Regulatory Macrophages and the Maintenance of Homeostasis

  • David M. Mosser
  • C. Andrew Stewart
Chapter

Abstract

Macrophages are a physiologically diverse collection of cells whose function can vary tremendously depending upon their anatomical location and the stimuli to which they are exposed. The plasticity of macrophages allows them to assume diametrically opposed physiologies and their ability to rapidly change their physiology in response to environmental cues permits these cells to be major mediators of homeostasis. On one hand macrophages can produce toxic mediators that can kill pathogens and promote immune responses. On the other, they can inhibit immune responses and orchestrate wound healing and tissue repair. The fact that macrophages with opposite physiologies can exist in an organism argues that a strategy to deplete macrophages would likely be ineffective, because it would deplete cells on both ends of the spectrum. In order to focus attention on the diverse roles of these cells, several investigators have attempted to assign names associated with given functional states, despite the fact that most acknowledge that these states can rapidly change. In fact, we once suggested that assigning a functional name to a rapidly changing population of macrophages was analogous to “assigning a color to a chameleon,” only to discover that no fewer than two other groups had previously made similar analogies. The assigning of names to macrophage populations based on their major activity, limitations notwithstanding, allows investigators to identify these cells in tissue or to direct drugs to specific subpopulations of macrophages in order to modulate immune responses. In this chapter we consider “regulatory macrophages” to be a broad general category of macrophages that are grouped by their functional activity. These activities include mitigating inflammation, regulating immune responses, and perhaps participating in tissue regeneration. We do not imply that all regulatory macrophages are identical. Rather, we propose that phenotypically diverse regulatory macrophages arise in response to a variety of exogenous and endogenous stimuli. We propose that all these regulatory macrophages share a common regulatory gene expression program leading to a reduced production of inflammatory mediators, and increased production of immunoregulatory cytokines and growth factors. We propose that these cells are major mediators of homeostasis and that without regulatory macrophages normal immune/inflammatory responses would invariably progress to immunopathology. Finally, we suggest that a part of the standard response of macrophages to inflammatory stimuli is the gradual transition from an inflammatory to a regulatory macrophage. This implies that macrophages can regulate their own physiology.

Keywords

Surfactant Hydrolysis Adenosine Retina Prostaglandin 

References

  1. Bersani I, Kunzmann S, Speer CP (2013) Immunomodulatory properties of surfactant preparations. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther 11:99–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cavaillon JM, Adib-Conquy M (2006) Bench-to-bedside review: endotoxin tolerance as a model of leukocyte reprogramming in sepsis. Crit Care 10:233PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen HB, Briggs KT, Marino JP, Ravid K, Robson SC, Mosser DM (2013) TLR stimulation initiates a CD39-based autoregulatory mechanism that limits macrophage inflammatory responses. Blood 122:1935–45Google Scholar
  4. Cramer T, Yamanishi Y, Clausen BE, Forster I, Pawlinski R, Mackman N, Haase VH, Jaenisch R, Corr M, Nizet V, Firestein GS, Gerber HP, Ferrara N, Johnson RS (2003) HIF-1alpha is essential for myeloid cell-mediated inflammation. Cell 112:645–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards JP, Zhang X, Frauwirth KA, Mosser DM (2006) Biochemical and functional characterization of three activated macrophage populations. J Leukoc Biol 80:1298–1307PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards JP, Zhang X, Mosser DM (2009) The expression of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor by regulatory macrophages. J Immunol 182:1929–1939PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erlebacher A (2013) Immunology of the maternal-fetal interface. Annu Rev Immunol 31:387–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleetwood AJ, Lawrence T, Hamilton JA, Cook AD (2007) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and macrophage CSF-dependent macrophage phenotypes display differences in cytokine profiles and transcription factor activities: implications for CSF blockade in inflammation. J Immunol 178:5245–5252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freudenberg MA, Galanos C (1988) Induction of tolerance to lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-D-galactosamine lethality by pretreatment with LPS is mediated by macrophages. Infect Immun 56:1352–1357PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Goerdt S, Orfanos CE (1999) Other functions, other genes: alternative activation of antigen-presenting cells. Immunity 10:137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heikkinen J, Mottonen M, Komi J, Alanen A, Lassila O (2003) Phenotypic characterization of human decidual macrophages. Clin Exp Immunol 131:498–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones CV, Williams TM, Walker KA, Dickinson H, Sakkal S, Rumballe BA, Little MH, Jenkin G, Ricardo SD (2013) M2 macrophage polarisation is associated with alveolar formation during postnatal lung development. Respir Res 14:41PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kellett DN (1966) 2-Deoxyglucose and inflammation. J Pharm Pharmacol 18:199–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis CE, Pollard JW (2006) Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Res 66:605–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. London A, Itskovich E, Benhar I, Kalchenko V, Mack M, Jung S, Schwartz M (2011) Neuroprotection and progenitor cell renewal in the injured adult murine retina requires healing monocyte-derived macrophages. J Exp Med 208:23–39PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lucas M, Zhang X, Prasanna V, Mosser DM (2005) ERK activation following macrophage FcgammaR ligation leads to chromatin modifications at the IL-10 locus. J Immunol 175:469–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacKenzie KF, Clark K, Naqvi S, McGuire VA, Noehren G, Kristariyanto Y, van den Bosch M, Mudaliar M, McCarthy PC, Pattison MJ, Pedrioli PG, Barton GJ, Toth R, Prescott A, Arthur JS (2013) PGE(2) induces macrophage IL-10 production and a regulatory-like phenotype via a protein kinase A-SIK-CRTC3 pathway. J Immunol 190:565–577PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mantovani A, Sica A (2010) Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol 22:231–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mantovani A, Biswas SK, Galdiero MR, Sica A, Locati M (2013) Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling. J Pathol 229:176–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Monneret G, Finck ME, Venet F, Debard AL, Bohe J, Bienvenu J, Lepape A (2004) The anti-inflammatory response dominates after septic shock: association of low monocyte HLA-DR expression and high interleukin-10 concentration. Immunol Lett 95:193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Munoz C, Carlet J, Fitting C, Misset B, Bleriot JP, Cavaillon JM (1991) Dysregulation of in vitro cytokine production by monocytes during sepsis. J Clin Invest 88:1747–1754PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nemeth ZH, Lutz CS, Csoka B, Deitch EA, Leibovich SJ, Gause WC, Tone M, Pacher P, Vizi ES, Hasko G (2005) Adenosine augments IL-10 production by macrophages through an A2B receptor-mediated posttranscriptional mechanism. J Immunol 175:8260–8270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollard JW (2009) Trophic macrophages in development and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9:259–270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodriguez-Prados JC, Traves PG, Cuenca J, Rico D, Aragones J, Martin-Sanz P, Cascante M, Bosca L (2010) Substrate fate in activated macrophages: a comparison between innate, classic, and alternative activation. J Immunol 185:605–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shynlova O, Nedd-Roderique T, Li Y, Dorogin A, Nguyen T, Lye SJ (2013) Infiltration of myeloid cells into decidua is a critical early event in the labour cascade and post-partum uterine remodelling. J Cell Mol Med 17:311–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stein M, Keshav S, Harris N, Gordon S (1992) Interleukin 4 potently enhances murine macrophage mannose receptor activity: a marker of alternative immunologic macrophage activation. J Exp Med 176:287–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strassmann G, Patil-Koota V, Finkelman F, Fong M, Kambayashi T (1994) Evidence for the involvement of interleukin 10 in the differential deactivation of murine peritoneal macrophages by prostaglandin E2. J Exp Med 180:2365–2370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sutterwala FS, Noel GJ, Clynes R, Mosser DM (1997) Selective suppression of interleukin-12 induction after macrophage receptor ligation. J Exp Med 185:1977–1985PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sutterwala FS, Noel GJ, Salgame P, Mosser DM (1998) Reversal of proinflammatory responses by ligating the macrophage Fcgamma receptor type I. J Exp Med 188:217–222PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tidball JG, Villalta SA (2010) Regulatory interactions between muscle and the immune system during muscle regeneration. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 298:R1173–R1187PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wall EA, Zavzavadjian JR, Chang MS, Randhawa B, Zhu X, Hsueh RC, Liu J, Driver A, Bao XR, Sternweis PC, Simon MI, Fraser ID (2009) Suppression of LPS-induced TNF-alpha production in macrophages by cAMP is mediated by PKA-AKAP95-p105. Sci Signal 2:ra28PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang X, Edwards JP, Mosser DM (2006) Dynamic and transient remodeling of the macrophage IL-10 promoter during transcription. J Immunol 177:1282–1288PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Mosser
    • 1
  • C. Andrew Stewart
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, The Maryland Pathogen Research InstituteUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.LeukoSight, Inc.College ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations