Abstract
With the absence of any legal text to impose any rational approach to formulate, implement, and evaluate public policies in Iraq, official decision makers and policy drafters tend to improvise as they can’t be held responsible for whatever policies they draft and/or adopt. The inevitable results of such a demerit are inefficient public services delivery, corrupted public sector known for being one of the most corrupted in the world, and thus unsatisfied citizens. What is really needed for the federal and local governments of Iraq to enhance their performance is unified legally binding conceptual and procedural models for formulating, implementing, and evaluating public policies they adopt to address Iraq’s public issues. This chapter is an applied study of the public policy making process currently practiced in Iraq. It, in addition, reviews and elaborates on the relevant legal framework of Iraq. It also presents and recommends a rational conceptual model specially customized for this country’s situation to be legislated and adopted by Iraqi governments. It also recommends translating this conceptual model into a procedural model by which clear responsibilities and specific time-frames are explained and imposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Decrees by the Council of Ministers.
- 2.
The Iraqi Legal Database/I.L.D. was created by the UNDP-Iraq in cooperation with the Supreme Judicial Council of Iraq and the Iraqi Ministry of Justice, can be browsed through http://www.iraq-ild.org.
- 3.
Law 28/1940 of “the Principles of Public Accounting.”
- 4.
This happens usually when authorities consider the emerging issue as a non-public issue, meaning that they decide that it doesn’t belong to the public, rather it belongs to a specific group of people such as a corporate in the case of corporate issues and policies.
- 5.
According to the Iraqi Minister of Finance, Dr. Rafi Al Essawi’s announcement in 2012.
- 6.
“Iraqi Ministries’ Needs Assessment for Public Policy Bureaus” by TARABOT (a USAID-Iraq project).
References
Althaus, C., Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2007). The Australian policy handbook (4th ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Anderson, J. E. (1999). Public policymaking (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Atkinson, M., Jones, M., & Lamont, E. (2007). Multi-agency working and its implication for practice – a review of the literature. CfBT Education Trust.
Buşoi, C. S. (2010). Health systems and the influence of political ideologies. Management in Health, 14(2).
Cochran, G. E., Mayer, L. C., Carr, T. R., & Cayer, N. J. (1982). American public policy: An introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Etzoni, A. (1967). Mixed scanning: A third approach to decision making. Public Administration Review, 27(5). Blackwell Publishing on behalf of ASPA.
Fox, C., & Butler, G. (2004). Partnerships: Where next? Safer Communities, 3(3), 36–44.
Kovacic, W. E. (2005). Using evaluation to improve the performance of competition policy authorities. OECD/Competition Committee. DAF/COMP(2005)23.
Palumbo, D. J., Fawcett, S. B., & Wright, P. (1981). Evaluating and optimizing public policy (pp. ix–xv). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Al-Hashimi, K. (2015). Iraq’s Pressing Need to Legally Binding Conceptual and Procedural Models for Public Policy Making. In: Dawoody, A. (eds) Public Administration and Policy in the Middle East. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 9. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1553-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1553-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1552-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1553-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)