy VV, Robertson RJ. OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation for Singapore children during cycle exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3533–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day JR, Rossiter HB, Coats EM, Skasick A, Whipp BJ. The maximally attainable VO2 during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:1901–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eston RG, Lamb KL, Bain A, Williams AM, Williams JG. Validity of a perceived exertion scale for children: a pilot study. Percept Mot Skills. 1994;78:691–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster C, Kuffel E, Bradley N, Battista RA, Wright G, Porcari JP, Lucia A, deKoning JJ. VO2max during successive maximal efforts. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;102:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Haile L, Krause MP, Nagle EF, Metz KF, Kim K. Identification of a rating of perceived exertion-based warning zone to anticipate graded treadmill test termination. Percept Mot Skills. 2010a;110:213–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Haile L, Nagle EF, Metz KF, Kim K. Use of ratings of perceived exertion to anticipate treadmill test termination in patients taking beta-blockers. Percept Mot Skills. 2010b;111:310–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause MP, Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Kim K, Elsangedy HM, Krinski K, da Silva S. Concurrent validity of an OMNI rating of perceived exertion scale for bench stepping exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:506–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lagally KM, Robertson RJ. Construct validity of the OMNI resistance exercise scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20:252–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb KL. Children’s ratings of effort during cycle ergometry: an examination of the validity of two effort rating scales. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1995;7:407–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung M, Chung P, Leung RW. An assessment of the validity and reliability of two perceived exertion rating scales among Hong Kong children. Percept Mot Skills. 2002;95:1047–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mays RJ, Goss FL, Schafer MA, Kim KH, Nagle-Stilley EF, Robertson RJ. Validation of adult OMNI perceived exertion scales for elliptical ergometry. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111:848–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Online (2014) Dictionary and thesauraus. http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2014.

  • Morgan W, Borg GA. Perception of effort in the prescription of physical activity. In: Nelson T, editor. Mental health and emotional aspects of sports. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1976. p. 126–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer KA, Pivarnik JM, Womack CJ, Reeves MJ, Malina RM. Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:2057–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powers SK, Howley ET. Exercise physiology: theory and application to fitness and performance. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion for practitioners: rating effort with the OMNI picture system. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Boer NF, People JA, Foreman AJ, Dabayebeh IM, Millich NB, Balasekaran G, Riechman SE, Gallagher JD, Thompkins T. Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:452–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Boer N, Gallagher JD, Thompkins T, Bufalino K, Balasekaran G, Meckes C, Pintar J, Williams A. OMNI scale perceived exertion at ventilatory breakpoint in children: response normalized. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1946–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, Lenz B, Dixon C, Timmer J, Frazee K, Dube J, Andreacci J. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:333–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Dube J, Rutkowski J, Dupain M, Brennan C, Andreacci J. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Andreacci JL, Dube JJ, Rutkowski JJ, Frazee KM, Aaron DJ, Metz KF, Kowallis RA, Snee BM. Validation of the children’s OMNI-resistance exercise scale of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005a;37:819–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Andreacci JL, Dube JJ, Rutkowski JJ, Snee BM, Kowallis RA, Crawford K, Aaron DJ, Metz KF. Validation of the children’s OMNI RPE scale for stepping exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005b;37:290–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter HB, Kowalchuk JM, Whipp BJ. A test to establish maximum O2 uptake despite no plateau in the O2 uptake response to ramp incremental exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:764–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siconilfi SF, Culliname EM, Carleton RA, Thompson PD. Assessing VO2max in epidemiologic studies: modifications of the Astrand-Rhyming test. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:335–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suminski RR, Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Olvera N. Validation of the OMNI scale of perceived exertion in a sample of Spanish-speaking youth from the USA. Percept Mot Skills. 2008;107:181–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Nieman DC, Kang J. Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: walking/running evaluation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Green JM, Suminski RR, Mcanulty SR, Nieman DC. Validation of the adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1776–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JG, Eston RG, Furlong B. CERT: a perceived exertion scale for young children. Percept Mot Skills. 1994;79:1451–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haile, L., Gallagher, M., J. Robertson, R. (2015). Perceived Exertion Scale Validation. In: Perceived Exertion Laboratory Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1917-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics