Advertisement

Beam–Beam Effects

  • V. ShiltsevEmail author
  • A. Valishev
Chapter
Part of the Particle Acceleration and Detection book series (PARTICLE)

Abstract

Beam–beam effects became a subject of study as soon as there were colliders beginning with the first e+e− collider AdA in Frascati that started operating in 1962 and the first pp collider ISR at CERN that started operating in 1971. Over the years many different issues related to electromagnetic interactions of colliding beams have emerged. In the Tevatron collider, the beam–beam problems take place in the context of beam losses and emittance growth due to long-range and head-on interactions. A comparative review of beam–beam performance of a number of hadron colliders [1] shows that the beam parameters operationally achieved in the Tevatron correspond to record high incoherent tune shift due to collisions (the figure of merit of beam–beam interaction):
$$ \xi ={N}_{\mathrm{IP}}\frac{N_{\mathrm{p}}{r}_{\mathrm{p}}}{4\pi \varepsilon}\approx 0.025-0.030, $$

Keywords

Particle Loss Beam Interaction Emittance Growth Beam Loss Proton Lifetime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Sen, arXiv:1102.2432 (2010); also in ICFA Beam Dyn. Newslett. 52, 14–32 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Moore, A. Jansson, V. Shiltsev, JINST 4, P12018 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Sen et al., Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 041001 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Alexahin, in Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville (2005), p. 544Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Saritepe, G. Goderre, S. Peggs, in Frontiers of Particle Beams: Intensity Limitations, Springer, Lecture Notes in Physics (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Bharadwaj, et al., FNAL Preprint Fermilab-TM-1970 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Shiltsev et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 101001 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Valishev, et al., JINST 7, P12002 (2012); also arXiv:0906.0386 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Ivanov, et al., in Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Portland, OR (2003), p. 3062Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Alexahin, in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Albuquerque, NM (2007), pp. 3874–3876Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Valishev, G. Annala, V. Lebedev, R. Moore, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Albuquerque, NM (2007), p. 3922Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Syphers, Beam-Beam Tune Distributions with Differing Beam Sizes, Fermilab internal document Beams-Doc-3031 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel, in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada (2009), p. 1668Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Bagley, et al., FNAL Preprint Conf-96-392 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Michelotti, FNAL Preprint TM-1738 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Pasquinelli, A. Jansson, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 072803 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Alexahin, Preprint FERMILAB-PUB-00-120-T (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Sen et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 0410101 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. Shitsev et al., New J. Phys. 10, 043042 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. Shiltsev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 244801 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Tsyganov, A. Taratin, A. Zinchenko, Phys. Part. Nuclei 27, 279 (1996)ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. Shiltsev et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2, 071001 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Burov, G. Foster, V. Shiltsev, Fermilab Preprint FNAL-TM-2125 (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. Shiltsev et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 103501 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    X.-L. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 051002 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. Shiltsev, in Proceedings of BEAM’06 (Valencia, Spain), Yellow Report CERN-2007-002; G. Stancari, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 084802 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Pfeffer, G. Saewert, JINST 6, P11003 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Valishev, et al., in Proceedings of 2010 International Particle Accelerator Conference, Kyoto, Japan (2010), p. 2084Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Valishev, V. Shiltsev, in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada (2009), p. 2567Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Shatilov, Part. Accel. 52, 65 (1996)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Hirata, H. Moshammer, F. Ruggiero, KEK Report 92-117 (1992)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. Stern, J.F. Amundson, P.G. Spentzouris, A.A. Valishev, Fully 3D multiple beam dynamics processes simulation for the Tevatron. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 021003 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. Qiang, M.A. Furman, R.D. Ryne, J. Comp. Phys. 198, 278–294 (2004)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. Stern, et al., in Proceedings of IEEE PAC07, Albuquerque, NM (2007), p. 905Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    I.N. Nesterenko, E.A. Perevedentsev, A.A. Valishev, Phys. Rev. E, 65, 056502 (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Chao, Physics of Collective Beam Instabilities in High Energy Accelerators (Wiley, New York, 1993), pp. 56–60, 178–187, 333–360Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Valishev, et al., in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada (2009), p. 4230Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Accelerator Physics CenterFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryBataviaUSA

Personalised recommendations