Threshold Concepts: Implications for the Management of Natural Resources

Chapter

Abstract

Threshold concepts can have broad relevance in natural resource management. However, the concept of ecological thresholds has not been widely incorporated or adopted in management goals. This largely stems from the uncertainty revolving around threshold levels and the post hoc analyses that have generally been used to identify them. Natural resource managers have a need for new tools and approaches that will help them assess the existence and detection of conditions that demand management actions. Recognition of additional threshold concepts include: utility thresholds (which are based on human values about ecological systems) and decision thresholds (which reflect management objectives and values and include ecological knowledge about a system) as well as ecological thresholds. All of these concepts provide a framework for considering the use of threshold concepts in natural resource decision making.

Keywords

Natural resource management Non-linear Regime shift Time series 

References

  1. Allen, T. F. H., and T. W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, T., J. Carstensen, E. Hernandez-Garcia, and C. M. Duarte. 2009. Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennetts, R. E., J. E. Gross, K. Cahill, C. McIntyre, B. Bingham, A. Hubbard, L. Cameron, and S. Carter. 2007. Linking monitoring to management and planning: assessment points as a generalized approach. George Wright Forum 64:59–77.Google Scholar
  4. Bestelmeyer, B. T. 2006. Threshold concepts and their use in rangeland management and restoration: The good, the bad, and the insidious. Restoration Ecology 14:325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggs, R., S. R. Carpenter, and W. A. Brock. 2009. Turning back from the brink: Detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:826–831.Google Scholar
  6. Briske, D. D., S. D. Fuhlendorf, and F. E. Smeins. 2006. A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59:225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, S.R. 2003. Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: Pattern and variation. Oldendorf: International Ecology Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, S. R., and W. A. Brock. 2006. Rising variance: A leading indicator of ecological transition. Ecology Letters 9:311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clements, F. E. 1936. Nature and structure of the Climax. Journal of Ecology 24:252–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeAngelis, D. L., and J. C. Waterhouse. 1987. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecological Monographs 57:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ficetola, G. F., and M. Denoel. 2009. Ecological thresholds: An assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species-habitat relationships. Ecography 32:1075–1084. doi:10.1111/j.600-0587.2009.05571.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Folke, C., S. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Elmqvist, et al. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Groffman, P., J. Baron, T. Blett, A. Gold, I. Goodman, L. Gunderson, B. Levinson, M. Palmer, H. Paerl, G. Peterson, N. Poff, D. Rejeski, J. Reynolds, M. Turner, K. Weathers, and J. Wiens. 2006. Ecological thresholds: The key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 8:27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbs, R. J., and K. N. Suding, eds. 2009. New models for ecosystem dynamics and restoration. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  16. Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hollings, C. S., and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10:328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huggett, A. J. 2005. The concept and utility of ‘ecological thresholds’ in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 124:301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knight, R. L., and G. K. Meffe. 1997. Ecosystem management: Agency liberation from command and control. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 676–678.Google Scholar
  20. Link, J. S., J. K. T. Brodziak, S. F. Edwards, W. J. Overholtz, D. Mountain, J. W. Jossi, T. D. Smith, and M. J. Fogarty. 2002. Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:1429–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin, J., M. C. Runge, J. D. Nichols, B. C. Lubow, and W. L. Kendall. 2009. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management. Ecological Applications 19:1079–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, M. G., M. Henrion, and M. Small. 1990. Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pielke, R. A., H. J. Schellnhuber, and D. Sahagian. 2003. Non-linearities in the earth system. Global Change Newsletter 55: 11–15.Google Scholar
  24. Polasky, S., S. R. Carpenter, C. Folke, and B. Keeler. 2011. Decsion-making under great uncertainty: Environmental management in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26: 398–404. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Samhouri, J. F., P. S. Levin, and C. H. Ainsworth. 2010. Identifying thresholds for ecosystem-based management. PLoS One 5: e8907. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.000890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheffer, M., and S. R. Carpenter. 2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: Linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scheffer, M., J. Bascompte, W. A. Brock, V. Brovkin, S. R. Carpenter, V. Dakos, H. Held, E. H. van Nes, M. Rietkerk, and G. Sugihara. 2009. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scheffer, M., S. R. Carpenter, T. M. Lenton, J. Bascompte, W. Brock, V. Dakos, J. van de Koppel, I. A. van de Leemput, S. A. Levin, E. H. van Nes, M. Pascual, and J. Vandermeer. 2012. Anticipating critical transitions. Science 338: 344–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stenseth, N. C., K. S. Chan, H. Tong, R. Boonstra, S. Boutin, C. J. Krebs, E. Post, M. O’Donoghue, N. G. Yoccoz, M. C. Forchhammer, and J. Hurrell. 1999. Common dynamic structure of Canada Lynx populations within three climatic regions. Science 285:1071–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suding, K. N., and R. J. Hobbs. 2009. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: A developing framework. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suter, G. W. 2007. Ecological Risk assessment. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tallis, H., P. S. Levin, M. Ruckelshaus, S. E. Lester, K. L. McLeod, D. L. Fluharty, and B. S. Halpern. 2010. The many faces of ecosystem-based management: Making the process work today in real places. Marine Policy 34:340–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurelUSA
  2. 2.Inventory and Monitoring ProgramU.S. National Park ServiceFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations