Abstract
Crime control theater (CCT) refers to popular laws which appear to offer simple solutions to address serious crimes but are not empirically effective. Sex offender registration and notification laws meet each of the CCT criteria: reactionary response to a moral panic, unquestioned acceptance and promotion, appeal to mythic narratives, and empirical failure. These laws have resulted in unintended consequences including violence directed at offenders’ families, inability for offenders to reintegrate into society, misuse of the laws on unintended populations, and others. A theoretical explanation for why community sentiment toward CCT laws remains positive utilizes social cognitive mechanisms of schemas and heuristics in combination with cognitive-experiential self-theory. These theories suggest that people utilize cognitive shortcuts and emotive processing in forming their reactions to crime. Understanding how these theories work can help prevent adoption of CCT laws and promote more effective laws.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adkins, G., Huff, D., Stageberg, P., Prell, L., & Musel, S. (2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning and Statistical Analysis Center. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/app/abstractdb/AbstractDBDetails.aspx?id=202847
Barnoski, R. (2005). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Has community notification reduced recidivism? Olympia, WA: Washington Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/05-12-1202.pdf
Conmartin, E. B., Kernsmith, P. D., & Miles, B. W. (2010). Family experiences of young adult sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 204–225. doi:10.1080/10538711003627207.
Currie, E. (1998). Crime and punishment in America: Why the solutions to America’s most stubborn social crisis have not worked—and what will. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
DeGroof, S. (2009). And my mama said…: The (relative) parental influence on fear of crime among adolescent girls and boys. Youth and Society, 39, 267–293. doi:10.1177/0044118X07301000.
Duwe, G., Donnay, W., & Tewksbury, R. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 484–504.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.202.
Edwards, W., & Hensley, C. (2001). Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: Evaluating the impact of latent consequences in community notification laws. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 83–101. doi:10.1177/0306624X01451006.
Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Forbes, S. G. (2011). Sex, cells, and SORNA: Applying sex offender registration laws to sexting cases. William & Mary Law Review, 52, 1718–1743. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol52/iss5/7
Fox, K. A., Lane, J., & Akers, R. L. (2010). Do perceptions of neighborhood disorganization predict crime or victimization? An examination of gang member versus non-gang member jail inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 720–729. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.046.
Griffin, T., & Miller, M. K. (2008). Child abduction, AMBER alert, and crime control theater. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 159–176. doi:10.1177/0734016808316778.
Hammond, M., Miller, M. K., & Griffin, T. (2010). Safe Haven Laws as Crime Control Theater. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(7), 545–552. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.11.006
Hanson, R., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. The Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163.
Harris, P. W., Mennis, J., Obradovic, Z., Izenman, A. J., & Grunwald, H. E. (2011). The coaction of neighborhood and individual effects on juvenile recidivism. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 13, 33–55. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.org/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol13num3/ch2.html
Howard, J. A., & Renfrow, D. G. (2003). Social cognition. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Jackson, J. (2009). Public health and fear of crime: A prospective cohort study. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 832–847. doi:10.1093/bjc/azp033.
Johnson, B. T., Maio, G. R., & Smith-McLallen, A. (2005). Communication and attitude change: Causes, processes, and effects. In D. AlbarracĂn, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 617–670). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Kernsmith, P. D., Comartin, E., Craun, S. W., & Kernsmith, R. M. (2009). The relationship between sex offender registry utilization and awareness. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 181–193. doi:10.1177/1079063209332235.
Letourneau, E. J., & Miner, M. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legal and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 293–312. doi:10.1007/s11194-005-5059-y.
Letourneau, E. J. & Armstrong, K. S. (2008). Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 393–408.
Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 137–161. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x.
Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. S. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49–66. doi:10.1177/1043986204271676.
Levenson, J. S., & D’Amora, D. A. (2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor’s new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(2), 168–199. doi:10.1177/0887403406295309.
Levenson, J. S., D’Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Megan’s law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 587–602. doi:10.1002/bsl.770.
Levenson, J., & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 54–68. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-008-9055-x
May, D. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Virgo, K. (2002). The impact of parental attachment and supervision on fear of crime among adolescent males. Adolescence, 37, 267–287.
McLaughlin, E. C., & Baldacci, M. (2014). Neo-Nazis feign remorse, taunt family of murdered sex offender. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/07/justice/south-carolina-neo-nazis-murder-sex-offender/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Meloy, M. L., Miller, S. L., & Curtis, K. M. (2008). Making sense out of nonsense: The deconstruction of state-level sex offender residence restrictions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 209–222. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-008-9042-2
Minnesota Department of Corrections (2003). Level three sex offenders: Residential placement issues. Retrieved from http://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2003/mandated/030175.pdf
Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 329–350. doi:10.1080/01639620600605606.
Operario, D., & Fiske, S. (1999). Social cognition permeates social psychology: Motivated mental processes guide the study of human social behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 63–78. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00026.
Palermo, G. B., & Farkas, M. A. (2001). The dilemma of the sexual offender. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishing, Ltd.
Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., Westerman, C. Y. K., Orfgen, T., & Foregger, S. (2007). The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: A test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. Human Communication Research, 33, 81–102. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00290.x.
Phillips, D. M. (1998). Community notification as viewed by Washington’s citizens. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Proctor, J. L., Badzinski, D. M., & Johnson, M. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan’s Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13(4), 356–379. doi:10.1177/088740302237804.
Randolph, W., & Viswanath, K. (2004). Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: Marketing health in a crowded media world. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 419–437. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123046.
Salerno, J. M., Stevenson, M., Najdowski, C. J., Wiley, T. R., Bottoms, B. L., & Peter-Hagene, L. (2014). Applying sex offender registry laws to juvenile offenders. In M. K. Miller, C. Chamberlain, & T. Wingrove (Eds.), Psychology, law, and the wellbeing of children (pp. 66–82). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sandler, J. C., Freeman, N. J., & Socia, K. M. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 284–302. doi:10.1037/a0013881.
Schram, D. D., & Milloy, C. D. (1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Selvog, H. H. (2001). Social state to penal state: Moral panic and sex offenders. Justice Policy Journal: Analyzing Criminal and Juvenile Justice Issues and Policies. 1(1), 74–96. Retrieved from http://www.cjcj.org/files/jpjv1n1.pdf
Sicafuse, L. L., & Miller, M. K. (2010). Social psychological influences on the popularity of AMBER alerts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1237–1254. doi:10.1177/0093854810379618.
Sicafuse, L. L., & Miller, M. K. (2012). The effects of information processing and message quality on attitudes toward the AMBER Alert System. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 8(2), 69–86. Retrieved from http://www.apcj.org/journal/index.php?mode=view&item=76
Surette, R. (2007). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images, realities and policies (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Tewksbury, R., Jennings, W. G., & Zgoba, K. M. (2012). A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 308–328. doi:10.1002/bsl.1009.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26(3), 309–334. doi:10.1080/02732170500524246.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. (2008). Where registered sex offenders live: Community characteristics and proximity to possible victims. Victims and Offenders, 3(1), 86–98. doi:10.1080/15564880701752371.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Vasquez, B. E., Maddan, S., & Walker, J. T. (2008). The influence of sex offender registration and notification laws in the United States: A time-series analysis. Crime and Delinquency, 54(2), 175–192. doi:10.1177/0011128707311641.
Wilcox, B. L., Weisz, P. V., & Miller, M. K. (2005). Practical guidelines for educating policymakers: The Family Impact Seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 638–645.
Yung, C. (2009). One of these laws is not like the others: Why the Federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act raises new constitutional questions. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 46, 369–425. Retrieved from http://www.harvardjol.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/369-424.pdf
Zevitz, R. G. (2004). Sex offender placement and neighborhood social integration: The making of a scarlet letter community. Criminal Justice Studies, 17(2), 203–222. doi:10.1080/0888431042000235039.
Zgoba, K. M. (2004). Spin doctors and moral crusaders: The moral panic behind child safety legislation. Criminal Justice Studies, 17(4), 385–404. doi:10.1080/1478601042000314892.
Zgoba, K., Sager, W., & Witt, P. (2003). Evaluation of New Jersey’s sexual offender treatment program at the Adult Diagnostic Treatment and Treatment Center: Preliminary result. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 31, 133–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armstrong, M.M., Miller, M.K., Griffin, T. (2015). An Examination of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws: Can Community Sentiment Lead to Ineffective Laws?. In: Miller, M., Blumenthal, J., Chamberlain, J. (eds) Handbook of Community Sentiment. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1898-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1899-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)