Skip to main content

Source Factors in Recommender System Credibility Evaluation

  • Chapter
Recommender Systems Handbook

Abstract

Although recommender system research in the last decade has provided significant insight into how users interact with and evaluate systems, the social role of recommender systems as advice givers has been largely neglected. By conceptualizing the advice seeking and giving relationship as a fundamentally social process, important avenues for understanding the persuasiveness of recommender systems open up. Specifically, research regarding the influence of source characteristics, which is abundant in the context of human-human communication, can provide an important framework for identifying potential influence factors. This chapter reviews the existing literature on source factors in the context of human-human, human-technology, and human-recommender system interactions. It also discusses system credibility evaluation in light of the increasing popularity of social technology. It concludes that many social cues that have been identified as influential in other contexts have yet to be implemented and tested with respect to recommender systems. Implications for recommender system research and design are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Addington, D.: The effect of vocal variations on ratings of source credibility. Speech Monographs 38, 242–247 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aksoy, L., Bloom, P.N., Lurie, N.H., Cooil, B.: Should recommendation agents think like people? Journal of Service Research 8(4), 297–315 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Natour, S., Benbasat, I., Cenfetelli, R.T.: The role of design characteristics in shaping perceptions of similarity: The case of online shopping assistants. Journal of Association for Information Systems 7(12), 821–861 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen, K.E., Clevenger T., J.: A summary of experimental research in ethos. Speech Monographs 30, 59–78 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ansari, A., Essegaier, S., Kohli, R.: Internet recommendation systems. Journal of Marketing Research 37(3), 363–375 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Armentano, M.G., Godoy, D., Amandi, A.: Topology-based recommendation of users in micro-blogging communities. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 27(3), 624–634 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson, D.R., Winzelberg, A., Holland, A.: Ethnicity, locus of control for family planning, and pregnancy counselor credibility. Journal of Counseling Psychology 32, 417–421 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., Urban, G.L.: Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers?: A large scale exploratory and empirical study. Journal of Marketing 69(4), 133–152 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barwise, P., Elberse, A., Hammond, K.: Marketing and the internet: A research review. In: B. Weitz, R. Wensley (eds.) Handbook of Marketing, pp. 3–7. Russell Sage, New York, NY (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Basartan, Y.: Amazon versus the shopbot: An experiment about how to improve the shopbots. Tech. rep., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2001). Ph.D. Summer Paper

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bechwati, N.N., Xia, L.: Do computers sweat? the impact of perceived effort of online decision aids on consumers’ satisfaction with the decision process. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(1–2), 139–148 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bharti, P., Chaudhury, A.: An empirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems. Decision Support Systems 37(2), 187–197 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bickman, L.: The social power of a uniform. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4, 47–61 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., Wright, P. (eds.): Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 3. Kluwer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A.R., Elliott, S.M.: Effects of humorous illustrations in college textbooks. Human Communication Research 8, 43–57 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory 6, 203–242 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burgoon, J.K., Birk, T., Pfau, M.: Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Human Communication Research 17, 140–169 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burgoon, J.K., Dunbar, N.E., Segring, C.: Nonverbal influence. In: J.P. Dillard, M. Pfau (eds.) Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, pp. 445–473. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burke, R.: Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4), 331–370 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Burke, R., Hammond, K., Young, B.: The findme approach to assisted browsing. IEEE Expert 4(12), 32–40 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Byrne, D.: The attraction paradigm. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Byrne, D., Rhamey, R.: Magnitude of positive and negative reinforcements as a determinant of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2, 884–889 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carli, L.L., Ganley, R., Pierce-Otay, A.: Similarity and satisfaction in roommate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17(4), 419–426 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang, K.J., Gruner, C.R.: Audience reaction to self-disparaging humor. Southern Speech Communication Journal 46, 419–426 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cialdini, R.B.: Interpersonal influence. In: S. Shavitt, T.C. Brock (eds.) Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspective, pp. 195–217. Allyn and Bacon, Needhan Heights, Massachusetts (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cooke, A.D.J., Sujan, H., Sujan, M., Weitz, B.A.: Marketing the unfamiliar: The role of context and item-specific information in electronic agent recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research 39(4), 488–497 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cooper, J., Bennett, E.A., Sukel, H.L.: Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? Law and Human Behavior 20 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cosley, D., Lam, S.K., Albert, I., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Is seeing believing? how recommender systems influence users’ opinions. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI: Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 585–592 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cowell, A.J., Stanney, K.M.: Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, 281–306 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Delgado-Ballester, E.: Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories: A multigroup invariance analysis. European Journal of Marketing 38(5–6), 573–592 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Delia, J.G.: Regional dialect, message acceptance, and perceptions of the speaker. Central States Speech Journal 26, 188–194 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dijkstra, J.J., Liebrand, W.B.G., Timminga, E.: Persuasiveness of expert systems. Behaviour & Information Technology 17(3), 155–163 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eagly, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., Longo, L.C.: What is beautiful is good, but …: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110, 109–128 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S.: An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(1), 136–144 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eagly, A.H., Wood, W., Chaiken, S.: Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 424–435 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Engstrom, E.: Effects of nonfluencies on speakers’ credibility in newscast settings. Perceptual and Motor Skills 78, 739–743 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fasolo, B., McClelland, G.H., Lange, K.A.: The effect of site design and interattribute correlations on interactive web-based decisions. In: C.P. Haughvedt, K. Machleit, R. Yalch (eds.) Online Consumer Psychology: Understanding and Influencing Behavior in the Virtual World, pp. 325–344. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Felix, D., Niederberger, C., Steiger, P., Stolze, M.: Feature-oriented versus needs-oriented product access for non-expert online shoppers. In: B. Schmid, K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, V. Tschammer-Zurich (eds.) Towards the E-Society: E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government, pp. 399–406. Springer, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J.:Perceptions of Internet Information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515–540 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society 9, 319–342 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fleshler, H., Ilardo, J., Demoretcky, J.: The influence of field dependence, speaker credibility set, and message documentation on evaluations of speaker and message credibility. Southern Speech Communication Journal 39, 389–402 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fogg, B.J., Lee, E., Marshall, J.: Interactive technology and persuasion: Developments in theory and practice. In: P. Dillard, M. Pfau (eds.) Persuasion handbook, pp. 765–797. Sage, London, United Kingdom (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fogg, B.J., Nass, C.: Silicon sycophants: Effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46(5), 551–561 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Friedrich, G., Zanker, M.: A taxonomy for generating explanations in recommender systems. AI Magazine 32(3), 90–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gatignon, H., Robertson, T.S.: Innovative Decision Processes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Giffen, K., Ehrlich, L.: Attitudinal effects of a group discussion on a proposed change in company policy. Speech Monographs 30, 377–379 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Giles, H., Coupland, N.: Language: Contexts and Consequences. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gilly, M.C., Graham, J.L., Wolfinbarger, M.F., Yale, L.J.: A dyadic study of personal information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26(2), 83–100 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Grasch, P., Felfernig, A., Reinfrank, F.: Recomment: Towards critiquing-based recommendation with speech interaction. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), pp. 157–164 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gretzel, U., Fesenmaier, D.R.: Persuasion in recommender systems. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11(2), 81–100 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gruner, C.R., Lampton, W.E.: Effects of including humorous material in a persuasive sermon. Southern Speech Communication Journal 38, 188–196 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gundersen, D.F., Hopper, R.: Relationships between speech delivery and speech effectiveness. Communication Monographs 43, 158–165 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Guy, I., Carmel, D.: Social recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the World-Wide-Web Conference (WWW), pp. 283–284 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Guy, I., Zwerdling, N., Ronen, I., Carmel, D., Uziel, E.: Social media recommendation based on people and tags. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 194–201 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Harkins, S.G., Petty, R.E.: The multiple source effect in persuasion: The effects of distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4, 627–635 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Harkins, S.G., Petty, R.E.: Information utility and the multiple source effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 260–268 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Harmon, R.R., Coney, K.A.: The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. Journal of Marketing Research 19(2), 255–260 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Häubl, G., Murray, K.: Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: The role of electronic recommendation agents. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(1–2), 75–91 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 241–250. Philadelphia, PA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hess, T., J. Fuller, M.A., Mathew, J.: Involvement and decision-making performance with a decision aid: The influence of social multimedia, gender, and playfulness. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(3), 15–54 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hewgill, M.A., Miller, G.R.: Source credibility and response to fear-arousing communications. Speech Monographs 32, 95–101 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hofling, C.K., Brotzman, E., Dalrymple, S., Graves, N., Pierce, C.M.: An experimental study of nurse-physician relationships. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 143, 171–180 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hogg, M.A., CooperShaw, L., Holzworth, D.W.: Group prototypically and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19(4), 452–465 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., Neumann, M.M.: The influence of avatars on online cosumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing 70, 19–36 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Horai, J., Naccari, N., Fatoullah, E.: The effects of expertise and physical attractiveness upon opinion agreement and liking. Sociometry 37, 601–606 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Jackson, J.M.: Theories of group behavior, chap. Social impact theory: A social forces model of influence, pp. 111–124. Springer, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Ge, M., Groening, M.: Recommender systems in computer science and information systems - a landscape of research. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web), pp. 76–87 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jiang, J.J., Klein, G., Vedder, R.G.: Persuasive expert systems: The influence of confidence and discrepancy. Computers in Human Behavior 16, 99–109 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Jiang, Z., Benbasat, I.: Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(3), 111–148 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Khooshabeh, J., McCall, P., Gratch, C., Blascovich, J., Gandhe, S.: Does it mater if a computer jokes? In: Proceedings of ACM CHI: Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 77–86. Vancouver, Canada (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Waters, K.: A prisoner’s dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(1), 47–65 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kim, B.D., Kim, S.O.: A new recommender system to combine content-based and collaborative filtering systems. Journal of Database Marketing 8(3), 244–252 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Koda, T.: Agents with faces: A study on the effects of personification of software agents. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Komiak, S.X., Benbasat, I.: Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce and traditional commerce. Information Technology and Management 5(1–2), 181–207 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Komiak, S.Y.X., Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Trust building in virtual salespersons versus in human salespersons: Similarities and differences. e-Service Journal 3(3), 49–63 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, chap. Collaborative Filtering: Supporting Social Navigation in Large, Crowded Infospaces, pp. 43–82. Springer, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lascu, D.N., Bearden, W.O., Rose, R.L.: Norm extremity and personal influence on consumer conformity. Journal of Business Research 32, 201–213 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Latané, B.: The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36, 343–356 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Lautman, M.R., Dean, K.J.: Time compression of television advertising. In: L. Percy, A.G. Woodside (eds.) Advertising and consumer psychology, pp. 219–236. Lexington Books, Lexington, Ma (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Lazarsfeld, P., Merton., R.K.: Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In: M. Berger, T. Abel, C.H. Page (eds.) Freedom and Control in Modern Society, pp. 18–66. Van Nostrand, New York (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Levine, R.V.: Whom do we trust? experts, honesty, and likability. In: R.V. Levine (ed.) The Power of Persuasion, pp. 29–63. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  83. MacLachlan, J.: Listener perception of time-compressed spokespersons. Journal of Advertising Research 22(2), 47–51 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Maes, P., Guttman, R.H., Moukas, A.G.: Agents that buy and sell. Communications of the ACM 42(3), 81–91 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709–734 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Mayer, R.E., Johnson, W.L., Shaw, E., Sandhu, S.: Constructing computer-based tutors that are socially sensitive: Politeness in educational software. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(1), 36–42 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. McCroskey, J.C.: The effects of evidence as an inhibitor of counter-persuasion. Speech Monographs 37, 188–194 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. McCroskey, J.C., Mehrley, R.S.: The effects of disorganization and nonfluency on attitude change and source credibility. Speech Monographs 36, 13–21 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. McGinty, L., B., S.: Deep dialogue vs casual conversation in recommender systems. In: F. Ricci, B. Smyth (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Personalization in eCommerce at the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Web-Based Systems (AH), pp. 80–89. Springer, Universidad de Malaga, Malaga, Spain (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  90. McGuire, W.J.: The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In: G. Lindzey, E. Aronson (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  91. McNee, S.M., Lam, S.K., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Interfaces for eliciting new user preferences in recommender systems. In: User Modeling, LNCS 2702, pp. 178–187. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J., Medders, R.B.: Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication 60, 413–439 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Mills, J., Kimble, C.E.: Opinion change as a function of perceived similarity of the communicator and subjectivity of the issue. Bulletin of the psychonomic society 2, 35–36 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Mohr, L.A., Bitner, M.J.: The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions. Journal of Business Research 32(3), 239–252 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Moon, Y.: Personalization and personality: Some effects of customizing message style based on consumer personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12(4), 313–326 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Moon, Y., Nass, C.: How “real” are computer personalities? psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research 23(6), 651–674 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H.A., Lester, J.C.: The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction 19(2), 177–213 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Morkes, J., Kernal, H.K., Nass, C.: Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of srct theory. Human-Computer Interaction 14(4), 395–435 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Moundridou, M., Virvou, M.: Evaluation the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18(3), 253–261 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Munn, W.C., Gruner, C.R.: “sick” jokes, speaker sex, and informative speech. Southern Speech Communication Journal 46, 411–418 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Murano, P.: Anthropomorphic vs. non-anthropomorphic software interface feedback for online factual delivery. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Visualization (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  102. Nass, C., Brave, S.: Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., Moon, Y.: Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45(6), 669–678 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Nass, C., Isbister, K., Lee, E.J.: Truth is beauty: Researching embodied conversational agents. In: J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, E. Churchill (eds.) Embodied conversational agents, pp. 374–402. MIT Pres, Cambridge, MA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56(1), 81–103 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Carney, P.: Are respondents polite to computers? social desirability and direct responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(5), 1093–1110 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Green, N.: Are computers gender-neutral? gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27(10), 864–876 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Nguyen, H., Masthoff, J., P., E.: Persuasive effects of embodied conversational agent teams. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 176–185. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Beijing, China (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Nowak, K.: The influence of anthropomorphism and agency on social judgment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Nowak, K., Rauh, C.: The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  111. Nowak, K.L., Biocca, F.: The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on user’s sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleperators and Virtual Environments 12(5), 481–494 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. O’Keefe, D.J.: Justification explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying support articulation in persuasive messages. Argumentation and advocacy 35, 61–75 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  113. O’Keefe, D.J.: Persuasion: Theory & Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  114. P., B., A., S.M.: I thought it was terrible and everyone else loved it - a new perspective for effective recommender system design. In: Proceedings of the 19th British HCI Group Annual Conference, pp. 251–261. Napier University, Edinburgh, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  115. Parise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Waters, K.: Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior 15, 123–142 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Pazzani, M.: A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artificial Intelligence Review 13, 393–408 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Pereira, R.E.: Optimizing human-computer interaction for the electronic commerce environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 1(1), 23–44 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  118. Perloff, R.M.: The Dynamics of Persuasion, 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  119. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic And Contemporary Approaches. William C. Brown, Dubuque, IA (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  120. Pittam, J.: Voice in Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  121. Pu, P., Chen, L.: Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 20, 542–556 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  122. Qiu, L.: Designing social interaction with animated avatars and speech output for product recommendation agents in electronic commerce. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  123. Quintanar, L.R., Crowell, C.R., Pryor, J.B., Adamopoulos, J.: Human-computer interaction: A preliminary social psychological analysis. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 14(2), 210–220 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. CSLI, New York, NY (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  125. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175–186 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  126. Rhoads, K.V., Cialdini, R.B.: The business of influence. In: J.P. Dillard, M. Pfau (eds.) Persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, pp. 513–542. Sage, London, United Kingdom (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  127. Rosen, D.J.: Driver education for the information super-highway: How adult learners and practitioners use the internet. Literacy Leader Fellowship Program Reports 2(2) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  128. Sampson, E.E., Insko, C.A.: Cognitive consistency and performance in the autokinetic situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68, 184–192 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Schafer, J.B.: Dynamiclens: A dynamic user-interface for a meta-recommendation system. In: Proceedings of the Workshop: Beyond Personalization at IUI’05. San Diego, CA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  130. Schafer, J.B., Frankowski, D., Herlocker, J., Sen, S.: Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: The Adaptive Web, LNCS 4321, pp. 291–324 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  131. Schafer, J.B., Knostan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Meta-recommendation systems: User-controlled integration of diverse recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 11th international Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. McLean, VA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  132. Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: View through metalens: Usage patterns for a meta-recommendation system. IEE Proceedings-Software 151 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  133. Schliesser, H.F.: Information transmission and ethos of a speaker using normal and defective speech. Central States Speech Journal 19, 169–174 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Scholz-Crane, A.: Evaluating the future: A preliminary study of the process of how undergraduate students evaluate Web sources, Reference Services Review 26(3–4): 53–60, (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Self, C.S.: Credibility. In: D.W. Stacks, M.B. Salwen (eds.) An integrated approach to communication theory and research, pp. 421–441. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  136. Sénécal, S., Nantel, J.: Online influence of relevant others: A framework. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce Research (ICECR-6). Dallas, Texas (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  137. Sénécal, S., Nantel, J.: The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing 80(2), 159–169 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Shani, G., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Hadash, S., Tangi, M.: Investigating confidence displays for top-n recommendations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(12), 2548–2563 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Shavitt, S., Brock, T.C.: Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  140. Shimazu, H.: Expertclerk: A conversational case-based reasoning tool for salesclerk agents in e-commerce webshops. Artificial Intelligence Review 18(3–4), 223–244 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Sinha, R., Swearingen, K.: Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. In: Proceedings of the 2nd DELOS Network of Excellence Workshop on Personalization and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries, pp. 18–20. Dublin, Ireland (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  142. Smith, A.G.: Testing the surf: Criteria for evaluation internet information resources. Public-Access Computer System Review 8(3), 5–23 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  143. Smith, R.E., Hunt, S.D.: Attributional processers and effects in promotional situations. Journal of Consumer Research 5, 149–158 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Snyder, M., Rothbart, M.: Communicator attractiveness and opinion change. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 3, 377–387 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J.H., Waters, K.: When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction 11(1), 97–124 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Sutcliffe, A.G., Ennis, M., Hu, J.: Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53, 741–763 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  147. Swartz, T.A.: Relationship between source expertise and source similarity in an advertising context. Journal of Advertising 13(2), 49–55 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  148. Swearingen, K., Sinha, R.: Beyond algorithms:an hci perspective on recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Workshop on Recommender Systems. New Orleans, Louisiana (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  149. Tamborini, R., Zillmann, D.: College students’ perceptions of lecturers using humor. Perceptual and Motor Skills 52, 427–432 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Taylor, P.M.: An experimental study of humor and ethos. Southern Speech Communication Journal 39, 359–366 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Effective explanations of recommendations: User-centered design. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), pp. 153–156. Minneapolis, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  152. Tzeng, J.Y.: Toward a more civilized design: Studying the effects of computers that apologize. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(3), 319–345 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Wang, W.: Design of trustworthy online recommendation agents: Explanation facilities and decision strategy support. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  154. Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6(3), 72–101 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  155. Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(4), 217–246 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Wang, Y.D., Emurian, H.H.: An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements and implications. Computers in Human Behavior 21(1), 105–125 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. West, P.M., Ariely, D., Bellman, S., Bradlow, E., Huber, J., Johnson, E., Kahn, B., Little, J., Schkade, D.: Agents to the rescue? Marketing Letters 10(3), 285–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Wolf, S., Bugaj, A.M.: The social impact of courtroom witnesses. Social Behaviour 5(1), 1–13 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  159. Xiao, B., Benbasat, I.: E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly 31(1), 137–209 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  160. Xiao, B., Benbasat, I.: Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management, chap. Research on the Use, Characteristics, and Impact of e-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: A Review and Update for 2007–2012, pp. 403–431. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  161. Yoo, K.H.: Creating more credible and likable recommender systems. Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  162. Yoo, K.H., Gretzel, U.: The influence of perceived credibility on preferences for recommender systems as sources of advice. Information Technology & Tourism 10(2), 133–146 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Yoo, K.H., Gretzel, U.: The influence of virtual representatives on recommender system evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems. San Francisco, California (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  164. Yoon, S.N., Lee, Z.: The impact of the web-based product recommendation systems from previous buyers on consumers’ purchasing behavior. In: 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems. New York, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  165. Zanker, M., Bricman, M., Gordea, S., Jannach, D., Jessenitschnig, M.: Persuasive online-selling in quality and taste domains. In: E-Commerce and Web Technologies, pp. 51–60. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  166. Zanker, M., Jessenitschnig, M.: Case-studies on exploiting explicit customer requirements in recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19(1–2), 133–166 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Zhou, X., Xu, Y., Li, Y., Josang, A., Cox, C.: The state-of-the-art in personalized recommender systems for social networking. Artificial Intelligence Review 37, 119–132 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Hyan Yoo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yoo, KH., Gretzel, U., Zanker, M. (2015). Source Factors in Recommender System Credibility Evaluation. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds) Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7636-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7637-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics