Skip to main content

Abstract

The vagina is often difficult to evaluate on cross-sectional imaging. Therefore, proficiency in imaging techniques and MR imaging protocols to enhance visualization is critical. An understanding of vaginal anatomy and embryology allows identification of varying congenital anomalies. Vaginal lesions may initially be divided into solid and cystic lesions. Further characterization by imaging features will help differentiate benign from malignant lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Walker D, Salibian R, et al. Overlooked diseases of the vagina: a directed anatomic-pathologic approach to imaging assessment. RadioGraphics. 2011;31:1583–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegelman E, Outwater E, et al. High-resolution MR imaging of the vagina. Radiographics. 1997;17:1183–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler P, Mitchell A, Ellis H. Applied radiological anatomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hricak H, Chang Y, Thurnher S. Vagina: evaluation with MR imaging. Part I. Normal anatomy and congenital anomalies. Radiology. 1988;169:169–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Togashi K, Nishimura K, et al. Vaginal agenesis: classification by MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;162:675–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elsayes KM, Narra VR, et al. Vaginal masses: magnetic resonance imaging features with pathologic correlation. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:921–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saleem S. MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: current state of the art. Radiographics. 2003;23:e13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Junqueira B, Allen L, et al. Mullerian duct anomalies and mimics in children and adolescents: correlative intra-operative assessment with clinical imaging. Radiographics. 2009;29:1085–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fedele L, Bianchi S, et al. Laparoscopic findings and pelvic anatomy in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hugosson C, Jorulf H, et al. MRI in distal vaginal atresia. Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21:281–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez C, Balogun M, et al. MRI of vaginal conditions. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:648–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiaschetti V, Crusco S, et al. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: evaluation of retro-cervical space on MRI after vaginal opacification. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3638–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryu J, Kim B. MR imaging of the male and female urethra. Radiographics. 2001;21:1169–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hosseinzadeh K, Heller M, Houshmand G. Imaging of the female perineum in adults. RadioGraphics. 2012;32:E129–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hahn W, Israel G, Lee V. MRI of female urethral and periurethral disorders. Am Journal Rev. 2004;182:677–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Imai A, Furui T, et al. Leiomyoma and rhabdomyoma of the vagina. Vaginal myoma. J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;28:563–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shadbolt C, Coakley F, et al. MRI of vaginal leiomyomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25:355–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Narayanan P, Nobbenhuis M, et al. Fistulas in malignant gynecologic disease: etiology, imaging and management. Radiographics. 2009;29:1073–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parikh J, Desmond P, et al. MR imaging features of vaginal malignancies. Radiographics. 2008;28:49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Agrons G, Wagner B, et al. From the archives of the AFIP: genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma in children: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1997;17(4):919–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghaemmaghami F, Zarchi M, et al. Lower genital tract rhabdomyosarcoma: case series and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278:65–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garel L, Dubois J, et al. US of the pediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics. 2001;21:1393–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chassang M, Novellas S, et al. Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1003–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Ruchalski MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruchalski, K., Raman, S.S., Elsayes, K.M. (2015). The Vagina. In: Elsayes, K.M. (eds) Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Abdomen and Pelvis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1884-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1884-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1883-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1884-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics