Skip to main content

Surgical Techniques: Spondylolysis Repair

  • Chapter
Spondylolisthesis

Abstract

Lumbar spondylolysis is a bony defect in the pars interarticularis. The most common presentation is bilateral defects in the pars. The clinical symptom is activity-related back pain in young, athletic patients. The diagnosis is confirmed on radiographs or CT scan. MRI is indicated for atypical presentations, neurological symptoms, or pre-operative grading of the lumbar discs involved. While non-operative management is the mainstay of treatment, surgical intervention is indicated for patients who are not responsive despite adequate period of conservative management such as activity modification (stopping sports), physical therapy, and occasionally bracing. The selection of surgical candidates for pars interarticularis includes age, duration of the pain, and responsiveness to a pars block (pain relief after guided injection into the pars with local analgesia and steroid), segmental instability, discal health below the spondylolytic segments and laterality of the defect. The surgical technique has evolved over time. Segmental fusion is not advocated in the young population. The techniques of pars interarticularis repair using direct laminar/pars compression screw fixation or a pedicle screw, rod, and laminar hook construct are described. Overall successful outcome is reported in 90 % of patients. Potential complications include nerve root injury, implant breakage or dislodgement, non-union, infection, and conversion to segmental fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ariyoshi M, et al. Spondylolysis at three sites in the same lumbar vertebra. Int J Sports Med. 1999;20(1):56–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen MR, et al. Anatomic variability of 120 L5 spondylolytic defects. Global Spine J. 2013;3(4):243–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharifi G, et al. Bilateral three-level lumbar spondylolysis repaired by hook-screw technique. Global Spine J. 2012;2(1):51–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beutler WJ, et al. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(10):1027–35. discussion 1035.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borkow SE, Kleiger B. Spondylolisthesis in the newborn. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971;81:73–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Inceoglu S, Mageswaran P. Multi-scale finite element modelling at the posterior lumbar vertebra: analysis of pedicle stresses due to pars fracture. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2014;17(7):787–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillet P, Petit M. Direct repair of spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(12):1252–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hioki A, et al. Repair of pars defects by segmental transverse wiring for athletes with symptomatic spondylolysis: relationship between bony union and postoperative symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(9):802–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck NA, et al. Do oblique views add value in the diagnosis of spondylolysis in adolescents? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(10):e65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saifuddin A, et al. Orientation of lumbar pars defects: implications for radiological detection and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):208–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sairyo K, Sakai T, Yasui N. Conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis in childhood and adolescence: the radiological signs which predict healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(2):206–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suh PB, Esses SI, Kostuik JP. Repair of pars interarticularis defect. The prognostic value of pars infiltration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(8 Suppl):S445–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Menga EN, et al. Clinical results and functional outcomes after direct intralaminar screw repair of spondylolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(1):104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu SS, Lee CH, Chen PQ. Operative repair of symptomatic spondylolysis following a positive response to diagnostic pars injection. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12(1):10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai LY, et al. Direct repair of defect in lumbar spondylolysis and mild isthmic spondylolisthesis by bone grafting, with or without facet joint fusion. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(1):78–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith JA, Hu SS. Management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the pediatric and adolescent population. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(3):487–99. ix.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicol RO, Scott JH. Lytic spondylolysis. Repair by wiring. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986;11(10):1027–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Szypryt EP, et al. The prevalence of disc degeneration associated with neural arch defects of the lumbar spine assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14(9):977–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schlenzka D, et al. Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(10):1437–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai LY. Disc degeneration in patients with lumbar spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(6):478–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfirrmann CW, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(17):1873–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimura M. My method of filing the lesion with spongy bone in spondylolysis and spondylolistesis. Seikei Geka. 1968;19(4):285–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Salib RM, Pettine KA. Modified repair of a defect in spondylolysis or minimal spondylolisthesis by pedicle screw, segmental wire fixation, and bone grafting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(4):440–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Giudici F, et al. Long-term results of the direct repair of spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 1:S115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52(3):432–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morscher E, Gerber B, Fasel J. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and direct stabilization of spondylolysis by means of a hook screw. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103(3):175–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H. Repair of defects in spondylolysis by segmental pedicular screw hook fixation. A preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(17):2041–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Altaf F, et al. Repair of spondylolysis using compression with a modular link and screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):73–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan J, et al. Direct repair of spondylolysis by TSRH’s hook plus screw fixation and bone grafting: biomechanical study and clinical report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(2):209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mihara H, et al. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(3):235–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Karatas AF, et al. Comparison of direct pars repair techniques of spondylolysis in pediatric and adolescent patients: pars compression screw versus pedicle screw-rod-hook. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 PMID: 23075858.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shin MH, et al. Direct pars repair surgery using two different surgical methods: pedicle screw with universal hook system and direct pars screw fixation in symptomatic lumbar spondylosis patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;51(1):14–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suken A. Shah M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lau, LL., Shah, S.A. (2015). Surgical Techniques: Spondylolysis Repair. In: Wollowick, A., Sarwahi, V. (eds) Spondylolisthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7575-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7574-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7575-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics