Biomechanics of Reconstruction Constructs



Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries are common among competitive overhead-throwing athletes. Frank Jobe described the first reconstruction of the UCL in 1976, which consisted of a palmaris longus tendon woven through bone tunnels. In recent years, the advent of new technologies has spawned new procedures that use modern implants. Newer procedures have been developed using suture anchors and interference screws. These newer procedures have been aimed at increasing the strength of fixation and avoiding potential complications. To date, there is a paucity of in vivo research comparing these techniques. The purpose of this chapter is to review the biomechanical data available to support the use of the most common reconstruction techniques currently used.


Ulnar collateral ligament Jobe technique Docking technique Elbow biomechanics Interference screw Overhead-throwing athletes 


  1. 1.
    Feltner ME, Dapena J. Dynamics of the shoulder and elbow joints of the throwing arm of the baseball pitch. Int J Sports Biomech. 1989;5:420–50.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, Dillman CJ, Escamilla RF. Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:233–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jobe FW, Stark H, Lombardo SJ. Reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1158–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith GR, Altchek DW, Pagnani MJ, Keeley JR. A muscle-splitting approach to the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow. Neuroanatomy and operative technique. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:575–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mullen DJ, Goradia VK, Parks BG, Matthews LS. A biomechanical study of stability of the elbow to valgus stress before and after reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:259–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciccotti MG, Siegler S, Kuri JA, Thinnes JH, Murphy DJ. Comparison of the biomechanical profile of the intact ulnar collateral ligament with the modified Jobe and the Docking reconstructed elbow: an in vitro study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:974–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rohrbough JT, Altchek DW, Hyman J, Williams RJ, III, Botts JD. Medial collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow using the docking technique. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:541–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowers AL, Dines JS, Dines DM, Altchek DW. Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: clinical relevance and the docking technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:110–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armstrong AD, Dunning CE, Ferreira LM, Faber KJ, Johnson JA, King GJ. A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:207–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hurbanek JG, Anderson K, Crabtree S, Karnes GJ. Biomechanical comparison of the docking technique with and without humeral bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:526–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langer P, Fadale P, Hulstyn M. Evolution of the treatment options of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:499–506.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hechtman KS, Tjin ATE, Zvijac JE, Uribe JW, Latta LL. Biomechanics of a less invasive procedure for reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:620–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams RJ, III, Urquhart ER, Altchek DW. Medial collateral ligament tears in the throwing athlete. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:579–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahmad CS, Lee TQ, Elattrache NS. Biomechanical evaluation of a new ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique with interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:332–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McAdams TR, Lee AT, Centeno J, Giori NJ, Lindsey DP. Two ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction methods: the docking technique versus bioabsorbable interference screw fixation–a biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:224–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Large TM, Coley ER, Peindl RD, Fleischli JE. A biomechanical comparison of 2 ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:141–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsMedStar Union Memorial HospitalBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsMedStar Union Memorial HospitalBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations