Advertisement

Assessing Effort and Malingering with the Asian Client

  • Olga Cirlugea
Chapter

Abstract

The use of measures for the assessment of malingering with culturally diverse populations for whom validation data do not exist must be taken into consideration. In this chapter the most commonly used and/or researched measures that strive to assess for malingering are explored and research on these measures with Asians is discussed. Specifically, the Test of Memory Malingering; the Medical Symptom Validity Test and Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test; Digit Memory Test; MMPI and its Chinese version and MMPI-2 and its Korean version; the Rey 15 Items; the Digit Span; the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms; and the Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test are reviewed. Finally, evidence-based recommendations are provided for the assessment of malingering with the Asian client.

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Digit Span Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Delay Recall Elderly Nursing Home Resident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, L., Conder, R. L., Green, P., & Cox, D. R. (1997). CARB ‘97 manual for the computerized assessment of response bias. Durham, NC: CogniSyst.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 85–94.Google Scholar
  4. Armistead-Jehle, P. (2010). Symptom validity test performance in U.S. veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI. Applied Neuropsychology, 17(1), 52–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R. A., Buis, T., & Bacchiochi, J. R. (2000). Can the MMIP-2 validity scales detect depression feigned by experts? Assessment, 7(1), 55–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber-Rioja, V., Zottoli, T., Kucharski, L., & Duncan, S. (2009). The utility of the MMPI-2 Criminal Offender Infrequency (Fc) Scale in the detection of malingering in criminal defendants. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8(1), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI–2–RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2–Restructured Form) manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Benton, A. L., Esligner, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1981). Normative observations on neuropsychological test performances in old age. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 33–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benuto, L. (2013). Assessing effort & malingering with the Hispanic client. In L. Benuto (Ed.), Guide to psychological assessment with Hispanics (pp. 99–112). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry, D. T. R., Baer, R. A., & Harris, M. J. (1991). Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 11(5), 585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boey, K. W. (1985). The MMPI response pattern of Singapore Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 17(4), 377–383.Google Scholar
  12. Bowden, S. C., Shores, A. E., & Mathias, J. L. (2006). Does effort suppress cognition after traumatic brain injury: A re-examination of the evidence for the Word Memory Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 858–872.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A. M., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Butcher, J. N., Williams, C. L., Grham, J. R., Archer, R., Tellegen, A. M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Kaemmer, B. (1992). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—Adolescent Version (MMPI-A). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, A. S., & Kwok, I. (1999). Hong Kong List Learning Test: Manual and preliminary norm. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  16. Chang, S. (2006). Development of a test battery for assessing memory malingering in Hong Kong and its application on depressed patients (China). Dissertation Abstracts International, 68.Google Scholar
  17. Cheung, F. M. (1985). Cross-cultural considerations for the translation and adaptation of the Chinese MMPI in Hong Kong. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Recent advances in personality assessment (Vol. 8, pp. 131–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Cheung, F. M. (Ed.). (1986). The Chinese Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory (MMPI): Research and applications (Occasional Paper No. 12). Hong Kong: Centre for Hong Kong Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  19. Cheung, F. M., & Song, W. (1989). A review on the clinical applications of the Chinese MMPI. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1(3), 230–237. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheung, F. M., Song, W., & Butcher, J. N. (1991). An infrequency scale for the Chinese MMPI. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 648–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheung, F., Song, W., & Zhang, J. (1996). The Chinese MMPI–2: Research and applications in Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI–2: Research and clinical applications (pp. 137–161). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Chiu, V. Y., & Lee, T. C. (2002). Detection of malingering behavior at different levels of task difficulty in Hong Kong Chinese. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47(2), 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cho, S., Park, B., Ahn, C., & Shin, D. (1990). The effectiveness of random response set identification scale of MMPI profiles. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9, 184–191.Google Scholar
  24. Cramer, K. M. (1995). Comparing three new MMPI-2 randomness indices in a novel procedure for random profile derivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., Ober, B. A., et al. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test—second edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  26. Dykhouse, A. S. (2012). Examining sensitivity of Korean MMPI-2-RF validity scales to over-reporting and under-reporting of symptoms. Retrieved from http://condor.cmich.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/p1610-01coll1/id/3553/rec/7
  27. Garriga, M. (2007). Malingering in the clinical setting. Psychiatric Times, 24(3), 1–4.Google Scholar
  28. Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. B., & Green, P. (2007). Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Assessment, 14, 196–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. B., & Green, P. (2008). Differential sensitivity of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and MMPI-2 validity scales to memory complaints. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 1061–1079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2010). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting scales and RBS in assessing the veracity of memory complaints. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(4), 274–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gervais, R. O., Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2011). Associations between symptom validity test failure and scores on the MMPI-2-RF validity and substantive scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(5), 508–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Green, P. (2003). Green’s Word Memory Test for Windows: Users manual. Edmonton, AB: Author.Google Scholar
  33. Green, P. (2004). Green’s Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT): User’s manual. Edmonton, AB: Author.Google Scholar
  34. Green, P. (2006). NV-MSVT for Windows, Version 1.3. Edmonton, AB: Author.Google Scholar
  35. Green, P. (2007). Manual for the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test. Edmonton, AB: Author.Google Scholar
  36. Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., Gola, T., Donders, J., & Miller, L. (2002). The fake bad scale in atypical and severe closed head injury litigants. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(12), 1591–1600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gualtieri, C., & Johnson, L. (2006). Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(7), 623–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guy, L. S., Kwartner, P. P., & Miller, H. A. (2006). Investigating the M-FAST: Psychometric properties and utility to detect diagnostic specific malingering. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24(5), 687–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hahn, J. (2005). Faking bad and faking good by college students on the Korean MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 65–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Han, K. (1993). The use of the MMPI–2 in Korea: Inventory adaptation, equivalence evaluation, and initial validation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54.Google Scholar
  41. Han, K. (1996). Adaptations in Asia and Southeast Asia. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and clinical applications (pp. 67–218). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hiscock, C. K., Branham, J. D., & Hiscock, M. (1994). Detection of feigned cognitive impairment: The two-alternative forced choice method compared with selected conventional tests. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment, 16, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hiscock, M., & Hiscock, C. K. (1989). Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 967–974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Inman, T. H., Vickery, C. D., Berry, D. T. R., Lamb, D. G., Edwards, C. L., & Smith, G. T. (1998). Development and initial validation of a new procedure for evaluating adequacy of effort given during neuropsychological testing: The Letter Memory Test. Psychological Assessment, 10, 128–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Iverson, G., & Binder, L. (2000). Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, 829–858.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kim, I. J., Han, K., Lim, J., Lee, J., Min, B., & Moon, K. (2005). Korean MMPI-2 user manual. Seoul, Korea: Maumsarang.Google Scholar
  47. Larrabee, G. J. (1998). Somatic malingering on the MMPI and MMPI-2 in personal injury litigants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(2), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Larrabee, G. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 410–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lees-Haley, P. R., English, L. T., & Glenn, V. J. (1991). A fake bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports, 68, 203–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lim, J., & Butcher, J. N. (1996). Detection of faking on the MMPI-2: Differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(1), 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liu, R., Gao, B., Li, Y., & Sheng, L. (2001). Simulated malingering: A preliminary trial on Hiscock’s Forced-Choice Digit Memory Test. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9(3), 173–175.Google Scholar
  52. Marsella, A. J., Kinzie, D., & Gordon, P. (1971, March). Depressive patterns among American college students of Caucasian, Chinese, and Japanese ancestry. Paper presented at the Conference on Culture and Mental Health in Asia and the Pacific, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  53. Martens, M., Donders, J., & Millis, S. R. (2001). Evaluation of invalid response sets after traumatic head injury. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Megargee, E. I. (2004, May). Development and initial validation of an MMPI-2 infrequency scale (Fc) for use with criminal offenders. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments on the MMPI-2/MMPI-A, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  55. Messer, J., & Fremouw, W. (2008). Detecting malingered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder using the Morel Emotional Numbing Test-Revised (MENT-R) and the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 7(3), 33–57.Google Scholar
  56. Miller, H. A. (2001). M-FAST: Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, H. A. (2004). Examining the use of the M-Fast with criminal defendants incompetent to stand trial. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 268–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moore, B. A., & Donders, J. (2004). Predictors of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18(10), 975–984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morel, K. R. (1998). Manual for the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (MENT). Printed in USA.Google Scholar
  60. Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Tampa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  61. National MMPI Coordinating Group. (1982). The revision, employment and evaluation of MMPI in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 14, 449–458.Google Scholar
  62. National MMPI Coordinating Group. (1985). Analysis of results of MMPI on normal Chinese subjects. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 17, 346–355.Google Scholar
  63. O’Bryant, S. E., Engel, L. R., Kleiner, J. S., Vasterling, J. J., & Black, F. W. (2007). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) Trial 1 as a screening measure for insufficient effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rey, A. (1964). L’examen Clinique en Psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  65. Rogers, R. (1986). Structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS). Clarke Institute of Psychiatry: Toronto, Unpublished scale.Google Scholar
  66. Rogers, R. (1992). Structured interview of reported symptoms. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  67. Rogers, R. (1997). Current status of clinical methods. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 373–379). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  68. Rogers, R., Gillis, J., Bagby, R., & Monteiro, E. (1991). Detection of malingering on the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS): A study of coached and uncoached simulators. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3(4), 673–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rogers, R., Gillis, J., Dickens, S. E., & Bagby, R. (1991). Standardized assessment of malingering: Validation of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rogers, R., Hinds, J. D., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). Feigning psychopathology among adolescent offenders: Validation of the SIRS, MMPI-A, and SIMS. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(2), 244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Salekin, R. T. (1994). A meta-analysis of malingering on the MMPI-2. Assessment, 1(3), 227–237.Google Scholar
  72. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Gillard, N. D. (2010). Structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS) (2nd Ed., professional manual). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  73. Ross, S. R., Millis, S. R., Krukowski, R. A., Putnam, S. H., & Adams, K. M. (2004). Detecting incomplete effort on the MMPI-2: An examination of the Fake-Bad Scale in mild head injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 115–124 & 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rubenzer, S. (2010). Review of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2 (SIRS-2). Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 273–286.Google Scholar
  75. Ryder, A. G., Jian, Y., Xiongzhao, Z., Shuqiao, Y., Jinyao, Y., Heine, S. J., & Bagby, R. (2008). The cultural shaping of depression: Somatic symptoms in China, psychological symptoms in North America? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 300–313.Google Scholar
  76. Salazar, X. F., Lu, P. H., Wen, J., & Boone, K. B. (2007). The use of effort tests in ethnic minorities. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 405–427). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  77. Schipper, L. J., Berry, D. T. R., Coen, E., & Clark, J. A. (2008). Cross validation of a manual form of the Letter Memory Test using a known groups methodology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 345–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith, G. P. (1992). Detection of malingering: A validation study of the SLAM test. Unpublished dissertation, University of Missouri—St. Louis.Google Scholar
  79. Sollman, M. J., Ranseen, J. D., & Berry, D. R. (2010). Detection of feigned ADHD in college students. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 325–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Storandt, M., Botwinick, J., Danziger, W., Berg, L., & Hughes, C. P. (1984). Psychometric differentiation of mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 41, 497–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sue, S., Keefe, K., Enomoto, K., Durvasula, R., & Chao, R. (1996). Asian American and White college students’ performance on the MMPI-2. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and clinical applications (pp. 206–218). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  82. Sue, S., & Sue, D. W. (1974). MMPI comparisons between Asian-American and Non-Asian students utilizing a student health psychiatric clinic. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 21(5), 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Temple, R. O., McBride, A. M., Horner, M. D., & Taylor, R. M. (2003). Personality characteristics of patients showing suboptimal cognitive effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 402–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260–268.Google Scholar
  85. Tsushima, W. T., & Onorato, V. A. (1982). Comparison of MMPI scores of White and Japanese-American medical patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(1), 150–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tsushima, W. T., & Tsushima, V. G. (2002). Comparison of MMPI-2 scores of white and Japanese American medical patients. Advances in Medical Psychotherapy and Psychodiagnosis, 11, 1–8.Google Scholar
  87. Tsushima, W. T., & Tsushima, V. G. (2009). Comparison of MMPI-2 validity scales among compensation-seeking Caucasian and Asian American medical patients. Assessment, 6, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wechsler, D. (1990). Japanese Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised: Manual (F. Shinangawa, S. Kobayashi, K. Fujita, & H. Maekawa, Trans.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  89. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III: Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  90. Weinborn, M., Woods, S., Nulsen, C., & Leighton, A. (2012). The effects of coaching on the Verbal and Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(5), 832–849.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wetter, M. W., Baer, R. A., Berry, D. R., Smith, G. T., & Larsen, L. H. (1992). Sensitivity of MMPI-2 validity scales to random responding and malingering. Psychological Assessment, 4(3), 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yamaguchi, T. (2005). Detecting malingered memory impairment using the Rey 15-Item Memory Test and the Wechsler Digit Span subtest in a Japanese population. UMI Dissertation Services, ProQuest Information and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations