Grafting and Crafting New Zealand’s Mental Health Policy

Chapter
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP)

Abstract

The legal and institutional foundations of the New zealand system were laid by Pakeha (European) settlers with scant regard for Maori insights on mental illness. The colonial system was eclectically British. Colonial conditions favoured direct state management. Bureaucratic continuity prevailed with inquiries held only when publicity exposed unacceptable conditions. There were positive initiatives within the institutional environment. Nevertheless, vested bureaucratic and industrial interests upheld a system insulated from mainstream health services. Those features were largely unchallenged until the notion of integration appealed to hard-pressed ministers to explain systemic deficiencies. Leading officials reluctantly followed suit. In the period after World War Two, the therapeutic revolution, prosperity, growing social acceptance, voluntary organizations and international trends were transforming the character of mental hospitals. Perhaps the greatest example of departmental leadership was a moratorium on further institutional accommodation in 1973. This foreshadowed the last phase of deinstitutionalization. Hospital closures were largely driven locally by a mix of ideology and economy. Nevertheless, the lamentable saga begot a new, post-institutional, policy framework. Moreover, the process has spawned a very diverse policy community. Advocacy groups, voluntary service providers, mental health consumers, Maori organizations, along with longstanding interest groups of professionals and service providers, have all found an effective voice. A great deal was achieved by a synergistic partnership between the Ministry and an independent Mental Health Commission (MHC). Successful change in policy and services needs a sustained, incremental approach under stable organizational conditions. Ring-fenced funding and wise stewardship must protect new initiatives. Widespread political, community, sectoral and intersectoral support is vital. Effective implementation needs detailed planning statements of resource costs and organizational responsibilities. Outcomes should be owned by service users, families and carers.

Keywords

British colonial system Vested interests Isolated from mainstream health services Diverse, contemporary, policy community Need ring-fenced funding and wise leadership for reform 

References

  1. AJHR H-13 [Appendices to the journals of the House of Representatives]. (1881). Lunatic asylums of New Zealand (annual report on). Government Printer: Wellington.Google Scholar
  2. AJHR H-31. (1950, 1961). Annual report of the Director-General of Health. Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  3. Armour, P. K. (1981). The cycles of social reform. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, P., & Newberry, S. (2002). Reshaping community mental health services in a restructured state: New Zealand 1984–97. Public Management Review, 4(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunton, W. A. (1985). Mental health law in New Zealand: Some sources and traditions. Community Mental Health in New Zealand, 2(1), 70–83.Google Scholar
  6. Brunton, W. A. (1986). Mental health and the second public health revolution: Are there any lessons from the first revolution? In M. Abbott & D. Braun (Eds.), The future of mental health promotion in New Zealand: Prevention and mental health promotion (pp. 33–39). Auckland: Mental Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Brunton, W. A. (2003). The origins of deinstitutionalisation in New Zealand. Health and History, 5(2), 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunton, W. A. (2004). Out of the shadows: Some historical underpinnings of mental health policy. In B. Dalley & M. Tennant (Eds.), Past judgement (pp. 75–90). Dunedin: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brunton, W. A. (2005). The place of public inquiries in shaping New Zealand’s national mental health policy, 1858–1996. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2(24). doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-2-24
  10. Brunton, W. A. (2011). The Scottish impact on psychiatry in New Zealand before World War II. Immigrants and Minorities, 29(3), 308–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunton, W. A. (2015). ‘At variance with the most elementary principles’: The state of British colonial lunatic asylums in 1863. History of Psychiatry, 26(2), 147–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Buck, P. H. (1910). Medicine amongst the Maoris in ancient and modern times. Unpublished M.D. Thesis. University of New Zealand.Google Scholar
  13. Busfield, J. (1986). Managing madness. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, P. S. (1996). The early history of the New Zealand Association of Psychotherapists and the related movement for primary prevention in mental health: Some recollections. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 30(3), 405–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Department of Health. (1947). Circular Memorandum, August 15, 1947, HMH 25/21.Google Scholar
  16. Department of Health. (1967). Organisation and methods report on mental health division patients affairs. Unpublished report formerly held in Health Department records storage but current whereabouts unknown.Google Scholar
  17. Department of Health. (1969). A review of hospital and related services. Wellington: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  18. Department of Health. (1974). Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals. Wellington: Department of Health Special Report No. 47.Google Scholar
  19. Durie, M. (2011). Indigenizing mental health services: New Zealand experience. Transcultural Psychiatry, 48(1–2), 24–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frame, J. (1961). Faces in the water. Christchurch: Pegasus Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gluckman, L. K. (1976). A medical history of nineteenth century New Zealand prior to 1860. Auckland: The author.Google Scholar
  22. Henriques, U. (1974). Jeremy Bentham and the machinery of social reform. In H. Hearder & H. R. Loyn (Eds.), British government and administration (pp. 169–186). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kearns, R. A., & Joseph, A. E. (2000). Contracting opportunities: Interpreting post-asylum geographies of mental health care in Auckland, New Zealand. Health and Place, 6(3), 159–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kearns, R. A., Joseph, A. E., & Moon, G. (2009). Recycling former psychiatric hospitals in New Zealand: Echoes of deinstitutionalisation and restructuring. Health and Place, 15(6), 79–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindsay, W. L. (1872). Colonial lunacy boards; with special reference to New Zealand. Edinburgh Medical Journal, 17, 807–829, 909–928.Google Scholar
  26. MaGPIe Research Group. (2003). The nature and prevalence of psychological problems in New Zealand primary health care: A report on the mental health and general practice investigation (MaGPIe). New Zealand Medical Journal 116(1171), U379 (Online).Google Scholar
  27. Mason, K. H. [Chair]. (1988). Report of the committee of inquiry into procedures used in certain psychiatric hospitals in relation to admission, discharge or release on leave of certain classes of patients. Wellington: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  28. Mason, K. [Chair]. (1996). Report of the ministerial inquiry [in respect of certain mental health services] to the Minister of Health Hon Jenny Shipley. Wellington: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  29. McGeorge, P. (2012). Lessons learned in developing community mental health care in Australasia and the South Pacific. World Psychiatry, 11(2), 129–132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Mental Health Commission. (2006). Report on progress towards implementing the blueprint for mental health services in New Zealand. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.Google Scholar
  31. Mental Health Commission. (2007). Te haererenga mo te whakaoranga/The journey of recovery for the New Zealand mental health sector. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.Google Scholar
  32. Ministry of Health. (1994). Looking forward. Wellington: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  33. Ministry of Health. (2012). Rising to the challenge. Wellington: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  34. Parsons, G. A. (2012). The construction of shell shock in New Zealand, 1919–1939: A reassessment. Social History of Medicine, 26(1), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Platform Trust. (2013). NGO stories & statistics. Wellington: Platform Trust.Google Scholar
  36. Pomare, E. W., & de Boer, G. M. (1984). Hauora. Wellington: Department of Health, Special Report No. 78.Google Scholar
  37. Prebble, K., & Bryder, L. (2008). Gender and class tensions between psychiatric nurses and the general nursing profession in mid-twentieth century New Zealand. Nursing Profession, 30(2), 181–195.Google Scholar
  38. Rodenburg, H., & Dowell, A. (2008). Developments in primary mental health family care in New Zealand. Mental Health Family Medicine, 5(4), 247–249.Google Scholar
  39. Southern Mercury. (1877, April 14). [Dunedin].Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, J. (2000). Mental health services in New Zealand. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23(3–4), 215–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryNotre Dame UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations