Advertisement

Tier 3 Primary Grade Reading Interventions: Can We Distinguish Necessary from Sufficient?

  • Stephanie Al OtaibaEmail author
  • Jill Allor
  • Miriam Ortiz
  • Luana Greulich
  • Jeanie Wanzek
  • Joseph Torgesen
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to describe tier 3 reading interventions used for primary grade students (in kindergarten through third grade). Within multi-tier response-to-intervention systems, tier 3 is reserved for the very few students with the most persistent reading difficulties, having demonstrated significant difficulties in learning to read even with tier 1 and tier 2 supports. As explained in greater detail, tier 3 may be a last layer of intervention in general education that serves as part of a prereferral process or it may be special education. Following the description of the conceptual framework for the chapter, and the discussion of variability in tier 3 implementation, the literature is reviewed to learn whether it is known what is necessary and sufficient to help students who are struggling to read, including students with reading or mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities. Implications for research are discussed and directions for future research are identified.

References

  1. Adams, M. J., Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., et al. (2000). Open court reading. Columbus: SRA.Google Scholar
  2. Al Otaiba, S., & Torgesen, J. (2007). Effects from intensive standardized kindergarten and first grade interventions for the prevention of reading difficulties. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 212–222). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). To wait in tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first grade response to intervention (RTI) in reading. Exceptional Children, 81 (1) 11–27. doi:10.1177/0014402914532234.Google Scholar
  4. Allor, J. H., & Mathes, P. (2012). Early interventions in reading: Level K. Columbus: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Allor, J. H., Mathes, P., Roberts, J. K., Cheatham, J. P., & Champlin, T. M. (2010a). Comprehensive reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Finding from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 445–466.Google Scholar
  6. Allor, J. H., Mathes, P., Roberts, J. K., Jones, F., & Champlin, T. (2010b). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disabilities to read: An Experimental examination of a comprehensive reading intervention. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 3–22.Google Scholar
  7. Allor, J. H., Champlin, T. M., Gifford, D. B., & Mathes, P. G. (2010c). Methods for increasing the intensity of reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 500–511.Google Scholar
  8. Allor, J. H., Mathes, P., Roberts, K., Cheatham, J. P., & Al Otaiba, S. (2014). Is scientifically-based reading instruction effective for students with Below-Average IQs? Exceptional Children, 80, 289–308. doi:10.1177/0014402914522208.Google Scholar
  9. Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, A. L., Palincsar, A. S., & Purcell, L. (1986). The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 105–143). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. (Poor readers: Teach, don’t label).Google Scholar
  12. Burns, M. K., & Wagner, D. (2008). Determining an effective intervention within a brief experimental analysis for reading: A meta-analytic review. School Psychology Review, 37, 126–136.Google Scholar
  13. Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., Gilbert, J. K., Barquero, L. A., Cho, E., & Crouch, R. C. (2010). Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 327–340.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Compton, D. L., Gilbert, J. K., Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Cho, E., Barquero, L. A., & Bouton, B. (2012). Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to tier 3 instruction: What level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 204–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Daggett, W. R. (2012). Achieving reading proficiency for all. http://www.leadered.com/pdf/Reading%20White%20Paper.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2015.
  17. Daly, E. J., III, & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459–469.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Daly, E. J., III, Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Dool, E. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554–574.Google Scholar
  19. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83–94.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daly, E. J., III, Andersen, M., Gortmaker, V., & Turner, A. (2006). Using experimental analysis to identify reading fluency interventions: Connecting the dots. The Behavior Analyst, 7(1), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  23. Denton, C. A. (2012). Response to Intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 232–243.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., & Frances, D. J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447–466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., III, & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: a brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271–281.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E. C. (1995). Reading mastery I I/I fast cycle. Worthington, DC: SRA Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Linking assessment to instructional intervention: An overview. School Psychology Review, 15, 318–323.Google Scholar
  29. Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Lambert, W. (in press). First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status. Journal of Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  31. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness to instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  36. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harn, B. A., Chard, D. J., Biancarosa, G., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2011). Coordinating instructional supports to accelerate at-risk first-grade readers’ performance. Elementary School Journal, 112, 332–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoover, J. J., Eppolito, A., Klingner, J. K., & Baca, L. (2012). Collaborative decision-making in multicultural contexts. In J. B. Crockett, B. S. Billingsley, & M. L. Boscardin (Eds.), Handbook of leadership and administration for special education (pp. 191–208). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Ihnot, C., Mastoff, J., Gavin, J., & Hendrickson, L. (2001). Read naturally. St. Paul: Read Naturally.Google Scholar
  40. Jenkins, J. R., Schiller, E., Blackorby, J., Kalb Thayer, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2013). Response to intervention in reading: architecture and practices. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 36(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Readings for strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. Klingner, J. K., & Harry, B. (2006). The special education referral and decision-making process for english language learners: Child study team meetings and placement conferences. Teachers College Record, 108, 2247–2281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lemons, C. J., & Fuchs, D. (2010). Modeling response to reading intervention in children with down syndrome: An examination of predictors of differential growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 134–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lentz, F. E., Jr. (1988). Effective reading interventions in the regular classroom. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M L. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 351–370). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  46. Lonigan, C. J., & Shanahan, T. (2009). Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel. executive summary. A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
  47. Maslen, B. L., & Maslen, J. R. (1987). The Bob books. West Linn: Bob Books Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Mathes, P. G., & Torgesen, J. K. (2005). Early interventions in reading, Level 1. Columbus: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  49. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McGuiness, C., McGuiness, D., & McGuiness, G. (1996). Phono-Graphix: A new method for remediating reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mellard, D. F., McKnight, M., & Woods, K. (2009). Response to intervention screening and progress-monitoring practices in 41 local schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 186–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mellard, D., McKnight, M., & Jordan, J. (2010). RtI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Noell, G. H., Gansle, K. A., Witt, J. C., Whitmarsh, E. L., Freeland, J. T., LaFleur, L. H., et al. (1998). Effects of contingent reward and instruction on oral reading performance at differing levels of passage difficulty. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 659–663.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Noell, G. H., Freeland, J. T., Witt, J. C., & Gansle, K. A. (2001). Using brief assessments to identify effective interventions for individual students. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm. Accessed 1 March 2015.
  56. O’Connor, R. E., Harty, K. R., & Fulmer, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. [RtI]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 532–538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Orosco, M., & Klingner, J. (2010). One school’s implementation of RTI with English language learners: ‘Referring into RTI.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 269–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Petursdottir, A., McMaster, K., McComas, J. J., Bradfield, T., Braganza, V., Koch-McDonald, J., Rodriguez, R., & Scharf, H. (2009). Brief experimental analysis of early reading interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 215–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, 1–57.Google Scholar
  60. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  61. Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program for comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
  62. Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  63. SRA/McGraw-Hill. (1998). Phonics mini books. Columbus: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  64. SRI International. (2002). Special education elementary longitudinal study (SEELS) [Data tables and reports]. http://www.seels.net/grindex.html. Accessed 1 March 2015.
  65. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  66. Texas Education Agency. (1998). Texas primary reading inventory (TPRI). Austin: Author.Google Scholar
  67. Torgesen, J. K. (2005). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Torgesen, J. K., & Burgess, S. R. (1998). Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning reading (pp. 161–188). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  70. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.Google Scholar
  73. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Murray, C. S. (2007). Monitoring response to supplemental services for students at risk for reading difficulties: High and low responders. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 234–243). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Woodruff, T., Murray, C., Wanzek, J., Scammaca, N., et al. (2008). Effects of professional development on improving at-risk students’ performance in reading. In C. R. Greenwood, R. R. Kratochwill, & M. Clements (Eds.), Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools (pp. 115–142). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  75. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C. S., Scammacca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, A. L. (2009). Response to early reading intervention: Examining higher and lower responders. Exceptional Children, 75, 165–183.Google Scholar
  76. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S. G., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to Intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-reading disabled children: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.Google Scholar
  78. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students demonstrating insufficient response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126–142.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2010). Tier 3 interventions for students with significant reading problems. Theory into Practice, 49, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2011). Is a three-tier reading intervention model associated with reduced placement in special education? Remedial and Special Education, 32, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wei, X., Blackorby, J., & Schiller, E. (2011). Growth in reading achievement of students with disabilities, ages 7 to 17. Exceptional Children, 78, 89–106.Google Scholar
  82. Werts, M., Lambert, M., & Carpenter, E. (2009). What special education directors say about RTI. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 245–254.Google Scholar
  83. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, D. R. (2002). Gray oral reading test (4th ed.). Austin: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  85. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Witt, J. C., Daly, E. M., & Noell, G. (2000). Functional assessments: A step by step guide to solving academic and behavior problems. Longmont: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  87. Zirkel, P. A., & Thomas, L. B. (2010). State laws and guidelines for implementing RTI. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(1), 60–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Al Otaiba
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jill Allor
    • 1
  • Miriam Ortiz
    • 1
  • Luana Greulich
    • 2
  • Jeanie Wanzek
    • 3
  • Joseph Torgesen
    • 3
  1. 1.Southern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA
  2. 2.Andrews UniversityBerrien SpringsUSA
  3. 3.Florida Center for Reading ResearchFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations