Skip to main content

Introduction: The Only Way is Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence

Part of the book series: Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice ((ETHARCHAEOL,volume 2))

Abstract

Working in conflict and post-conflict environments presents a number of distinctive challenges for archaeologists. Elements of archaeological practice that are usually thought of as reasonably routine (such as safety), can become extremely problematic. Meanwhile the aspects of archaeological work that are generally understood to be problematic, such as the recovery of human remains and working with indigenous communities, are imbued with even greater significance and risk. Archaeologies of violence transform critical practices from an intellectual exercise into a practical necessity. In this context it is reasonable to argue that archaeologies of violence require a uniquely comprehensive and critical approach to ethics. In this chapter we review some crucial topics that will be discussed throughout the volume, such as types of violence, temporality, the relationship with communities and the general responsibilities of archaeologists working in conflict zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allhoff, F. (2011). Physicians at war: Lessons for archaeologists? In P. Stone (Ed.), Cultural heritage, ethics, and the military (pp. 43–54). Woodbridge, England: Boydell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B. (1990). The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity, 64(244), 464–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernbeck, R. (2008). Structural violence in archaeology. Archaeologies, 4(3), 390–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernbeck, R., & Pollock, S. (1996). Ayodhya, archaeology, and identity. Current Anthropology, 37(1), 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernbeck, R., & Pollock, S. (2007). “Grabe, wo du stehst!” An archaeology of perpetrators. In Y. Hamilakis & P. Duke (Eds.), Archaeology and capitalism: From ethics to politics (pp. 217–233). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevernage, B. (2008). Time, presence, and historical injustice. History and Theory, 47(2), 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birth, K. (2008). The creation of coevalness and the danger of homochronism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, S. (2014). Working as a forensic archaeologist and/or anthropologist in post-conflict contexts: A consideration of professional responsibilities to the missing, the dead and their relatives. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J., & Carman, P. (2006). Bloody meadows: Investigating landscapes of battle. Stroud, England: History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colls, C. S. (2012). Holocaust archaeology: Archaeological approaches to landscapes of Nazi genocide and persecution. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 7(2), 70–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., & Ferguson, T. J. (2006). Trust and archaeological practice: Towards a framework of virtue ethics. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology: Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 115–130). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Congram, D. (2014). Cognitive dissonance and the military-archaeology complex. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, Z. (2000). Buried lives: Forensic archaeology and the disappeared in Argentina. Archaeological Dialogues, 7(2), 146–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. (2009). Relations between archaeologists and the military in the case of Iraq. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 19, 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the New International. New York, NY: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezhamkhooy, M., Yazdi, L. P., & Garazhian, O. (2014). All our findings are under their boots! The monologue of violence in Iranian archaeology. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domanska, E. (2005). Toward the Archaeontology of the dead body. Rethinking History, 9(4), 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the other: How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrándiz, F. (2006). The return of Civil War ghosts: The ethnography of exhumations in contemporary Spain. Anthropology Today, 22(3), 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorato, V., Boylston, A., & Knüsel, C. (Eds.). (2000). Blood red roses: The archaeology of a mass grave from the Battle of Towton AD 1461. Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flatman, J. (2007). The origins and ethics of maritime archaeology—Part 1. Public Archaeology, 6(2), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giblin, J. (2014). Archaeological ethics and violence in post-genocide Rwanda. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilead, I., Haimi, Y., & Mazurek, W. (2009). Excavating Nazi extermination centres. Present Pasts, 1, 10–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Ruibal, A. (2007). Making things public: Archaeologies of the Spanish Civil War. Public Archaeology, 6(4), 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ruibal, A., Sahle, Y., & Ayán, X. (2011). A social archaeology of colonial war in Ethiopia. World Archaeology, 43(1), 40–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhand, J. (2000). Research in conflict zones: Ethics and accountability. Forced Migration Review 8, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (1999). La trahison des archéologues? Archaeological practice as intellectual activity in postmodernity. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 12(1), 60–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2003). Iraq, stewardship and “the record:” An ethical crisis for archaeology. Public Archaeology, 3, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y., & Duke, P. (Eds.). (2007). Archaeology and capitalism: From ethics to politics. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. (2014). Virtues impracticable and extremely difficult: The human rights of subsistence diggers. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, M. (2008). Archaeological research in conflict areas: Practice and responsibilities. Archaeologies, 4(3), 460–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollowell, J. (2006). Moral arguments on subsistence digging. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology: Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 69–93). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Innerarity, D. (2001). Ética de la hospitalidad. Barcelona, Spain: Península.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Dual Loyalty Working Group, Physicians for Human Rights (US), University of Cape Town School of Public Health & Primary Health Care. (2008). Dual loyalty and human rights in health professional practice. Proposed guidelines & institutional mechanisms. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New , 41:15–38.

  • Iregren, E. (2004). Humans in wrecks: An ethical discussion on marine archaeology, exhibitions and scuba diving. In H. Karlsson (Ed.), Swedish archaeologists on ethics (pp. 265–286). Lindome, Sweden: Bricoleur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, J. G. (1971). On ethics and anthropology. Current Anthropology, 12(3), 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, H. (Ed.). (2004). Swedish archaeologists on ethics. Lindome, Sweden: Bricoleur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kola, A. (2000). Bełżec, the Nazi camp for Jews in the light of archaeological sources: Excavations 1997-1999. Warsaw: Council for the Protection of Memory of Combat and Martyrdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Mazz, J. M. (2014). Archaeology of historic conflicts, colonial oppression and political violence in Uruguay. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S. (2011). Illicit deals in cultural objects as crimes of the powerful. Crime, Law and Social Change, 56(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, D. (1998). The ethics of archaeology, subsistence digging, and artifact looting in Latin America: Point muted counterpoint. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7(1), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L., & Pels, P. (Eds.). (2005). Embedding ethics. Oxford, England: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshenska, G. (2008). Ethics and ethical critique in the archaeology of modern conflict. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(2), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshenska, G. (2009). Contested pasts and community archaeologies: Public engagement in the archaeology of modern conflict. In N. Forbes, R. Page, & G. Pérez (Eds.), Europe’s deadly century: Perspectives on 20th century conflict heritage (pp. 73–79). London: English Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshenska, G. (2013). Conflict. In P. Graves-Brown, R. Harrison, & A. Piccini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the contemporary world (pp. 351–363). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshenska, G. (2014). The ethics of public engagement in the archaeology of modern conflict. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T., & Witmore, C. (2012). Archaeology: The discipline of things. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pluciennik, M. (2001). Introduction: The responsibilities of archaeologists. In M. Pluciennik (Ed.), The responsibilities of archaeologists: Archaeology and ethics (pp. 1–8). Oxford, England: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S., & Bernbeck, R. (2014). A gate to a darker world: Excavating at the Tempelhof airport (Berlin). In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. (2006). Orphan heritage: Issues in managing the heritage of the Great War in Northern France and Belgium. In T. Pollard & I. Banks (Eds.), Past tense: Studies in the archaeology of conflict (pp. 181–196). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. (2009). Response to “relations between archaeologists and the military in the case of Iraq.”. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 19, 9–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, H. (2006). The master plan: Himmler’s scholars and the Holocaust. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, L. (2011). Exhuming loss: Memory, materiality and mass graves of the Spanish Civil War. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runia, E. (2006). Presence. History and Theory, 45(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, L. (Ed.). (2010). Archaeology, cultural property and the military. Woodbridge, England: Boydell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, L. (2014). Military advocacy of peaceful approaches for cultural property protection. In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, M., & Zarankin, A. (2014). “Everything is kept in memory.” Reflections on the memory sites of the dictatorship in Buenos Aires (Argentina). In A. González-Ruibal & G. Moshenska (Eds.), Ethics and the archaeology of violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarre, G. (2006). Can archaeology harm the dead? In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology: Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 181–198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scarre, C., & Scarre, G. (Eds.). (2006). The ethics of archaeology: Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J., Johnson, W., & Beck, C. (Eds.). (2002). Material culture: The archaeology of 20th century conflict. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezneva, O. (2007). “We have never been German”: The economy of digging in Russian Kaliningrad. In C. Calhoun & R. Sennett (Eds.), Practicing culture (pp. 13–34). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. (2008). Archaeology and the forensic investigation of recent mass graves: Ethical issues for a new practice of archaeology. Archaeologies, 4(3), 414–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. (Ed.). (2011). Cultural heritage, ethics, and the military. Woodbridge, England: Boydell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2006). Archaeological ethics and the people of the past. In C. Scarre & G. Scarre (Eds.), The ethics of archaeology: Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice (pp. 199–216). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vitelli, K., & Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. (Eds.). (2006). Archaeological ethics. Oxford, England: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. (2003). Archaeological ethics and American Indians. In L. Zimmerman, K. Vitelli, & J. Hollowell-Zimmer (Eds.), Ethical issues in archaeology (pp. 57–69). Oxford, England: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (2005). The promise and perils of an ethic of stewardship. In L. Meskell & P. Pels (Eds.), Embedding ethics (pp. 47–68). Oxford, England: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachrisson, I. (2004). Archaeology and ethics: The South Sami example. In H. Karlsson (Ed.), Swedish archaeologists on ethics (pp. 117–131). Lindome, Sweden: Bricoleur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, L., Vitelli, K., & Hollowell-Zimmer, J. (Eds.). (2003). Ethical issues in archaeology. Oxford, England: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo González-Ruibal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moshenska, G., González-Ruibal, A. (2015). Introduction: The Only Way is Ethics. In: González-Ruibal, A., Moshenska, G. (eds) Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1643-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics