Skip to main content

An Examination of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws: Can Community Sentiment Lead to Ineffective Laws?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Community Sentiment

Abstract

Crime control theater (CCT) refers to popular laws which appear to offer simple solutions to address serious crimes but are not empirically effective. Sex offender registration and notification laws meet each of the CCT criteria: reactionary response to a moral panic, unquestioned acceptance and promotion, appeal to mythic narratives, and empirical failure. These laws have resulted in unintended consequences including violence directed at offenders’ families, inability for offenders to reintegrate into society, misuse of the laws on unintended populations, and others. A theoretical explanation for why community sentiment toward CCT laws remains positive utilizes social cognitive mechanisms of schemas and heuristics in combination with cognitive-experiential self-theory. These theories suggest that people utilize cognitive shortcuts and emotive processing in forming their reactions to crime. Understanding how these theories work can help prevent adoption of CCT laws and promote more effective laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, G., Huff, D., Stageberg, P., Prell, L., & Musel, S. (2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning and Statistical Analysis Center. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/app/abstractdb/AbstractDBDetails.aspx?id=202847

  • Barnoski, R. (2005). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Has community notification reduced recidivism? Olympia, WA: Washington Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/05-12-1202.pdf

  • Conmartin, E. B., Kernsmith, P. D., & Miles, B. W. (2010). Family experiences of young adult sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 204–225. doi:10.1080/10538711003627207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (1998). Crime and punishment in America: Why the solutions to America’s most stubborn social crisis have not worked—and what will. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroof, S. (2009). And my mama said…: The (relative) parental influence on fear of crime among adolescent girls and boys. Youth and Society, 39, 267–293. doi:10.1177/0044118X07301000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duwe, G., Donnay, W., & Tewksbury, R. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 484–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., & Hensley, C. (2001). Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: Evaluating the impact of latent consequences in community notification laws. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 83–101. doi:10.1177/0306624X01451006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, S. G. (2011). Sex, cells, and SORNA: Applying sex offender registration laws to sexting cases. William & Mary Law Review, 52, 1718–1743. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol52/iss5/7

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. A., Lane, J., & Akers, R. L. (2010). Do perceptions of neighborhood disorganization predict crime or victimization? An examination of gang member versus non-gang member jail inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 720–729. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, T., & Miller, M. K. (2008). Child abduction, AMBER alert, and crime control theater. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 159–176. doi:10.1177/0734016808316778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M., Miller, M. K., & Griffin, T. (2010). Safe Haven Laws as Crime Control Theater. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(7), 545–552. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.11.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. The Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. W., Mennis, J., Obradovic, Z., Izenman, A. J., & Grunwald, H. E. (2011). The coaction of neighborhood and individual effects on juvenile recidivism. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 13, 33–55. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.org/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol13num3/ch2.html

  • Howard, J. A., & Renfrow, D. G. (2003). Social cognition. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2009). Public health and fear of crime: A prospective cohort study. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 832–847. doi:10.1093/bjc/azp033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. T., Maio, G. R., & Smith-McLallen, A. (2005). Communication and attitude change: Causes, processes, and effects. In D. AlbarracĂ­n, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 617–670). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernsmith, P. D., Comartin, E., Craun, S. W., & Kernsmith, R. M. (2009). The relationship between sex offender registry utilization and awareness. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 181–193. doi:10.1177/1079063209332235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau, E. J., & Miner, M. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legal and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 293–312. doi:10.1007/s11194-005-5059-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau, E. J. & Armstrong, K. S. (2008). Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 137–161. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. S. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49–66. doi:10.1177/1043986204271676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., & D’Amora, D. A. (2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor’s new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(2), 168–199. doi:10.1177/0887403406295309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., D’Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Megan’s law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 587–602. doi:10.1002/bsl.770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J., & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 54–68. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-008-9055-x

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Virgo, K. (2002). The impact of parental attachment and supervision on fear of crime among adolescent males. Adolescence, 37, 267–287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E. C., & Baldacci, M. (2014). Neo-Nazis feign remorse, taunt family of murdered sex offender. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/07/justice/south-carolina-neo-nazis-murder-sex-offender/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

  • Meloy, M. L., Miller, S. L., & Curtis, K. M. (2008). Making sense out of nonsense: The deconstruction of state-level sex offender residence restrictions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 209–222. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-008-9042-2

  • Minnesota Department of Corrections (2003). Level three sex offenders: Residential placement issues. Retrieved from http://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2003/mandated/030175.pdf

  • Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 329–350. doi:10.1080/01639620600605606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Operario, D., & Fiske, S. (1999). Social cognition permeates social psychology: Motivated mental processes guide the study of human social behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 63–78. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, G. B., & Farkas, M. A. (2001). The dilemma of the sexual offender. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., Westerman, C. Y. K., Orfgen, T., & Foregger, S. (2007). The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: A test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. Human Communication Research, 33, 81–102. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00290.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. M. (1998). Community notification as viewed by Washington’s citizens. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, J. L., Badzinski, D. M., & Johnson, M. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan’s Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13(4), 356–379. doi:10.1177/088740302237804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, W., & Viswanath, K. (2004). Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: Marketing health in a crowded media world. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 419–437. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, J. M., Stevenson, M., Najdowski, C. J., Wiley, T. R., Bottoms, B. L., & Peter-Hagene, L. (2014). Applying sex offender registry laws to juvenile offenders. In M. K. Miller, C. Chamberlain, & T. Wingrove (Eds.), Psychology, law, and the wellbeing of children (pp. 66–82). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, J. C., Freeman, N. J., & Socia, K. M. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 284–302. doi:10.1037/a0013881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schram, D. D., & Milloy, C. D. (1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvog, H. H. (2001). Social state to penal state: Moral panic and sex offenders. Justice Policy Journal: Analyzing Criminal and Juvenile Justice Issues and Policies. 1(1), 74–96. Retrieved from http://www.cjcj.org/files/jpjv1n1.pdf

  • Sicafuse, L. L., & Miller, M. K. (2010). Social psychological influences on the popularity of AMBER alerts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1237–1254. doi:10.1177/0093854810379618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicafuse, L. L., & Miller, M. K. (2012). The effects of information processing and message quality on attitudes toward the AMBER Alert System. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 8(2), 69–86. Retrieved from http://www.apcj.org/journal/index.php?mode=view&item=76

  • Surette, R. (2007). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images, realities and policies (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, R., Jennings, W. G., & Zgoba, K. M. (2012). A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 308–328. doi:10.1002/bsl.1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26(3), 309–334. doi:10.1080/02732170500524246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. (2008). Where registered sex offenders live: Community characteristics and proximity to possible victims. Victims and Offenders, 3(1), 86–98. doi:10.1080/15564880701752371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, B. E., Maddan, S., & Walker, J. T. (2008). The influence of sex offender registration and notification laws in the United States: A time-series analysis. Crime and Delinquency, 54(2), 175–192. doi:10.1177/0011128707311641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B. L., Weisz, P. V., & Miller, M. K. (2005). Practical guidelines for educating policymakers: The Family Impact Seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 638–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yung, C. (2009). One of these laws is not like the others: Why the Federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act raises new constitutional questions. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 46, 369–425. Retrieved from http://www.harvardjol.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/369-424.pdf

  • Zevitz, R. G. (2004). Sex offender placement and neighborhood social integration: The making of a scarlet letter community. Criminal Justice Studies, 17(2), 203–222. doi:10.1080/0888431042000235039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zgoba, K. M. (2004). Spin doctors and moral crusaders: The moral panic behind child safety legislation. Criminal Justice Studies, 17(4), 385–404. doi:10.1080/1478601042000314892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zgoba, K., Sager, W., & Witt, P. (2003). Evaluation of New Jersey’s sexual offender treatment program at the Adult Diagnostic Treatment and Treatment Center: Preliminary result. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 31, 133–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica K. Miller J.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armstrong, M.M., Miller, M.K., Griffin, T. (2015). An Examination of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws: Can Community Sentiment Lead to Ineffective Laws?. In: Miller, M., Blumenthal, J., Chamberlain, J. (eds) Handbook of Community Sentiment. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics