Advertisement

Perceived Exertion Scale Validation

  • Luke Haile
  • Michael GallagherJr.
  • Robert J. Robertson
Chapter

Abstract

Both concurrent and construct validity are important psychometric properties for perceived exertion scales applied in the clinical and performance settings. A graded exercise test that employs a perceptual estimation protocol is the standard for determination of perceived exertion scale validity for both aerobic and resistance exercise. Both undifferentiated and differentiated RPE can be measured using a scale validity experiment, but special attention should be paid to determination of the dominant RPE signal during exercise. Concurrent and construct validity evidence has been shown for both undifferentiated and differentiated RPE in various sample populations performing aerobic and resistance exercise. A perceived exertion scale that demonstrates concurrent and construct validity can be applied to both exercise testing and prescription in hospital and field settings. Such applications can include the prediction of impending exercise test termination and exercise intensity self-regulation. The primary purpose of this laboratory experiment is to establish concurrent and construct validity for an OMNI RPE Scale. Secondary purposes include the comparison of concurrent validity evidence between the OMNI RPE Scale and the Borg Scale and to determine differentiated RPE signal dominance.

Keywords

Validity Concurrent Construct Pearson correlation Estimation protocol Differentiated RPE Undifferentiated RPE Maximal exercise testing RPE warning zone Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) 

References

  1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Andreacci JL, Haile L, Dixon C. Influence of testing sequence on a child’s ability to achieve maximal anaerobic and aerobic power. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(8):673–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baechle TR, Earle RW. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Balasekaran G, Loh MK, Govindaswamy VV, Robertson RJ. OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation for Singapore children during cycle exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3533–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Day JR, Rossiter HB, Coats EM, Skasick A, Whipp BJ. The maximally attainable VO2 during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:1901–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eston RG, Lamb KL, Bain A, Williams AM, Williams JG. Validity of a perceived exertion scale for children: a pilot study. Percept Mot Skills. 1994;78:691–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foster C, Kuffel E, Bradley N, Battista RA, Wright G, Porcari JP, Lucia A, deKoning JJ. VO2max during successive maximal efforts. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;102:67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Haile L, Krause MP, Nagle EF, Metz KF, Kim K. Identification of a rating of perceived exertion-based warning zone to anticipate graded treadmill test termination. Percept Mot Skills. 2010a;110:213–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Haile L, Nagle EF, Metz KF, Kim K. Use of ratings of perceived exertion to anticipate treadmill test termination in patients taking beta-blockers. Percept Mot Skills. 2010b;111:310–8.Google Scholar
  10. Krause MP, Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Kim K, Elsangedy HM, Krinski K, da Silva S. Concurrent validity of an OMNI rating of perceived exertion scale for bench stepping exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:506–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lagally KM, Robertson RJ. Construct validity of the OMNI resistance exercise scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20:252–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lamb KL. Children’s ratings of effort during cycle ergometry: an examination of the validity of two effort rating scales. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1995;7:407–21.Google Scholar
  13. Leung M, Chung P, Leung RW. An assessment of the validity and reliability of two perceived exertion rating scales among Hong Kong children. Percept Mot Skills. 2002;95:1047–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mays RJ, Goss FL, Schafer MA, Kim KH, Nagle-Stilley EF, Robertson RJ. Validation of adult OMNI perceived exertion scales for elliptical ergometry. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111:848–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Merriam-Webster Online (2014) Dictionary and thesauraus. http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2014.
  16. Morgan W, Borg GA. Perception of effort in the prescription of physical activity. In: Nelson T, editor. Mental health and emotional aspects of sports. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1976. p. 126–9.Google Scholar
  17. Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996.Google Scholar
  18. Pfeiffer KA, Pivarnik JM, Womack CJ, Reeves MJ, Malina RM. Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:2057–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Powers SK, Howley ET. Exercise physiology: theory and application to fitness and performance. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2012.Google Scholar
  20. Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion for practitioners: rating effort with the OMNI picture system. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.Google Scholar
  21. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Boer NF, People JA, Foreman AJ, Dabayebeh IM, Millich NB, Balasekaran G, Riechman SE, Gallagher JD, Thompkins T. Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:452–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Boer N, Gallagher JD, Thompkins T, Bufalino K, Balasekaran G, Meckes C, Pintar J, Williams A. OMNI scale perceived exertion at ventilatory breakpoint in children: response normalized. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1946–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, Lenz B, Dixon C, Timmer J, Frazee K, Dube J, Andreacci J. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:333–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Dube J, Rutkowski J, Dupain M, Brennan C, Andreacci J. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:102–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Andreacci JL, Dube JJ, Rutkowski JJ, Frazee KM, Aaron DJ, Metz KF, Kowallis RA, Snee BM. Validation of the children’s OMNI-resistance exercise scale of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005a;37:819–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Andreacci JL, Dube JJ, Rutkowski JJ, Snee BM, Kowallis RA, Crawford K, Aaron DJ, Metz KF. Validation of the children’s OMNI RPE scale for stepping exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005b;37:290–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossiter HB, Kowalchuk JM, Whipp BJ. A test to establish maximum O2 uptake despite no plateau in the O2 uptake response to ramp incremental exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:764–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siconilfi SF, Culliname EM, Carleton RA, Thompson PD. Assessing VO2max in epidemiologic studies: modifications of the Astrand-Rhyming test. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:335–8.Google Scholar
  29. Suminski RR, Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Olvera N. Validation of the OMNI scale of perceived exertion in a sample of Spanish-speaking youth from the USA. Percept Mot Skills. 2008;107:181–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Nieman DC, Kang J. Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: walking/running evaluation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:139–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Green JM, Suminski RR, Mcanulty SR, Nieman DC. Validation of the adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1776–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams JG, Eston RG, Furlong B. CERT: a perceived exertion scale for young children. Percept Mot Skills. 1994;79:1451–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luke Haile
    • 1
  • Michael GallagherJr.
    • 2
  • Robert J. Robertson
    • 3
  1. 1.Lock Haven University of PennsylvaniaLock HavenUSA
  2. 2.University of Central ArkansasConwayUSA
  3. 3.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations