Skip to main content

The Evolving Nosology of Schizophrenia: Relevance for Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schizophrenia

Abstract

The purpose of nosological systems (i.e., systems of classifying disease) is to define distinct disease entities which are uniquely identifiable and specifically treatable. Consequently, validity, reliability, and clinical utility are three critical elements of a useful diagnostic system. Our system of psychiatric classification recently underwent a major revision, resulting in the publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 in 2013. Whereas improving validity and reliability of psychiatric diagnoses were key objectives in its development, enhancing clinical utility was the primary goal. With reference to psychotic disorders, changes in the new manual addressed limitations in DSM-IV while incorporating new information about the nature of these disorders generated over the past 20 years. With regard to schizophrenia, variation in distinct psychopathological dimensions is better able to account for the heterogeneity of this disorder than traditional subtypes. Therefore, changes in DSM-5 included elimination of the classic subtypes of schizophrenia and the addition of unique psychopathological dimensions. In view of the poor reliability and limited validity of schizoaffective disorder as defined in DSM-IV a clearer definition was provided in DSM-5. Additionally, the discrepant treatment of catatonia in DSM-IV has been corrected and it is now listed consistently across the DSM-5 manual. A new category of Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome is included in Section 3 as a condition for further study. In this chapter, the revisions in the DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders are summarized and their implications for clinical practice discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization. Manual of the international statistical classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death. Sixth Revision (ICD-6)th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 1 (DSM-I)th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5 (DSM-5)th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines (CDDG). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tandon R, Maj M. Nosological status and definition of schizophrenia. Some considerations for DSM-V and ICD-11. Asian J Psychiatr. 2008;1:22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tandon R, Keshavan MS, Nasrallah HA. Schizophrenia, “just the facts”. What we know in 2008. Part 1: overview. Schizophr Res. 2008;100:4–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kraepelin E. Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia, 1919. In: Robertson GM, editor. New York: Krieger; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox, or the group of Schizophrenias, 1911, translated by J. Zinkin. New York: International University Press; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tandon R, Carpenter WT. DSM-5 status of psychotic disorders: 1-year pre-publication. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:369–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaebel W, Zielasek J, Cleveland H-R. Psychotic disorders in ICD-11. Psychiatry. 2013;10:11–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoenig J. The concept of schizophrenia. Kraepelin-Bleuler-Schneider. Br J Psychiatry. 1983;142:547–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berrios GE, Beer M. The notion of unitary psychosis: a conceptual history. Hist Psychiatry. 1994;5:13–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barnes MP, Saunders M, Walls TJ, Saunders I, Kirk CA. The syndrome of Karl Ludwig Kahlbaum. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;41:991–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sedler MJ. Falret’s discovery (1854): the origin of the concept of bipolar affective illness, translated by MJ Sedler and Eric C Dessain. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140:1127–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sedler MJ. The legacy of Ewald Hecker, a new translation of Die Hebephrenie, translated by Mary Louise Schoelly. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142:1265–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jablensky A, Hugler H, von Cranach M, Kalinov K. Kraepelin revisited: a reassessment and statistical analysis of dementia praecox and manic-depressive insanity in 1908. Psychol Med. 1993;23:843–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider K. Clinical psychopathology, Translated by Hamilton MW. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wing JK, Cooper JE, Sartorius N. The measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  19. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 2 (DSM-II)th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kendell RD, Cooper JR, Gourlay AJ, et al. Diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1971;25:123–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3 (DSM-III)th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mellor CS. First rank symptoms of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 1970;117:15–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wing JK, Nixon J. Discriminating symptoms in schizophrenia: a report from the International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32:953–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tandon R. The nosology of schizophrenia: towards DSM-5 and ICD-11. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2012;35:555–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyatt RJ, Alexander RC, Egan MF, Kirch DG. Schizophrenia, just the facts. what do we know, how well do we know it. Schizophr Res. 1988;1:3–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tandon R. Moving beyond findings: concepts and model-building in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 1999;29:255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Keshavan MS, Nasrallah HA, Tandon R. Schizophrenia, “Just the Facts” 6. Moving ahead with the schizophrenia concept: from the elephant to the mouse. Schizophr Res. 2011;127:3–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Helmes E, Landmark J. Subtypes of schizophrenia: a cluster analytic approach. Can J Psychiatry. 2003;48:702–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tandon R, Nasrallah HA, Keshavan MS. Schizophrenia, “Just the Facts”. Part 4: clinical features and concept. Schizophr Res. 2009;110:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Braff DL, Ryan J, Rissling AJ, Carpenter WT. Lack of use in the literature in the last 20 years supports dropping traditional schizophrenia subtypes from DSM-5 and ICD-11. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(4):751–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tandon R, Gaebel W, Barch DM, et al. Definition and description of schizophrenia in DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Barch DM, Bustillo J, Gaebel W, et al. Logic and justification for dimensional assessment of symptoms and related phenomena in psychosis: relevance to DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tandon R. Schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders: DSM-5 revisions and their clinical implications. Psychopharm Rev. 2013;48:33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McGorry PD. Risk syndromes, clinical staging, and DSM V: new diagnostic infrastructure for early intervention in psychiatry. Schizophr Res. 2010;120:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsuang MT, van Os J, Tandon R, et al. Attenuated psychosis syndrome in DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:31–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tandon N, Shah J, Keshavan MS, Tandon R. Attenuated psychosis and the schizophrenia prodrome: current status of risk identification and psychosis prevention. Neuropsychiatry. 2012;2:345–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Carpenter WT, Strauss JS, Muleh S. Are there pathognomonic symptoms in schizophrenia. An empiric investigation of Schneider’s first-rank symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973;28:847–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nordgard J, Arnfred SM, Handest P, Parnas J. The diagnostic status of first-rank symptoms. Schizophr Bull. 2008;34:137–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ihara K, Morgan C, Fearon P, et al. The prevalence, diagnostic significance, and demographic characteristics of Schneiderian first-rank symptoms in an epidemiological sample of first-episode psychosis. Psychopathology. 2009;42:81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bell V, Halligan PW, Ellis HD. Diagnosing delusions: a review of inter-rater reliability. Schizophr Res. 2006;86:76–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tandon R, Bruijnzeel D, Rankupalli B. Does change in definition of psychotic symptoms in diagnosis of schizophrenia in DSM-5 affect caseness? Asian J Psychiatr. 2013;6:330–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Heckers S, Tandon R, Bustillo J. Catatonia in the DSM. Shall we move or not? Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:205–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tandon R, Heckers S, Bustillo J, et al. Catatonia in DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:26–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tandon R, Keshavan MS, Nasrallah HA. Schizophrenia, “Just the Facts”. What we know in 2008. Part 5: treatment and prevention. Schizophr Res. 2010;122:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tandon R, Targum SD, Nasrallah HA, Ross R. Strategies for maximizing clinical effectiveness in the treatment of schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Pract. 2006;12:348–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework in mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:748–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Insel TR. Rethinking schizophrenia. Nature. 2010;468:187–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Woods SW, Walsh BC, Saksa JR, McGlashan TH. The case for including attenuated psychotic symptoms syndrome in DSM-5 as a psychosis risk syndrome. Schizophr Res. 2010;123:199–207.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Clarke DE, et al. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:59–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tandon R. Antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: an overview. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72 Suppl 1:4–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tandon R, Carpenter WT. Psychotic disorders in DSM-5. Psychiatry. 2013;10:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kapur S, Phillips AG, Insel TR. Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it? Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:1174–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hyman SE. The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:155–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kupfer DJ, Regier DA. Neuroscience, clinical evidence, and the future of psychiatric classification in DSM-5. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:672–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tandon R. Definition of schizophrenia in the DSM-5: too radical, too conservative, or just right. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiv Tandon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tandon, R., Bruijnzeel, D. (2014). The Evolving Nosology of Schizophrenia: Relevance for Treatment. In: Janicak, P., Marder, S., Tandon, R., Goldman, M. (eds) Schizophrenia. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0656-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0656-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0655-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0656-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics