Skip to main content

Modernizing Democracy? Associations and Associating in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modernizing Democracy

Abstract

According to many approaches of modern democratic theory, a vibrant associational life plays a key role, and associations are often discussed as guarantors of the democratic commonwealth since they fulfill three important functions for the political system: They contribute to the social integration of the citizens; they act as transmission belts between the individual and the political decision makers through their lobbying function; and finally, in many countries, they play an important role in the provision of services, in particular in the social sector. However, the concrete importance of these functions is disputed, and there are many challenges facing associations and the act of associating in the twenty-first century. This chapter gives an overview and introduces the concept of the anthology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alscher, M., Dathe, D., Priller, E., & Speth, R. (2009). Bericht zur Lage und zu den Perspektiven des bürgerschaftlichen Engagements in Deutschland. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. (2005). Nonprofit organizations. Theory, management, policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 158–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMFSFJ (2010). Monitor engagement, Ausgabe 2. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Rogers, J. (1995). Associations and demoracy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social movements: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, B., & Foley, M. (2001). Civil society and social capital: A primer. In B. Edwards & M. Foley (Eds.), Beyond Tocqueville. Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective (pp. 1–16). Hanover: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freise, M., & Pajas, P. (2004). Organizational and legal forms of nonprofit organizations in Central Europe. In A. Zimmer & E. Priller (Eds.), Future of civil society. Making Central European nonprofit organizations work (pp. 129–146). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2003). Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes and realities. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 515–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of non-profit organizations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 27–42). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenborg, J., & Wilson, S. (Eds.). (1996). Voluntary associations in the Graeco-Roman world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimmer, H., & Priemer, J. (2013). ZiviZ-Survey 2012. Instrument und erste Ergebnisse. http://www.ziviz.info. Accessed 3 Jan 2014.

  • Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2012). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, M. E. (1967). Einrichtungen der sozialen Sicherung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Sicherung bei Krankheit. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priller, E., Alscher, M., Droß, P. J., Paul, F., Poldrack, C. J., Schmeißer, C., & Waitkus, N. (2012). Dritte-Sektor-Organisationen heute: Eigene Ansprüche und ökonomische Herausforderungen. Ergebnisse einer Organisationsbefragung. Berlin: WZB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, S. (2004). Civil society—a concept for comparative historical research. In A. Zimmer & E. Priller (Eds.), Future of civil society—making central European nonprofit-organizations work (pp. 11–27). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (1995). Partners in public service. Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (1998). Government-nonprofit relations in international perspective. In E. Boris & E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government. Collaboration and conflict (pp. 329–367). Washington: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the nonprofit sector II: The problem of classification (Working papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, No. 3). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Der Nonprofit-Sektor: Ein theoretischer Versuch. In H. K. Anheier, E. Priller, W. Seibel, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Der Dritte Sektor in Deutschland (pp. 211–257). Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibel, W. (1996). Successful failure. An alternative view on organizational coping. American Behavioral Scientist, 39(8), 1011–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J., & Transue, J. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. American Journal of Psychology, 50, 625–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. d. (1985 [1835/1840]). Über die Demokratie in Amerika. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. (2000). Democracy and association. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A. (2007). Vereine—Zivilgesellschaft konkret. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A., & Hallmann, T. (2005). Mit vereinten Kräften. Ergebnisse der Befragung „Vereine in Münster“. Münster: Zentrum für Nonprofit Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A., & Priller, E. (2004). Gemeinnützige Organisationen im gesellschaftlichen Wandel. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A., Basic, A., & Hallmann, T. (2011). Sport ist im Verein am schönsten? Analysen und Befunde zur Attraktivität des Sports für Ehrenamt und Mitgliedschaft. In T. Rauschenbach & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Bürgerschaftliches Engagement unter Druck? Analysen und Befunde aus den Bereichen Soziales, Kultur und Sport (pp. 269–385). Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Freise .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freise, M., Hallmann, T. (2014). Modernizing Democracy? Associations and Associating in the Twenty-First Century. In: Freise, M., Hallmann, T. (eds) Modernizing Democracy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0485-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics