Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Civil Aviation Crash Injury Protection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Accidental Injury

  • 3227 Accesses

Abstract

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has adopted safety requirements intended to protect aircraft occupants during survivable crash scenarios. These requirements include design specifications, static strength tests and dynamic impact tests of seats and restraint systems using instrumented Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATD). Two orientations of impact test are cited: a combined longitudinal/vertical test with the impact vector 60° from horizontal, and a longitudinal test with the impact vector yawed 10° from the centerline of the aircraft. Injury potential is assessed during the dynamic tests by comparing test results to a set of injury criteria. The static and dynamic test requirements vary by aircraft type due to the differences in energy transmitted to the seats. However, the injury criteria evaluated during these tests are very similar for all aircraft types. The criteria cited in the regulations are: the Head Injury Criteria (HIC), lumbar spine compressive load, shoulder strap load, femur compressive load (for passengers of transport aircraft only), a requirement that the seat belt not bear on the abdomen, and that the shoulder belts (if used) bear on the shoulder.

Side facing seats have unique injury risks. Therefore, tests using an ATD that can measure those risks (the ES-2re) are conducted to ensure that side facing seats provide the same level of safety as forward or aft-facing ones. The injury criteria originally developed to evaluate side impacts in autos have been cited in the aviation requirements, and include: HIC, rib lateral deflection, abdomen force, and pubic symphysis force. Because aircraft side-facing seats do not always provide full support for the occupant, additional criteria were developed to limit the risk of injuries caused by excessive excursion of the head, torso and legs. These criteria place limits on upper neck loads, femur twist angle, and torso flail, and prohibit significant contact between occupants of multi-place seats.

As new seat configurations and restraint technologies are introduced, additional criteria may be needed to ensure that these new systems provide the same level of safety as conventional seats and restraints. Advancements in biomechanics and injury mitigation technology have the potential to increase the level of safety for all aircraft occupants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Transportation Safety Board (2011) Review of U.S. Civil Aviation Accidents, NTSB/ARA-11/01

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Transportation Safety Board (2001) Survivability of accidents involving part 121 U.S. Air Carrier Operations, 1983 through 2000, NTSB SR01/01

    Google Scholar 

  3. NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia (2013) FARS Data Tables, Trends, Fatalities and Fatality Rates 1994–2012 - State : USA, Washington, DC. www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soltis S, Nissley W (1990) The development of dynamic performance standards for civil aircraft seats. Paper presented at the National Institute of Aviation Research, 1990 Aircraft Interiors Conference, Wichita State University, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coltman J, Bolukbasi A, Laananen D (1985) Analysis of rotorcraft crash dynamics for development of improved crashworthiness design criteria, DOT/FAA/CT-85/11

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Parts 23.561, 23.785, 25.561, 25.785, 27.561, 27.785, 29.561, 29.785. U.S. GPO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chandler RF (1993) Development of crash injury protection in civil aviation, Chapter 7. In: Nahum A, Melvin J (eds) Accidental injury, biomechanics and prevention, 1st edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Parts 23.562, 25.562, 27.562, 29.562. U.S. GPO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Part 121. Improved seats in air Carrier Transport Category Airplanes. U.S. GPO, Washington, DC; Final Rule; Federal Register 70(186):56542 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bandak F, Eppinger R (1994) A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human brain under combined rotational and translational accelerations. Stapp Car Crash J 38, Paper No. 942215

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chandler R (1985) Human injury criteria relative to civil aircraft seat and restraint systems. SAE International, Warrendale, SAE Paper 851847

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuppa S (2004) Injury criteria for side impact dummies. DOT/National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC; FMVSS-214 NPRM docket: NHTSA-2004-17694

    Google Scholar 

  13. (2008) The abbreviated injury scale 2005 – update 2008. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barrington

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49, Part 571.208. U.S. GPO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Takhounts E, Eppinger R et al (2003) On the development of the SIMon finite element head model. Stapp Car Crash J 47, Paper No. 03S-04

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iverson G, Gaetz M et al (2004) Cumulative effects of concussion in amateur athletes. Brain Inj 18(5):433–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eiband A (1959) Human tolerance to rapidly applied accelerations: a summary of the literature. NASA Memorandum 5-19-59E. NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henzel J (1967) The human spinal column and upward ejection acceleration: an appraisal of biodynamic implications. USAF Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, AMRL-TR-66-233

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stech E, Payne P (1969) Dynamic models of the human body, AMRL-TR-66-157. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brinkley J, Shaffer J (1971) Dynamic simulation techniques for the design of escape systems: current applications and future Air Force requirements. USAF Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, AMRL-TR-71-29

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gowdy R, Beebe M, Kelly R et al (1999) A lumbar spine modification to the Hybrid III ATD for aircraft seat tests. SAE International, Warrendale, SAE Paper 1999-01-1609

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Barth T, Balcena P (2010) Comparison of heart and aortic injuries to the head, neck, and spine injuries in US Army Aircraft accidents from 1983 to 2005. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society forum 66, Phoenix, 10–13 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuppa S, Wang J, Haffner M, Eppinger R (2007) Lower extremity injuries and associated injury criteria. DOT/National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. NHTSA paper no. 457

    Google Scholar 

  24. US Army (1989) US Army crash survival design guide, USAAVSCOM TR 89-D-22D Volume IV, Section 7.3.3

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marcus JH, Morgan RM, Eppinger RH, Kallieris D, Mattern R, Schmidt G (1983) Human response to and injury from lateral impact, SAE Paper No. 83163424

    Google Scholar 

  26. FAA (2012) FAA policy statement, PS-ANM-25-03-R1, Technical criteria for approving side-facing seats. DOT/Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  27. DeWeese R, Moorcroft D, Abramowitz A, Pellettiere J (2012) Civil aircraft side-facing seat research summary. DOT/Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC. FAA report no. DOT/FAA/AM-12/18

    Google Scholar 

  28. Philippens M, Forbes P, Wismans J, DeWeese R, Moorcroft D (2011) Neck injury criteria for side-facing aircraft seats. DOT/Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC. FAA report no. DOT/FAA/AR-09/41

    Google Scholar 

  29. DeWeese R, Moorcroft D, Green T, Philippens M (2007) Assessment of injury potential in aircraft side-facing seats using the ES-2 anthropomorphic test dummy. DOT/Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC. FAA report no. DOT/FAA/AM-07/13

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Humm J et al (2013) Neck injury criteria for side-facing aircraft seats – phase II. DOT/Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC. FAA report no. DOT/FAA/TC-12/44

    Google Scholar 

  31. Henry Dreyfuss Associates (2002) The measure of man and woman. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen J, Arcan M (2003) Modeling the human body/seat system in a vibration environment. J Biomech Eng 125:223–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. FAA (2006) FAA advisory circular 25.562-1B, dynamic evaluation of seat restraint systems and occupant protection on transport airplanes. U.S. GPO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Stemper D et al (2007) Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT responses in simulated far side impact. Stapp Car Crash J 51:313–360, Paper No. 2007-22-0014

    Google Scholar 

  35. Trimble E (1990) Report on the accident to Boeing 737-400 G-OBME near Kegworth, Leicestershire on 8 January 1989. Aircraft accident report 4/90. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yoganandan N, Pintar F et al (2005) Biomechanical aspects of blunt and penetrating head injuries, IUTAM Paper 011405

    Google Scholar 

  37. Grierson A, Jones L (2001) Recommendations for injury prevention in transport aviation accidents. SAE International, Warrendale, SAE Paper 2001-01-2658

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, OK, USA

    Richard L. DeWeese B.S. & David M. Moorcroft M.S.

  2. Aviation Safety, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, USA

    Joseph A. Pellettiere Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Richard L. DeWeese B.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Moorcroft M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph A. Pellettiere Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. DeWeese B.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

    Narayan Yoganandan

  2. School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, USA

    Alan M. Nahum

  3. Tandelta Inc., Ann Arbor, USA

    John W. Melvin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DeWeese, R.L., Moorcroft, D.M., Pellettiere, J.A. (2015). Civil Aviation Crash Injury Protection. In: Yoganandan, N., Nahum, A., Melvin, J. (eds) Accidental Injury. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1732-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1732-7_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1731-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1732-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation