Advertisement

The Importance of Workplace Social Relations in the Return to Work Process: A Missing Piece in the Return to Work Puzzle?

  • Åsa Tjulin
  • Ellen MacEachen
Part of the Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability book series (SHHDW, volume 1)

Abstract

The chapter elaborates how workplace social relations influence practice in the return to work process. The social conditions in which the return to work process is embedded, and the way social interaction and relations between the sick-listed worker and other workplace actors (supervisor and coworkers) evolve, have only been researched to a limited extent. In this book chapter, we will discuss critical new dimensions of social relations research in the field of return to work that can “make” or “break” a workplace return to work process. These critical new dimensions highlight the importance of viewing return to work as a dynamic process over time, where supervisors and coworkers display shifting roles depending on phases of the process. The chapter conveys new dimensions of social relations, acknowledging the positive contribution of coworker efforts in the process, which may have an important impact on workplace-based return to work interventions.

Keywords

Social Relation Sickness Absence Work Ability Work Process Work Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anema, J. R., Schellart, A. J., Cassidy, J. D., Loisel, P., Veerman, T. J., & van der Beek, A. J. (2009). Can cross country differences in return to work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(4), 419–426.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arends, I., van der Klink, J. J., & Bultmann, U. (2010). Prevention of recurrent sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders: Design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial with cost-benefit and effectiveness evaluation. BMC Public Health, 10, 132.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker-McClearn, D., Greasley, K., Dale, J., & Griffith, F. (2010). Absence management and presenteeism: The pressures on employees to attend work and the impact of attendance on performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 311–328.Google Scholar
  4. Baril, R., Clarke, J., Friesen, M., Stock, S., & Cole, D. (2003). Management of return to work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Social Science & Medicine, 57(11), 2101–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellaby, P. (1990). What is genuine sickness? The relation between work-discipline and the sick role in a pottery factory. Sociology of Health and Illness, 12(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briand, C., Durand, M. J., St-Arnaud, L., & Corbiere, M. (2008). How well do return to work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(2), 207–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brouwer, S., Krol, B., Reneman, M. F., Bultmann, U., Franche, R. L., van der Klink, J. J., et al. (2009). Behavioral determinants as predictors of return to work after long-term sickness absence: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(2), 166–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, C., Rick, J., Pilgrim, H., Cameron, J., & Hillage, J. (2010). Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(8), 607–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa-Black, K. M., Durand, M. J., Imbeau, D., Baril, R., & Loisel, P. (2007). Interdisciplinary team discussion on work environment issues related to low back disability: A multiple case study. Work, 28(3), 249–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa-Black, K. M., Cheng, A. S., Li, M., & Loisel, P. (2011). The practical application of theory and research for preventing work disability: A new paradigm for occupational rehabilitation services in China? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(Suppl 1), S15–S27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Rijk, A., Janssen, N., Van Lierop, B., Alexanderson, K., & Nijhuis, F. (2009). A behavioral approach to RTW after sickness absence: The development of instruments for the assessment of motivational determinants, motivation and key actors’ attitudes. Work, 33(3), 273–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Deyo, R. A., & Diehl, A. K. (1986). Patient satisfaction with medical care for low-back pain. Spine, 11(1), 28–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eakin, J. M. (1992). Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspective on the management of health and safety in small workplaces. International Journal of Health Services, 22(4), 689–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eakin, J. M., & MacEachen, E. (1998). Health and social relations of work: A study of health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20(6), 896–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eakin, J. M., MacEachen, E., & Clarke, J. (2003). ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: Small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 1(2), 19–42.Google Scholar
  16. Ekbladh, E., Thorell, L. H., & Haglund, L. (2010). Perceptions of the work environment among people with experience of long term sick leave. Work, 35(2), 125–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elfering, A., Semmer, N. K., Schade, V., Grund, S., & Boos, N. (2002). Supportive colleague, unsupportive supervisor: The role of provider-specific constellations of social support at work in the development of low back pain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(2), 130–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fambrough, M. J., & Comerford, S. A. (2006). The changing epistemological assumptions of group theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3), 330–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franche, R. L., & Krause, N. (2002). Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12(4), 233–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Franche, R. L., Baril, R., Shaw, W., Nicholas, M., & Loisel, P. (2005a). Workplace-based return to work interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 525–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Franche, R. L., Cullen, K., Clarke, J., Irvin, E., Sinclair, S., & Frank, J. (2005b). Workplace-based return to work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 607–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Friesen, M. N., Yassi, A., & Cooper, J. (2001). Return to work: The importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work, 17(1), 11–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Försäkringskassan. (2009). Tidiga arbetsgivarinsatser under sjukperioden. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan.Google Scholar
  24. Försäkringskassan. (2010). Sjukpenning och samordnad rehabilitering. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, D. (2000). Barriers to the implementation of management systems: lessons from the past. Quality Assurance, 8(1), 3–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gates, L. (2000). Workplace accommodation as a social process. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hepburn, C. G., Kelloway, E. K., & Franche, R. L. (2010). Early employer response to workplace injury: What injured workers perceive as fair and why these perceptions matter. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(4), 409–420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hetzler, A. (2003). Barriers to rehabilitation outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 5(1), 42–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmgren, K., & Dahlin Ivanoff, S. (2004). Women on sickness absence – Views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(4), 213–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Holmgren, K., & Dahlin Ivanoff, S. (2007). Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17(1), 93–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoogendoorn, W. E., van Poppel, M. N., Bongers, P. M., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (2000). Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine, 25(16), 2114–2125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Krause, N., Dasinger, L. K., & Neuhauser, F. (1998). Modified work and returns to work: A review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 8(2), 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kosny, A., MacEachen, E., Ferrier, S., & Chambers, L. (2011). The role of health care providers in long term and complicated workers’ compensation claims. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(4), 582–590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuijer, W., Groothoff, J. W., Brouwer, S., Geertzen, J. H., & Dijkstra, P. U. (2006). Prediction of sickness absence in patients with chronic low back pain: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 16(3), 439–467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Larsson, A., & Gard, G. (2003). How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers’ perspective. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 13(3), 169–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Linton, S. J. (2000). A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine, 25(9), 1148–1156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Linton, S. J., Gross, D., Schultz, I. Z., Main, C., Cote, P., Pransky, G., et al. (2005). Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 459–474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Loisel, P., Abenhaim, L., Durand, P., Esdaile, J. M., Suissa, S., Gosselin, L., et al. (1997). A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine, 22(24), 2911–2918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Loisel, P., Buchbinder, R., Hazard, R., Keller, R., Scheel, I., van Tulder, M., et al. (2005a). Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 507–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Loisel, P., Durand, M. J., Baril, R., Gervais, J., & Falardeau, M. (2005b). Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: Perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 581–590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Loisel, P. (2009). Developing a new paradigm: Work disability prevention. Occupational Health Southern Africa, 15(2), 56–60.Google Scholar
  43. Lysaght, R. M., & Larmour-Trode, S. (2008). An exploration of social support as a factor in the return to work process. Work, 30(3), 255–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. MacEachen, E., Clarke, J., Franche, R. L., & Irvin, E. (2006). Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32(4), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacEachen, E., Ferrier, S., Kosny, A., & Chambers, B. (2007). A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return to work policy. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 75–96.Google Scholar
  46. MacEachen, E., Kosny, A., Ferrier, S., & Chambers, L. (2010). The “toxic dose” of system problems: Why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(3), 349–366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. MacEachen, E., Kosny, A., Ferrier, S., Lippel, K., Neilson, C., Franche, R. L., et al. (2012). The ‘ability’ paradigm in vocational rehabilitation: challenges in an Ontario injured worker Retraining Program. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22(1), 105–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. National Health Service (NHS). (2009). Long-term sickness absence and incapacity for work. Retrieved from NICE website: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11779/43546/43546.pdf.
  49. Nordqvist, C., Holmqvist, C., & Alexanderson, K. (2003). Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 13(1), 11–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Parsons, J. A., Eakin, J. M., Bell, R. S., Franche, R. L., & Davis, A. M. (2008). “So, are you back to work yet?” Re-conceptualizing ‘work’ and ‘return to work’ in the context of primary bone cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 67(11), 1826–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Pincus, T., Burton, A. K., Vogel, S., & Field, A. P. (2002). A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine, 27(5), E109–E120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pransky, G., Shaw, W., Franche, R. L., & Clarke, A. (2004). Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers – current models and opportunities for improvement. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(11), 625–634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pransky, G., Gatchel, R., Linton, S. J., & Loisel, P. (2005). Improving return to work research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 453–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Reme, S. E., Hagen, E. M., & Eriksen, H. R. (2009). Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10, 139.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Roberts-Yates, C. (2003). The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: the need for new operational frameworks. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(16), 898–907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Schultz, I. Z., Stowell, A. W., Feuerstein, M., & Gatchel, R. J. (2007). Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17(2), 327–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Schultz, I. Z. (2008). Disentangling the disability quagmire in psychological injury: Part 1 – disability and return to work: theories, methods, and applications. Psychological Injury and Law, 1, 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Svensson, T., & Bjorklund, A. (2010). Focus on health, motivation, and pride: a discussion of three theoretical perspectives on the rehabilitation of sick-listed people. Work, 36(3), 273–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Shaw, W. S., Robertson, M. M., Pransky, G., & McLellan, R. K. (2003). Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 13(3), 129–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Shaw, W. S., & Huang, Y. H. (2005). Concerns and expectations about returning to work with low back pain: Identifying themes from focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(21), 1269–1281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaw, W. S., Robertson, M. M., McLellan, R. K., Verma, S., & Pransky, G. (2006). A controlled case study of supervisor training to optimize response to injury in the food processing industry. Work, 26(2), 107–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Shaw, W., Hong, Q. N., Pransky, G., & Loisel, P. (2008). A literature review describing the role of return to work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 2–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaw, W. S., van der Windt, D. A., Main, C. J., Loisel, P., & Linton, S. J. (2009). Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“blue flags”) in back disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(1), 64–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Shrey, D. E. (2000). Worksite disability management model for effective return to work planning. Occupational Medicine, 15(4), 789–801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Ståhl, C. (2010). In cooperation we trust. Interorganizational cooperation in return-to-work and labour market reintegration. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  67. Tjulin, A., Edvardsson Stiwne, E., & Ekberg, K. (2009). Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return to work programme. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(4), 409–418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Tjulin, A., MacEachen, E., & Ekberg, K. (2010). Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return to work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(3), 311–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Tjulin, A., MacEachen, E., & Ekberg, K. (2011a). Exploring the meaning of early contact in return to work from workplace actors’ perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(2), 137–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Tjulin, A., MacEachen, E., Edvardsson Stiwne, E., & Ekberg, K. (2011b). The social interaction of return to work explored from coworkers experiences. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(21–22), 1979–1989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Waddell, G., Newton, M., Henderson, I., Somerville, D., & Main, C. J. (1993). A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain, 52(2), 157–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Waddell, G., & Burton, A. K. (2005). Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. Best Practice and Research Clinical Rheumatology, 19(4), 655–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Walt, G. (1994). Health Policy. An introduction to process and power. Johannesburg, South Africa: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Van Oostrom, S. H., Driessen, M. T., de Vet, H. C. W., Franche, R. L., Schonstein, E., Loisel, P., et al. (2009). Workplace interventions for preventing work disability (review). The Cochrane Library, 2, 1–63.Google Scholar
  75. Verbeek, J., Sengers, M. J., Riemens, L., & Haafkens, J. (2004). Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Spine, 29(20), 2309–2318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. WorkCover. (2003). Guidelines for employers’ return to work programs NSW: WorkCover. First published Nov 1987; Revised Nov 1993, Dec 1994, May 1997, Mar 2000, June 2002, Mar 2003, Sept 2010.Google Scholar
  77. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). (2009). Employers: what are my responsibilities? Retrieved from WSIB website http://www.wsib.on.ca/wsib/wsibsite.nsf/public/Employers.
  78. Wynne-Jones, G., Buck, R., Porteous, C., Cooper, L., Button, L. A., Main, C. J., et al. (2010). What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Young, A. E., Roessler, R. T., Wasiak, R., McPherson, K. M., van Poppel, M. N., & Anema, J. R. (2005a). A developmental conceptualization of return to work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 557–568.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Young, A. E., Wasiak, R., Roessler, R. T., McPherson, K. M., Anema, J. R., & van Poppel, M. N. (2005b). Return to work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 543–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Young, A. E. (2010a). Employment maintenance and the factors that impact it after vocational rehabilitation and return to work. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(20), 1621–1632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Young, A. E. (2010b). Return to work following disabling occupational injury-facilitators of employment continuation. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment Health, 36(6), 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Helath Care and Social WelfareMälardalens UniversityVästeråsSweden
  2. 2.School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations