Abstract
Disorders of consciousness include coma, the vegetative state, the minimally conscious state and the post-traumatic confusional state. These conditions exist along a two-dimensional continuum comprised of arousal (i.e., wakefulness) and awareness (i.e., recognition of self and environment). Accurately characterizing and distinguishing these disorders early after onset is critically important as diagnosis is closely linked to prognosis and drives clinical decision-making. Unfortunately, published rates of misdiagnosed consistently approach 40 % with most of the error accounted for by failure to detect consciousness when it is preserved. Misdiagnosis may limit access to medical and rehabilitation services and lead to premature withdrawal of life-sustaining care. In this chapter, we describe a systematic, evidence-based framework for clinical management of patients with DoC. The primary aim is to demonstrate how a standardized, multi-tiered approach to assessment organized around a structured “care map” can be instituted in the rehabilitation setting to inform diagnostic, prognostic and treatment decisions, ultimately improving the consistency and effectiveness of care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Faul, M. X. L., Wald, M. M., & Coronado, V. (2010). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths, 2002-2006. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
Posner, J. B., & Plum, F. (2007). Plum and Posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma (4th ed., Vol. 14, 401p.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. (1994). Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). The New England Journal of Medicine, 330(21), 1499–1508.
Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. (1995). Practice parameters: Assessment and management of patients in the persistent vegetative state (summary statement). Neurology, 45(5), 1015–1018.
Giacino, J. T., Ashwal, S., Childs, N., Cranford, R., Jennett, B., Katz, D. I., et al. (2002). The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 58(3), 349–353.
Sherer, M., Nakase-Thompson, R., Yablon, S. A., & Gontkovsky, S. T. (2005). Multidimensional assessment of acute confusion after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(5), 896–904.
Sherer, M., Yablon, S. A., Nakase-Richardson, R., & Nick, T. G. (2008). Effect of severity of post-traumatic confusion and its constituent symptoms on outcome after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(1), 42–47.
Childs, N., Mercer, W., & Childs, H. (1993). Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology, 43(8), 1465–1467.
Andrews, K., Murphy, L., Munday, R., & Littlewood, C. (1996). Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: Retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ, 313(7048), 13–16.
Schnakers, C., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Giacino, J., Ventura, M., Boly, M., Majerus, S., et al. (2009). Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurology, 9, 35.
Giacino, J. T., Schnakers, C., Rodriguez-Moreno, D., Kalmar, K., Schiff, N., & Hirsch, J. (2009). Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: Gold standard or fool’s gold? Progress in Brain Research, 177, 33–48.
Dejong, G., Horn, S. D., Gassaway, J. A., Slavin, M. D., & Dijkers, M. P. (2004). Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(4), 678–686.
Lammi, M. H., Smith, V. H., Tate, R. L., & Taylor, C. M. (2005). The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: A follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(4), 746–754.
Katz, D. I., Polyak, M., Coughlan, D., Nichols, M., & Roche, A. (2009). Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: Outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up. Progress in Brain Research, 177, 73–88.
Estraneo, A., Moretta, P., Loreto, V., Lanzillo, B., Santoro, L., & Trojano, L. (2010). Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology, 75(3), 239–245.
Nakase-Richardson, R. W. J., Giacino, J. T., et al. (2012). Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI model systems programs. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29(1), 59–65.
Giacino, J. T., Kalmar, K., & Whyte, J. (2004). The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(12), 2020–2029.
DiPasquale, M. C. W. (1996). J. The use of quantitative data in treatment planning for minimally conscious patients. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11(6), 9.
Schnakers, C., Majerus, S., Giacino, J., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Bruno, M. A., Boly, M., et al. (2008). A French validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain Injury, 22(10), 786–792.
Lovstad, M., Froslie, K. F., Giacino, J. T., Skandsen, T., Anke, A., & Schanke, A. K. (2010). Reliability and diagnostic characteristics of the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Exploring the influence of rater’s level of experience. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25(5), 349–356.
Rappaport, M., Hall, K. M., Hopkins, K., Belleza, T., & Cope, D. N. (1982). Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63(3), 118–123.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2003). National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS): Adult speech-language pathology user’s guide. Rockville, MD: Author [Internet].
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., Spreen, O., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed., Vol. xvii). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 1216p.
Schiff, N. D., Giacino, J. T., Kalmar, K., Victor, J. D., Baker, K., Gerber, M., et al. (2007). Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature, 448(7153), 600–603.
Whyte, J., Nordenbo, A. M., Kalmar, K., Merges, B., Bagiella, E., Chang, H., et al. (2013). Medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation among patient with traumatic disorders of consciousness. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(10), 1877–1883.
Sander, A. M. (2007). Brain injury and the family. NeuroRehabilitation, 22(1), 1–2.
Sinnakaruppan, I., & Williams, D. M. (2001). Family carers and the adult head-injured: A critical review of carers’ needs. Brain Injury, 15(8), 653–672.
Gan, C., Campbell, K. A., Gemeinhardt, M., & McFadden, G. T. (2006). Predictors of family system functioning after brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(6), 587–600.
Bond, A. E., Draeger, C. R., Mandleco, B., & Donnelly, M. (2003). Needs of family members of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Implications for evidence-based practice. Critical Care Nurse, 23(4), 63–72.
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2(7872), 81–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giacino, J.T. et al. (2014). A Systematic and Evidence-Based Approach to Clinical Management of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness. In: Sherer, M., Sander, A. (eds) Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Traumatic Brain Injury. Clinical Handbooks in Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0784-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0784-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0783-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0784-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)