Advertisement

Ethics in the Publishing of Archaeology

  • Mitchell Allen
Chapter
Part of the Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice book series (ETHARCHAEOL, volume 1)

Abstract

The ethics of archaeological publication mirror the quagmire of ethical questions that bedevils other parts of the discipline. This chapter outlines five key principles of ethical archaeological publishing in the context of these larger ethical issues. Archaeological information should be promptly published and that publication should usually, but not always, involve prior peer review. Archaeological authors must address multiple audiences, constituents, and stakeholders using language and media appropriate for them. They should maintain sensitivity to, and collaboration with, the communities from which the research was drawn. Despite the problems of the publishing establishment residing within a system of global capitalism, that system is pervasive, and scholars should consider how to accommodate it ethically as well as seek other sustainable publication options.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Indigenous Community Peer Review Process Archaeological Research Publication Outlet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, M., & Joyce, R. (2010). Communicating archaeology in the 21st century. In W. Ashmore, D. Lippert, & B. Mills (Eds.), Voices in American archaeology (pp. 270–290). Washington: SAA Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Wayyy (2011). The founding of America, published August 16. Retrieved September 3, 2012 from http://americanwayyy.blogspot.com/
  3. Bristow, K. (2010). The white apocalypse. Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, M. (1998). Can culture be copyrighted? Current Anthropology, 39(2), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cray, D., & Clemmons, M. (2011). Soaring stones: A kite-powered approach to building Egypt’s pyramids. Los Angeles: Delcominy Creations.Google Scholar
  6. Discovery Channel (2007). The lost tomb of Jesus. Retrieved September 4, 2012 from http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/tomb/tomb.html
  7. Fagan, G. (2006). Diagnosing pseudoarchaeology. In G. Fagan (Ed.), Archaeological fantasies (pp. 23–46). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Feather, J. (2007a). The British book market 1600-1800. In S. Eliot & J. Rose (Eds.), A companion to the history of the book (pp. 232–246). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Feather, J. (2007b). Copyright and literary property. In S. Eliot & J. Rose (Eds.), A companion to the history of the book (pp. 520–530). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Finkelstein, D., & McCleery, A. (2006). An introduction to book history. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hellinga, L. (2007). The Gutenberg revolutions. In S. Eliot & J. Rose (Eds.), A companion to the history of the book (pp. 207–219). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Hollowell, J., & Nicholas, G. (1998). Intellectual property issues in archaeological publication: Some considerations. Archaeologies, 4(2), 208–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kehoe, A. (2007). Controversies in archaeology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.Google Scholar
  14. Kroeber, A., Collier, D., & Schreiber, K. J. (1998). The archaeology and pottery of Nazca, Peru: Alfred Kroeber’s 1926 expedition. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  15. Lehner, M. (2008). The complete pyramids. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  16. Lekson, S. (1999). The Chaco meridian: Centers of political power in the Ancient Southwest. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  17. Little, B. (Ed.). (2002). Pubic benefits of archaeology. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  18. Nicholas, G.P., & Bannister, K. P. (2004) Copyrighting the past? Emerging intellectual property rights issues in archaeology, Current Anthropology, 45(3), 327–350.Google Scholar
  19. Odyssey Marine Exploration (2012). Retrieved September 8, 2012 from http://www.shipwreck.net/archaeology.php
  20. Oxford University Press (2011). Annual report of the delegates of the University Press, 2010–2011. Retrieved September 3, 2012 from http://fds.oup.com/www.oup.com/pdf/OUP_Annual_Report_2010-11.pdf
  21. Phillips, D. (n.d.). The Chaco Meridian: A skeptical analysis. Retrieved January 1, 2012 from http://www.unm.edu/~dap/meridian/meridian-text.html
  22. Smith, C. (2004) On intellectual property rights in archaeology, Current Anthropology, 45(4), 527.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, G., Messenger, P. M., & Soderland, H. (Eds.). (2010). Heritage values in contemporary society. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.Google Scholar
  24. Stanford, D. (1997). Interview with Dennis Stanford. Retrieved January 1, 2013 from http://www.oocities.org/latrinchera2000/articulos/stanford.html
  25. Stanford, D., & Bradley, B. (2012). Across Atlantic ice: The origin of America’s Clovis culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. The Economist (2011). Of goats and headaches, published 5/26/11. Retrieved September 3, 2012 from http://www.economist.com/node/18744177
  27. Zorn, J. (n.d.). Tel en-Nasbeh: Biblical Mizpah of Benjamin. Retrieved September 8, 2012 from http://www.arts.cornell.edu/jrz3/frames2.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Left Coast Press, IncWalnut CreekUSA

Personalised recommendations