Undesirable Anisotropy in a Discrete Fiber Bundle Model of Fibrous Tissues
Lanir (J Biomech. 16(1):1–12, 1983) proposed a structural model for the anisotropic response of fibrous tissues with fiber bundles oriented in space by a continuous orientation distribution. Each fiber bundle was assumed to have the same undulation distribution that characterizes its nonlinear elastic response. Recently, a discrete fiber icosahedron model for fibrous soft tissues has been introduced, which is based on fiber bundles parallel to the six lines that connect opposing vertices of a regular icosahedron. Although the parameters in the icosahedron model can be determined to match experimental data for the anisotropic response of various tissues, the icosahedron model predicts anisotropic response when the weights of the six fiber bundles are equal. This chapter quantifies this undesirable anisotropic response and refers to a new icosahedron model based on a generalized invariant which also matches experimental data and analytically reduces to an isotropic form when the weights of the fiber bundles are equal.
KeywordsFiber Bundle Fiber Orientation Structural Tensor Undulation Distribution Strain Energy Function
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This research was partially supported by MB Rubin’s Gerard Swope Chair in Mechanics. The authors would also like to acknowledge helpful discussions with A Rubin about the equal area model.
Bazant Z, Oh BH. Microplane model for progressive fracture of concrete and rock. J Eng Mech ASCE. 1985;111(4):559–82.Google Scholar
Bazant ZP, Oh BH. Efficient numerical integration on the surface of a sphere. Z Angew Math Mech. 1986;66(1):37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen RM. Mechanics of low density materials. J Mech Phys Solids. 1986;34(6):563–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen RM. Sufficient symmetry conditions for isotropy of the elastic moduli tensor. J Appl Mech. 1987;54(4):772–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehret AE, Itskov M, Schmid H. Numerical integration on the sphere and its effect on the material symmetry of constitutive equations—a comparative study. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2010;81(2):189–206.Google Scholar
Elata D, Rubin MB. Isotropy of strain energy functions which depend only on a finite number of directional strain measures. J Appl Mech. 1994;61(2):284–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elata D, Rubin MB. A new representation for the strain energy of anisotropic elastic materials with application to damage evolution in brittle materials. Mech Mater. 1995;19(2–3):171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn C, Rubin MB. An anisotropic discrete fibre model based on a generalised strain invariant with application to soft biological tissues. Int J Eng Sci. 2012;60:66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn C, Rubin MB, Nielsen P. A model for the anisotropic response of fibrous soft tissues using six discrete fibre bundles. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 2011;27(11):1793–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itskov M, Ehret AE. A universal model for the elastic, inelastic and active behaviour of soft biological tissues. GAMM-Mitteilungen. 2009;32(2):221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itskov M, Ehret AE, Dargazany R. A full-network rubber elasticity model based on analytical integration. Math Mech Solids. 2010;15:655–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanir Y. Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J Biomech. 1983;16(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2016