Advertisement

Extensions to Value Efficiency Analysis

Implementing New Features to Value Efficiency Analysis
  • Tarja Joro
  • Pekka J. Korhonen
Chapter
  • 886 Downloads
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 218)

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an overview on possibilities to extend value efficiency analysis. First, we describe how to incorporate additional preference information into the analysis by using the “price” information of inputs and outputs. The extension is made in the spirit of cone ratio approach.

References

  1. Allen R, Athanassopoulos A, Dyson RG, Thanassoulis E (1997) Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directions. Ann Oper Res 73:13–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30:1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazaraa M, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (1993) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98(2):351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halme M, Joro T, Korhonen P, Salo S, Wallenius J (1999) A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 45(1):103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Halme M, Korhonen P (2000) Restricting weights in value efficiency analysis. Eur J Oper Res 126:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Joro T, Korhonen P, Zionts S (2003) An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 149:688–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korhonen P, Laakso J (1986) A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Eur J Oper Res 24:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Korhonen P, Siljamäki A, Soismaa M (2002) On the use of value efficiency analysis and further developments. J Prod Anal 17(1/2):49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Korhonen P, Syrjänen M (2005) On the interpretation of value efficiency. J Prod Anal 24(2):197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thompson RG, Singleton FR Jr, Thrall RM, Smith BA (1986) Comparative site evaluation for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarja Joro
    • 1
  • Pekka J. Korhonen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Operations and Information Systems Alberta School of BusinessUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Information and Service Economy School of BusinessAalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations