Skip to main content

Impact of Magnetic Resonance Elastography on Liver Diseases: Clinical Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Magnetic Resonance Elastography

Abstract

MRE is a commercially available technique for quantitatively assessing liver shear stiffness. The premise of the examination is based on the observation that fibrosis is associated with elevated liver stiffness and significantly different from normal liver parenchyma. Increasingly, MRE plays a role in detection of liver fibrosis, prediction of decompensation of liver disease as well as in further workup of liver masses. Several novel applications of MRE may be possible allowing for its increased role in management of persons with chronic liver disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bell BP, Manos MM, Zaman A, Terrault N, Thomas A, Navarro VJ, et al. The epidemiology of newly diagnosed chronic liver disease in gastroenterology practices in the United States: results from population-based surveillance. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(11):2727–36. quiz 37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu B, Balkwill A, Reeves G, Beral V. Body mass index and risk of liver cirrhosis in middle aged UK women: prospective study. BMJ. 2010;340:c912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim WR, Brown Jr RS, Terrault NA, El-Serag H. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2002;36(1):227–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muir AJ, Trotter JF. A survey of current liver biopsy practice patterns. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;35(1):86–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Standish RA, Cholongitas E, Dhillon A, Burroughs AK, Dhillon AP. An appraisal of the histopathological assessment of liver fibrosis. Gut. 2006;55(4):569–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Everhart JE, Wright EC, Goodman ZD, Dienstag JL, Hoefs JC, Kleiner DE, et al. Prognostic value of Ishak fibrosis stage: findings from the hepatitis C antiviral long-term treatment against cirrhosis trial. Hepatology. 2010;51(2):585–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Castera L, Pinzani M. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: are we ready? Lancet. 2010;375(9724):1419–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Castera L, Forns X, Alberti A. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography. J Hepatol. 2008;48(5):835–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science. 1995;269(5232):1854–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin M, Chen J, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, Ehman RL. Abdominal magnetic resonance elastography. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;20(2):79–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Fidler JL, Sanderson SO, Kamath PS, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic fibrosis: emerging clinical applications. Hepatology. 2008;47(1):332–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee YJ, Lee JM, Lee JE, Lee KB, Lee ES, Yoon JH, et al. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39(2):326–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Runge JH, Bohte AE, Verheij J, Terpstra V, Nederveen AJ, van Nieuwkerk KM, et al. Comparison of interobserver agreement of magnetic resonance elastography with histopathological staging of liver fibrosis. Abdom Imaging. 2013;39(2):283–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xanthakos SA, Podberesky DJ, Serai SD, Miles L, King EC, Balistreri WF, et al. Use of magnetic resonance elastography to assess hepatic fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease. J Pediatr. 2014;164(1):186–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rouviere O, Yin M, Dresner MA, Rossman PJ, Burgart LJ, Fidler JL, et al. MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology. 2006;240(2):440–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(10):1207–13 e2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huwart L, Sempoux C, Salameh N, Jamart J, Annet L, Sinkus R, et al. Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology. 2007;245(2):458–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Asbach P, Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Braun J, Somasundaram R, Hamm B, et al. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(2):373–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Crespo S, Bridges M, Nakhleh R, McPhail A, Pungpapong S, Keaveny AP. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis using magnetic resonance elastography in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(5):652–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Venkatesh SK, Wang G, Lim SG, Wee A. Magnetic resonance elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(1):70–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Talwalkar JA, Kurtz DM, Schoenleber SJ, West CP, Montori VM. Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(10):1214–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S, Sarrazin C, Bojunga J, Zeuzem S, et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(4):960–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, Carvalho F, Allaix D, Merrouche W, et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology. 2010;51(3):828–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Talwalkar JA. Elastography for detecting hepatic fibrosis: options and considerations. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(1):299–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hines CD, Bley TA, Lindstrom MJ, Reeder SB. Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(3):725–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoon JH, Lee JM, Woo HS, Yu MH, Joo I, Lee ES, et al. Staging of hepatic fibrosis: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and shear wave elastography in the same individuals. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14(2):202–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Arena U, Vizzutti F, Corti G, Ambu S, Stasi C, Bresci S, et al. Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2008;47(2):380–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sagir A, Erhardt A, Schmitt M, Haussinger D. Transient elastography is unreliable for detection of cirrhosis in patients with acute liver damage. Hepatology. 2008;47(2):592–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Millonig G, Reimann FM, Friedrich S, Fonouni H, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW, et al. Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosis. Hepatology. 2008;48(5):1718–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S, Fonouni H, Golriz M, Mehrabi A, et al. Liver stiffness is directly influenced by central venous pressure. J Hepatol. 2010;52(2):206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang PE, Miquel R, Blanco JL, Laguno M, Bruguera M, Abraldes JG, et al. Idiopathic portal hypertension in patients with HIV infection treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(7):1707–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Serai SD, Wallihan DB, Venkatesh SK, Ehman RL, Campbell KM, Sticka J, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver in patients status-post fontan procedure: feasibility and preliminary results. Congenit Heart Dis. 2014;9(1):7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Venkatesh SK, Wang G, Teo LL, Ang BW. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver in healthy Asians: normal liver stiffness quantification and reproducibility assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee DH, Lee JM, Han JK, Choi BI. MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(5):1215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Burroughs AK, Thalheimer U. Hepatic venous pressure gradient in 2010: optimal measurement is key. Hepatology. 2010;51(6):1894–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bureau C, Metivier S, Peron JM, Selves J, Robic MA, Gourraud PA, et al. Transient elastography accurately predicts presence of significant portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27(12):1261–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Groszmann RJ, Wongcharatrawee S. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology. 2004;39(2):280–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lemoine M, Katsahian S, Ziol M, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Kazemi F, et al. Liver stiffness measurement as a predictive tool of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus or alcohol-related cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28(9):1102–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vizzutti F, Arena U, Romanelli RG, Rega L, Foschi M, Colagrande S, et al. Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45(5):1290–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lim JK, Groszmann RJ. Transient elastography for diagnosis of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis: is there still a role for hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement? Hepatology. 2007;45(5):1087–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Castera L, Le Bail B, Roudot-Thoraval F, Bernard PH, Foucher J, Merrouche W, et al. Early detection in routine clinical practice of cirrhosis and oesophageal varices in chronic hepatitis C: comparison of transient elastography (FibroScan) with standard laboratory tests and non-invasive scores. J Hepatol. 2009;50(1):59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kazemi F, Kettaneh A, N’Kontchou G, Pinto E, Ganne-Carrie N, Trinchet JC, et al. Liver stiffness measurement selects patients with cirrhosis at risk of bearing large oesophageal varices. J Hepatol. 2006;45(2):230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Venkatesh S, Rossman PJ, Grimm RC, Manduca A, et al. Feasibility of in vivo MR elastographic splenic stiffness measurements in the assessment of portal hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(1):122–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun HY, Lee JM, Han JK, Choi BI. Usefulness of MR elastography for predicting esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;39(3):559–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fleming KM, Aithal GP, Card TR, West J. All-cause mortality in people with cirrhosis compared with the general population: a population-based cohort study. Liver Int. 2012;32(1):79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh S, Fujii LL, Murad MH, Wang Z, Asrani SK, Ehman RL, et al. Liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensation, liver cancer, and death in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(12):1573–84 e1-2. quiz e88-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Asrani SK, Talwalkar JA, Kamath PS, Shah VH, Saracino G, Jennings L, et al. Role of magnetic resonance elastography in compensated and decompensated liver disease. J Hepatol. 2013;60(5):934–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Crespo G, Lens S, Gambato M, Carrion JA, Marino Z, Londono MC, et al. Liver stiffness 1 year after transplantation predicts clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent hepatitis C. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(2):375–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kamphues C, Klatt D, Bova R, Yahyazadeh A, Bahra M, Braun J, et al. Viscoelasticity-based magnetic resonance elastography for the assessment of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation. RoFo. 2012;184(11):1013–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee VS, Miller FH, Omary RA, Wang Y, Ganger DR, Wang E, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography and biomarkers to assess fibrosis from recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011;92(5):581–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Araoz PA, Talwalkar JA, et al. MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(6):1534–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Koshiishi T, Sano K, Morisaka H, Ichikawa S, et al. Liver stiffness measured by magnetic resonance elastography as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary case-control study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Anaparthy R, Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Roberts LR, Fidler JL, Ehman RL. Liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography is not associated with developing hepatocellular carcinoma in subjects with compensated cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(1):83–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Garteiser P, Doblas S, Daire JL, Wagner M, Leitao H, Vilgrain V, et al. MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(10):2169–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Oki E, Kakeji Y, Taketomi A, Yamashita Y, Ohgaki K, Harada N, et al. Transient elastography for the prediction of oxaliplatin-associated liver injury in colon cancer patients: a preliminary analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2008;39(1–4):82–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayant A. Talwalkar M.D., M.P.H. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asrani, S.K., Talwalkar, J.A. (2014). Impact of Magnetic Resonance Elastography on Liver Diseases: Clinical Perspectives. In: Venkatesh, S., Ehman, R. (eds) Magnetic Resonance Elastography. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1575-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1575-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1574-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1575-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics