Abstract
The study examined whether enabling preservice science teachers to use the TPCK-SRL model for integrating SRL (Self-Regulated Learning) into TPCK (Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge) influenced (a) beliefs about teaching and learning pedagogy, (b) self-efficacy beliefs in the context of using technology in the classroom, and (c) the extent to which these beliefs are connected to teachers’ TPCK-based lesson design. Two groups of teachers were compared (n = 96). One group practiced the TPCK-SRL model in a hypermedia environment, and the other practiced TPCK only in the same hypermedia environment. The findings indicated that after exposure to the TPCK-SRL training model, preservice teachers’ pedagogical beliefs tended more to favor student-centered learning (self-constructing knowledge) than the TPCK group. TPCK-SRL teachers also showed the strongest beliefs in their own technological self-efficacy, which influenced their ability to develop TPCK-based lesson designs in a constructivist way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–142.
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52, 154–168.
Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Brooks, J. G. (2002). Schooling for life: Reclaiming the essence of learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Cartier, S. C. (2013). Layers of self- and co-regulation: Teachers’ co-regulating learning and practice to foster students’ self-regulated learning through reading. Education Research International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/845694
Chan, K. W., & Elliot, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817–831.
Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.
Entwistle, N., Skinner, D., Entwistle, D., & Orr, S. (2000). Conceptions and beliefs about “good teaching”: An integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(1), 5–26.
Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
Graham, C. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1960.
Hashweh, M. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47–63.
Henson, R. (2002). From adolescent to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 137–150. Retrieved from Education Research Complete.
Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 455–465.
Jacobsen, D. M. (2002). Building different bridges two: A case study of transformative professional development for student learning with technology. Paper presented at AERA 2002: Validity and value in educational research, the 83rd annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge.
Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2012). Developing a TPCK-SRL assessment scheme for conceptually advancing technology in education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 1–8.
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: Effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281–310.
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, M. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers’ professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 161–175.
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20, 434–447.
Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181.
Lim, C. P., & Chan, B. C. (2007). Micro lessons in teacher education: Examining preservice teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers and Education, 48(4), 474–494.
Littrell, A., Zagumny, M., & Zagumny, L. (2005). Contextual and psychological predictors of instructional technology use in rural classrooms. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(2), 37–47.
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365–395.
Michalsky, T., & Kramarski, B. (2008). Effects of e-learning on self-regulation and perceptions of learning and teaching of preservice teachers. Megamot, 4, 660–685.
Michalsky, T., & Kramarski, B. (in press). Prompting reflections for integrating self-regulation into teacher technology education. Teachers College Record.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2002). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
Niess, M. L. (2008). Guiding Preservice Teachers in TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 223–250). New York: Routledge.
Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299–317.
OECD. (2002). Definition and selection of competencies (DeSeCo): Theoretical and conceptual foundations. (Strategy Paper). Paris: Author.
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings (pp. 3–14). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Schön, D. A. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27, 26–34.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 344–355.
Teo, T., Chai, C. S., Hung, D., & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among preservice teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163–174.
Thompson, A. D., & Mishra, P. (2008). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 2007–2008.
Tillema, H. H. (1995). Changing the professional knowledge and beliefs of teachers: A training study. Learning and Instruction, 5, 291–318.
Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231.
Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
Zhao, Y. (Ed.). (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulated learning: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Zohar, A., & Schwartzer, N. (2005). Assessing teachers’ pedagogical knowledge in the context of teaching higher order thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1595–1620.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix 1: Screen Shot: TPCK-SRL Training Model
The screen-shot presents a comprehension TPCK task. Teachers are asked to CHECK THIS Analyze the task using the IMPROVE prompts. Focus on important events, goals, and processes. Identify difficulties in technology-based teaching/learning while referring to the TPCK transformative approach. Suggest pedagogical approaches that can help you improve the lesson.
Teachers sent responses to the forum and received feedback from peers and provided peers with feedback on their responses to the prompts.
Appendix 2: Teaching and Learning Metaphors
-
A.
Metaphors conceptualizing the “Ideal Teacher”
Here are four metaphors. Each metaphor represents a different teaching process model. Please examine the metaphors and then answer the question below:
In which metaphor do you think the student knows the material best? Explain and justify your choice.
-
B.
Metaphors conceptualizing the “Ideal Student”
Here are four verbal metaphors. Each one represents a different learning process model.
-
1.
The learner is like an empty vessel to be filled.
-
2.
The learner is like a tourist on a guided tour.
-
3.
The learner is like a seedling which has to be nurtured so that it grows and blooms.
-
4.
The learner is like an independent mountain climber.
In which metaphor do you think the student knows the material best? Explain and justify your choice.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kramarski, B., Michalsky, T. (2015). Effect of a TPCK-SRL Model on Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Technology-Based Lesson Design. In: Angeli, C., Valanides, N. (eds) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8080-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8080-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-8079-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-8080-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)