Relationship Between Structure and Mechanics for Membranous Tissues

  • Jessica W. Y. Jor
  • Thiranja P. Babarenda Gamage
  • Poul M. F. Nielsen
  • Martyn P. Nash
  • Peter J. Hunter

Abstract

Professor Yoram Lanir has pioneered the development of structurally based constitutive relations to describe the stressstrain response of soft biological tissues. This approach relates the mechanical response of the tissue to the intrinsic micro-structural properties of its constituents, such as collagen. This article summarises some of the work by the Auckland Bioengineering Institute contributing towards the goal of understanding the structure–function relationship of soft membranous tissue. Key aspects of our work are to (1) develop constitutive relations based on quantitative information of tissue structure; and (2) use rich sets of experimental data to aid in accurate and reliable constitutive parameter identification. We first outline several common techniques to quantify tissue structure, such as collagen fibre orientations. A detailed description of an extended-volume imaging system, developed in our laboratory, is then provided along with a few application examples. The gathered imaging data is incorporated into structural constitutive models by means of fitting to mathematical distributions. Based upon the observations made from some imaging studies, a conceptual fibre distribution model is proposed for modelling the collagen network in skin. We then introduce a selection of constitutive models, which have been developed to characterise the mechanical behaviour of soft connective tissues (skin in particular), with particular emphasis on structurally based models. Finite element models, used with appropriate constitutive relations, provide a means of interpreting experimental results. Some of our recent efforts in developing instrumentation to measure the two-dimensional and three-dimensional response of soft tissues are described. This includes a biaxial tensile rig, which is capable of deforming membranes in up to 16 directions, and a force-sensitive micro-robot. We highlight some of the challenges often associated with constitutive parameter identification using commonly used model based fitting approaches. These issues were examined and illustrated in depth by performing controlled studies on silicon gel phantoms, which allowed us to focus our attention solely on the identification problem. Lastly, future directions of applying structurally based models to understanding the biomechanics of soft tissues are discussed.

Keywords

Anisotropy Graphite Agar Helium Convolution 

References

  1. Abrahams M. Mechanical behaviour of tendon in vitro. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1967;5:433–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvares D. A 3D strain measurement system for soft materials: application to material parameter estimation. Master’s Thesis, The University of Auckland; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Arbogast KB, Thibault KL, Scott Pinheiro B, Winey KI, Margulies SS. A high-frequency shear device for testing soft biological tissues. J Biomech. 1997;30(7):757–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babarenda Gamage TP, Rajagopal V, Ehrgott M, Nash MP, Nielsen PMF. Identification of mechanical properties of heterogeneous soft bodies using gravity loading. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 2011;27(3):391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billiar K, Sacks M. A method to quantify the fiber kinematics of planar tissues under biaxial stretch. J Biomech. 1997;30(7):753–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billiar K, Sacks M. Biaxial mechanical properties of the native and glutarldehyde-treated aortic valve cusp: part II - a structural constitutive model. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122:327–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown IA. A scanning electron microscope study of the effects of uniaxial tension on human skin. Br J Dermatol. 1973;89(4):383–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carton RW, Dainauskas J, Clark JW. Elastic properties of single elastic fibers. J Appl Physiol. 1962;17(3):547–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi HS, Vito RP. Two-dimensional stress-strain relationship for canine pericardium. J Biomech Eng. 1990;112(2):153–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox H. The cleavage lines of the skin. Br J Surg. 1941;29(114):234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craik JE, McNeil IRR. Histological studies of stressed skin. In: Biomechanics and related bioengineering topics. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1964. p. 159–64.Google Scholar
  12. Daly C. The biomechanical characteristics of human skin. Ph.D. Thesis. Scotland: University of Strathclyde; 1966.Google Scholar
  13. Daly CH. The role of elastin in the mechanical behavior of human skin. In: 8th International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering; 1969.Google Scholar
  14. Dokos S, LeGrice IJ, Smaill BH, Kar J, Young AA. A triaxial-measurement shear-test device for soft biological tissues. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122(5):471–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolber P, Spach M. Conventional and confocal fluorescence microscopy of collagen fibers in the heart. J Histochem Cytochem. 1993;41(3):465–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckert C, Mikulis B, Gottlieb D, Gerneke D, LeGrice I, Padera R, Mayer J, Schoen F, Sacks M. Three-dimensional quantitative micromorphology of pre- and post-implanted engineered heart valve tissues. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:205–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans S, Holt C. Measuring the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo using digital image correlation and finite element modelling. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2009;44:337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finlay B. Scanning electron microscopy of the human dermis under uni-axial strain. Biomed Eng. 1969;4(7):322–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Flynn C, Taberner A, Nielsen P. Measurement of the force-displacement response of in vivo human skin under a rich set of deformations. Med Eng Phys. 2011a;33(5):610–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flynn C, Taberner A, Nielsen P. Modeling the mechanical response of human skin under a rich set of deformations. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011b;39:1935–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freed AD, Einstein DR, Vesely I. Invariant formulation for dispersed transverse isotropy in aortic heart valves: an efficient means for modeling fiber splay. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2005;4(2–3):100–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fung Y. Foundations of solid mechanics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1965.Google Scholar
  23. Fung YC. Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. Am J Physiol. 1967;213(6):1532–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface. 2006;3(6):15–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harkness ML, Harkness RD. Effect of enzymes on mechanical properties of tissues. Nature. 1959;183:1821–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holzapfel G, Ogden R. On planar biaxial tests for anisotropic nonlinearly elastic solids. a continuum mechanical framework. Math Mech Solids. 2009;14:474–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holzapfel G, Gasser T, Stadler M. A structural model for the viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls: continuum formulation and finite element analysis. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2002;21:441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horowitz A, Lanir Y, Yin FCP, Perl M, Sheinman I, Strumpf RK. Structural three dimensional constitutive law for the passive myocardium. J Biomech Eng. 1988;110:200–07.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Humphrey J. Review paper: continuum biomechanics of soft biological tissues. Proc R Soc Lond A Math. 2003;459(2029):3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FCP. Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: I. A new functional form. J Biomech Eng. 1990;112(3):333–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Humphrey J, Kang T, Sakarda P, Anjanappa M. Computer-aided vascular experimentation: a new electromechanical test system. Ann Biomed Eng. 1993;21:33–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hurschler C, Loitz-Ramage B, Vanderby R. A structurally based stress-stretch relationship for tendon and ligament. J Biomech Eng. 1997;119(4):392–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jahne B. Practical handbook on image processing for scientific and technical applications, chap 13. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004. p. 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jor J, Nash M, Nielsen P, Hunter P. Estimating material parameters of a structurally based constitutive relation for skin mechanics. Biomech Model Mechanbiol. 2011a;10:767–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jor JWY, Nielsen PMF, Nash MP, Hunter PJ. Modelling collagen fibre orientation in porcine skin based upon confocal laser scanning microscopy. Skin Res Tech. 2011b;17(2):149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Junquiera LC, Montes GS, Sanchez EM. The influence of tissue section thickness on the study of collagen by the picrosirius-polarization method. Histochemistry. 1982;74:153–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kenedi R, Gibson T, Daly C. Bio-engineering studies of the human skin: the effects of unidirectional tension. In: Structure and function of connective and skeletal tissue. London: Butterworths; 1965. p. 388–95.Google Scholar
  38. Kvistedal YA, Nielsen PMF. Estimating material parameters of human skin in vivo. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2009;8(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lanir Y. A structural theory for the homogeneous biaxial stress-strain relationships in flat collagenous tissues. J Biomech. 1979;12(6):423–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lanir Y. Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J Biomech. 1983;16(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lanir Y, Fung YC. Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. I. Experimental system. J Biomech. 1974a;7(1):29–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lanir Y, Fung YC. Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. II. Experimental results. J Biomech. 1974b;7(2):171–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lanir Y, Lichtenstein O, Imanuel O. Optimal design of biaxial tests for structural material characterization of flat tissues. J Biomech Eng. 1996;118:41–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lokshin O, Lanir Y. Micro and macro rheology of planar tissues. Biomaterials. 2009a;30:3118–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lokshin O, Lanir Y. Viscoelasticity and preconditioning of rat skin under uniaxial stretch: microstructural constitutive characterization. J Biomech Eng. 2009b;131(3):031009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacKenna DA, Omens JH, Covell JW. Left ventricular perimysial collagen fibers uncoil rather than stretch during diastolic filling. Basic Res Cardiol. 1996;91(2):111–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Malcolm D. Estimating the material properties of inhomogeneous elastic membranes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland; 2000.Google Scholar
  48. Malcolm DTK, Nielsen PMF, Hunter PJ, Charette PG. Strain measurement in biaxially loaded inhomogeneous, anisotropic elastic membranes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2002;1: 197–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manschot JFM. The mechanical properties of human skin In Vivo. Ph.D. Thesis. The Netherlands: Nijmegen University; 1985.Google Scholar
  50. Manschot JF, Brakkee AJ. The measurement and modelling of the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo–I. The measurement. J Biomech. 1986;19(7):511–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marcarian HQ, Calhoun ML. Microscopic anatomy of the integument of adult swine. Am J Vet Res. 1966;27(118):765–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Meijer R. Characterisation of anisotropic and non-linear behaviour of human skin. Technical Report, Personal Care Institute of Philips Research Laboratories; 1997.Google Scholar
  53. Melis P, Noorlander ML, van der Horst CMA, van Noorden CJF. Rapid alignment of collagen fibers in the dermis of undermined and not undermined skin stretched with a skin-stretching device. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(2):674–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meyer W, Neurand K, Radke B. Collagen fibre arrangement in the skin of the pig. J Anat. 1982;134:139–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Mowafy M, Cassens RG. Microscopic structure of pig skin. J Anim Sci. 1975;41(5):1281–90.Google Scholar
  56. Nathanson MH, Saidel GM. Multiple-objective criteria for optimal experimental design: application to ferrokinetics. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:378–86.Google Scholar
  57. Nielsen PMF, Malcolm DTK, Hunter PJ, Charette PG. Instrumentation and procedures for estimating the constitutive parameters of inhomogeneous elastic membranes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2002;1(3):211–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Noorlander ML, Melis P, Jonker A, van Noorden CJF. A quantitative method to determine the orientation of collagen fibers in the dermis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50(11):1469–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ogden RW, Saccomandi G, Sgura I. Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data. Comput Mech. 2004;34(6):484–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pope AJ, Sands GB, Smaill BH, LeGrice IJ. Three-dimensional transmural organization of perimysial collagen in the heart. Am J Physiol-Heart C. 2008;295(3):1243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reihsner R, Balogh B, Menzel EJ. Two-dimensional elastic properties of human skin in terms of an incremental model at the in vivo configuration. Med Eng Phys. 1995;17(4):304–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sacks M. Biaxial mechanical evaluation of planar biological materials. J Elast. 2000;61:199–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sacks MS. Incorporation of experimentally-derived fiber orientation into a structural constitutive model for planar collagenous tissues. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125(2):280–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sacks M, Smith DB, Hiester E. A small angle light scattering device for planar connective tissue microstructural analysis. Ann Biomed Eng. 1997;25:678–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sands GB, Gerneke DA, Hooks DA, Green CR, Smaill BH, LeGrice IJ. Automated imaging of extended tissue volumes using confocal microscopy. Microsc Res Tech. 2005;67(5):227–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sands G, Goo S, Gerneke D, LeGrice I, Loiselle D. The collagenous microstructure of cardiac ventricular trabeculae carneae. J Struct Biol. 2011;173(1):110–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Silver F, Kato Y, Ohno M, Wasserman A. Analysis of mammalian connective tissue: relationship between hierarchical structures and mechanical properties. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1992;2(2–3):165–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Smaill B, Hunter P. Structure and function of the diastolic heart. In: Theory of heart: biomechanics, biophysics, and nonlinear dynamics of cardiac function. New York: Springer; 1991. p. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spurr BD, Koutbeiy MA. A comparison of various methods for estimating the parameters in mixtures of von mises distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 1991;20:725–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sweat F, Puchtler H, Rosenthal SI. Sirius red f3ba as a stain for connective tissue. Arch Pathol. 1964;78:69–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tong P, Fung YC. The stress-strain relationship for the skin. J Biomech. 1976;9(10):649–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Brocklin D, Ellis DG. A study of the mechanical behavior of toe extensor tendons under applied stress. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1965;46:369–73.Google Scholar
  73. van Zuijlen P, Ruurda J, van Veen H, van Marle J, van Trier A, Groenevelt F, Kreis R, Middelkoop E. Collagen morphology in human skin and scar tissue: no adaptations in response to mechanical loading at joints. Burns. 2003;29(5):423–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vawter DL, Fung YC, West JB. Elasticity of excised dog lung parenchyma. J Appl Physiol. 1978;45(2):261–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Viidik A. Biology of Collagen. Viidik A, Vuust J, editors. London: Academic Press; 1980;239–355Google Scholar
  76. Wilkes GL, Brown IA, Wildnauer RH. The biomechanical properties of skin. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng. 1973;1(4):453–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wright DG, Rennels DC. A study of the elastic properties of planar fascia. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46:482–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Yin FC, Strumpf RK, Chew PH, Zeger SL. Quantification of the mechanical properties of noncontracting canine myocardium under simultaneous biaxial loading. J Biomech. 1987;20(6): 577–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Young AA, LeGrice IJ, Young MA, Smaill BH. Extended confocal microscopy of myocardial laminae and collagen network. J Microsc. 1998;192:139–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica W. Y. Jor
    • 1
  • Thiranja P. Babarenda Gamage
    • 1
  • Poul M. F. Nielsen
    • 2
  • Martyn P. Nash
    • 2
  • Peter J. Hunter
    • 1
  1. 1.Auckland Bioengineering InstituteThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Auckland Bioengineering Institute and Department of Engineering ScienceThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations