Skip to main content

Decompression and Spinal Fusion in Low Grade Spondylolisthesis

  • Chapter
  • 2533 Accesses

Abstract

Symptomatic spondylolisthesis has three main elements: symptoms due to neurologic compression, progressive spondylolisthesis, and low back pain arising from instability and loss of sagittal balance. This chapter focuses on surgical decompression for neurologic compression and fusion with and without instrumentation for instability. Local segmental balance and global sagittal balance is a key component of adequate treatment and better outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Takino T, Matsui T, Tomita K. Epidural pressure measurements. Relationship between epidural pressure and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20(6):650–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi K, Kagechika K, Takino T, Matsui T, Miyazaki T, Shima I. Changes in epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20(24):2746–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sengupta D, Herkowitz H. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies. Spine. 2005;30(6 Suppl):S71–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Montgomery D, Fischgrund J. Passive reduction of spondylolisthesis on the operating room table: a prospective study. J Spinal Disord. 1994;7(2):167–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herkowitz H, Kurz L. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(6):802–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischgrund J, Mackay M, Herkowitz H, Brower R, Montgomery D, Kurz L. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1997;22(24):2807–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakanishi K, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Okuda T, Kamei N, Nakamae T, et al. Medium-term clinical results of microsurgical lumbar flavectomy that preserves facet joints in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of bilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression by a unilateral approach. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26(7):351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsudaira K, Yamazaki T, Seichi A, Takeshita K, Hoshi K, Kishimoto J, et al. Spinal stenosis in grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study of outcomes following laminoplasty and laminectomy with instrumented spinal fusion. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(3):270–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis R, Errico T, Bae H, Auerbach J. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. Spine. 2013;38(18):1529–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomleksiz C, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer A. A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:629698.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris E, Sayadipour A, Massey P, Duplantier N, Anderson D. Mini-open versus open decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis. Am J Orthop. 2011;40(12):E257–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boissiere L, Perrin G, Rigal J, Michel F, Barrey C. Lumbar-sacral fusion by a combined approach using interbody PEEK cage and posterior pedicle-screw fixation: clinical and radiological results from a prospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(8):945–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson P, Tribus C, Kitchel S. Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(6):463–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kornblum M, Fischgrund J, Herkowitz H, Abraham D, Berkower D, Ditkoff J. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine. 2004;29(7):726–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Suda K, Ito M, Abumi K, Haba H, Taneichi H, Kaneda K. Radiological risk factors of pseudoarthrosis and/or instrument breakage after PLF with the pedicle screw system in isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(8):541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinstein J, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Hanscom B, Tosteson A, Blood E, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2257–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein J, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Zhao W, Blood E, Tosteson A, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1295–304.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Zhao W, Morgan TS, Abdu WA, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine. 2014;39(1):3–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wr W, Bono C, Gilbert T, Kreiner D, Mazanec D, Shaffer W, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2009;9(7):609–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi Y, Sato T, Hyodo H, Kawamata T, Takahashi E, Miyatake N, et al. Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: risk factors and anatomic locations: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(2):165–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin C, Gruszczynski A, Braunsfurth H, Fallatah S, O’Neil J, Wai E. The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine. 2007;32(16):1791–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abdu W, Lurie J, Spratt K, Tosteson A, Zhao W, Tosteson T, et al. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method influence outcome? Four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine. 2009;34(21):2351–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaccaro A, Lawrence J, Patel T, Katz L, Anderson D, Fischgrund J, et al. The safety and efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis: a long-term (>4 years) pivotal study. Spine. 2008;33(26):2850–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hurlbert R, Alexander D, Bailey S, Mahood J, Abraham E, McBroom R, et al. rhBMP-2 for posterolateral instrumented lumbar fusion: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2013;38(25):2139–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Santos E, Sembrano J, Mueller B, Polly D. Optimizing iliac screw fixation: a biomechanical study on screw length, trajectory, and diameter. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(2):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glassman S, Dimar J, Puno R, Johnson J, Shields C, Linden R. A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw placement with computed tomographic scan confirmation. Spine. 1995;20(12):1375–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh K, Ahmadinia K, Park D, Nandyala S, Marquez-Lara A, Patel A, et al. Complications of spinal fusion with utilization of bone morphogenic protein. A systematic review of the literature. Spine. 2014;39:91–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelly MP, Savage JW, Bentzen SM, Hsu WK, Ellison SA, Anderson PA. Cancer risk from bone morphogenetic protein exposure in spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(17):1417–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cooper GS, Kou TD. Risk of cancer after lumbar fusion surgery with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rh-BMP-2). Spine. 2013;38(21):1862–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Dimar II M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dimar, J.R., Kuo, C.C., Cordiale, A.J. (2015). Decompression and Spinal Fusion in Low Grade Spondylolisthesis. In: Wollowick, A., Sarwahi, V. (eds) Spondylolisthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7574-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7575-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics