Skip to main content

Management of Spondyloptosis

  • Chapter
Spondylolisthesis

Abstract

Spondyloptosis is a condition characterized by complete slip of one vertebral body over another, more commonly seen at the L5 on S1. High-grade slips and spondyloptosis have been associated with high pelvic incidence which increases the shear forces across the lumbosacral junction which further aggravates the slip angle. Additionally, posterior element defects have been noted in a high percentage of patients. Spondyloptosis is often associated with back pain and symptoms of spinal canal stenosis along with sagittal plan deformity with or without compensatory coronal plane deformity. While conservative management is usually the first line of treatment, surgical intervention is often required to control patient symptoms. The surgical management for high-grade slips including spondyloptosis is controversial and ranges from neural decompression, In situ fusion, partial or complete reduction of slip with or without vertebral resection. In this chapter, we will review the different approaches to this problem described in the literature. The surgeon should tailor the best management for the patient based on symptoms and magnitude of deformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Meyerding HW. Low backache and sciatic pain associated with spondylolisthesis and protruded intervertebral disc: incidence, significance and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1941;23:461–70.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wiltse L, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop. 1976;117:23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Curylo LJ, Edwards C, Dewald RW. Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine. 2002;27(18):2021–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taillard W. Les Spondylolisthesis chez l'enfant et l'adolescent. Acta Orthop Scand. 1955;24:115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boisaubert B, Montigny JP, Duval-Beaupere G, et al. Incidence, sacrum, spondylolisthesis. Rachis. 1997;9:187–92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5-s1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine. 2005;30:S27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsunaga S, Ijiri K, Hayashi K. Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 10- to 18-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:194–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seitsalo S. Operative and conservative treatment of moderate spondylolisthesis in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:908–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ, et al. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:699–707.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Floman Y. Progression of lumbosacral ishtmic spondylolisthesis in adults. Spine. 2000;25:342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith JA, Deviren V, Berven S, et al. Clinical outcome of trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for high-grade l5-s1 spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2001;26:2227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by anterior and posterior reduction and stabilization. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1060–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradford D. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis: a combined approach for reduction and stabilization. Spine. 1979;4:423–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradford D, Gotfried Y. Staged salvage reconstruction of grade IV and V spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:191–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaines RW, Nichols WK. Treatment of spondyloptosis by two stage L5 vertebrectomy and reduction of L4 onto S1. Spine. 1985;10:680–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalra K, et al. A modified Gaines procedure for spondyloptosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1589–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:80–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Martino A, et al. Spontaneous fusion of L5 spondyloptosis: should we learn from nature? Spine J. 2012;12(6):529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Kobayashi T, et al. Influence of acute shortening on the spinal cord: an experimental study. Spine. 2005;30:613–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bohlman HH, Cook SS. One-stage decompression and posterolateral and interbody fusion for lumbosacral spondyloptosis through a posterior approach. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:415–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laursen M, Thomsen K, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Functional outcome after partial reduction and 360 degree fusion in grade III-V spondylolisthesis in adolescent and adult patients. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12:300–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Anterior column support in surgery for high-grade, isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;394:109–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Moe JH. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979;61A:479–95.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ishikawa S, Kumar SJ, Torres BC. Surgical treatment of dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Results after in situ fusion. Spine. 1994;19:1691–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, et al. Dowel fibular strut grafts for high-grade dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2002;27:1982–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoenecker PL, Cole HO, Herring JA, et al. Cauda equina syndrome after in situ arthrodesis for severe spondylolisthesis at the lumbosacral junction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:369–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sailhan F, Gollogly S, Roussouly P. The radiographic results and neurologic complications of instrumented reduction and fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis without decompression of the neural elements: a retrospective review of 44 patients. Spine. 2006;31(2):161–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, et al. An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine. 1996;21:1133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali M. Maziad M.D., M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maziad, A.M., Boachie-Adjei, O. (2015). Management of Spondyloptosis. In: Wollowick, A., Sarwahi, V. (eds) Spondylolisthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7574-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7575-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics