The Importance of Workplace Social Relations in the Return to Work Process: A Missing Piece in the Return to Work Puzzle?
The chapter elaborates how workplace social relations influence practice in the return to work process. The social conditions in which the return to work process is embedded, and the way social interaction and relations between the sick-listed worker and other workplace actors (supervisor and coworkers) evolve, have only been researched to a limited extent. In this book chapter, we will discuss critical new dimensions of social relations research in the field of return to work that can “make” or “break” a workplace return to work process. These critical new dimensions highlight the importance of viewing return to work as a dynamic process over time, where supervisors and coworkers display shifting roles depending on phases of the process. The chapter conveys new dimensions of social relations, acknowledging the positive contribution of coworker efforts in the process, which may have an important impact on workplace-based return to work interventions.
KeywordsSocial Relation Sickness Absence Work Ability Work Process Work Task
- Anema, J. R., Schellart, A. J., Cassidy, J. D., Loisel, P., Veerman, T. J., & van der Beek, A. J. (2009). Can cross country differences in return to work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(4), 419–426.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arends, I., van der Klink, J. J., & Bultmann, U. (2010). Prevention of recurrent sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders: Design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial with cost-benefit and effectiveness evaluation. BMC Public Health, 10, 132.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker-McClearn, D., Greasley, K., Dale, J., & Griffith, F. (2010). Absence management and presenteeism: The pressures on employees to attend work and the impact of attendance on performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 311–328.Google Scholar
- Brouwer, S., Krol, B., Reneman, M. F., Bultmann, U., Franche, R. L., van der Klink, J. J., et al. (2009). Behavioral determinants as predictors of return to work after long-term sickness absence: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(2), 166–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carroll, C., Rick, J., Pilgrim, H., Cameron, J., & Hillage, J. (2010). Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(8), 607–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eakin, J. M., MacEachen, E., & Clarke, J. (2003). ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: Small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 1(2), 19–42.Google Scholar
- Elfering, A., Semmer, N. K., Schade, V., Grund, S., & Boos, N. (2002). Supportive colleague, unsupportive supervisor: The role of provider-specific constellations of social support at work in the development of low back pain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(2), 130–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Försäkringskassan. (2009). Tidiga arbetsgivarinsatser under sjukperioden. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan.Google Scholar
- Försäkringskassan. (2010). Sjukpenning och samordnad rehabilitering. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan.Google Scholar
- Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
- Loisel, P. (2009). Developing a new paradigm: Work disability prevention. Occupational Health Southern Africa, 15(2), 56–60.Google Scholar
- MacEachen, E., Ferrier, S., Kosny, A., & Chambers, B. (2007). A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return to work policy. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 75–96.Google Scholar
- National Health Service (NHS). (2009). Long-term sickness absence and incapacity for work. Retrieved from NICE website: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11779/43546/43546.pdf.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ståhl, C. (2010). In cooperation we trust. Interorganizational cooperation in return-to-work and labour market reintegration. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
- Walt, G. (1994). Health Policy. An introduction to process and power. Johannesburg, South Africa: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
- Van Oostrom, S. H., Driessen, M. T., de Vet, H. C. W., Franche, R. L., Schonstein, E., Loisel, P., et al. (2009). Workplace interventions for preventing work disability (review). The Cochrane Library, 2, 1–63.Google Scholar
- WorkCover. (2003). Guidelines for employers’ return to work programs NSW: WorkCover. First published Nov 1987; Revised Nov 1993, Dec 1994, May 1997, Mar 2000, June 2002, Mar 2003, Sept 2010.Google Scholar
- Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). (2009). Employers: what are my responsibilities? Retrieved from WSIB website http://www.wsib.on.ca/wsib/wsibsite.nsf/public/Employers.
- Wynne-Jones, G., Buck, R., Porteous, C., Cooper, L., Button, L. A., Main, C. J., et al. (2010). What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar