Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men in the United States of America. Radical prostatectomy is the most common treatment for localized prostate cancer. The goals of radical prostatectomy are to achieve cancer control, maintain continence, and preserve potency.
Since its introduction in 1999, the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) has become an integral tool in urologic surgery. Robot assistance reduced many of the challenges associated with laparoscopic prostatectomy with the result that Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was rapidly adopted for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Currently, more than 75 % of radical prostatectomies are performed robotically.
Advantages of the robotic system include improved ergonomics, wristed instrumentation, and magnified, three-dimensional visualization facilitating suturing and dissection during minimally invasive prostatectomy.
The robotic system consists of three components: the Surgeon Console, Patient Side Cart, and Video Tower. A dedicated robotic team aids in improving surgical efficiency while an assistant skilled in minimally invasive and robotic surgery is important in achieving optimal outcomes in robotic prostatectomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Suggested Reading
Beck SM, Skarecky D, Miller S, Ahlering TE. Athermal tension adjustable suture ligation of the vascular pedicle during robot-assisted prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26:834–7.
Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Palmer KJ, et al. Techniques of Nerve-Sparing and Potency Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2010;36:259–72.
Correa JJ, Pow-Sang JM. Optimizing Cancer Control and Functional Outcomes Following Robotic Prostatectomy. Cancer Control. 2010;17:233–44.
Ghani KR, Trinh Q, Menon M. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy-Technique. J Endourol. 2012;2012: 1558–65.
Turpen R, Atalah H, Su L. Tecchnical Advances in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol. 2010;1:251–8.
Vora AA, Dajani D, Lynch JH, Kowalczyk KJ. Anatomic and Technical Considerations for Optimizing Recovery of Urinary Function during Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23:78–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khanna, R.V. (2015). Robotic Prostatectomy. In: Khanna, R., Bratslavsky, G., Stein, R. (eds) Surgical Techniques for Prostate Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1616-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1616-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1615-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1616-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)