Advertisement

Production Possibility Set and Efficiency

Efficiency in Production Possibility Set and General Model
  • Tarja Joro
  • Pekka J. Korhonen
Chapter
  • 932 Downloads
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 218)

Abstract

Many concepts used in DEA are adopted from production economics. One of those concepts is production function f: ℜ m  → ℜ(y = f(x)), where vector x represents inputs and y is one-dimensional output. In this case, it is assumed that a DM can control inputs x. There are possibly other inputs, which are non-controllable. They are taken into account in the structure of function f. Moreover, the term cost function is used to refer to the case, in which there are many outputs and one input, and the DM is assumed to control the outputs, i.e., c: ℜ s  → ℜ (x = c(y)).

Keywords

Efficiency Score Efficient Frontier Production Frontier Projection Direction Production Possibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 39(10):1261–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banker RD, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Thrall RM (2004) Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Oper Res 154:345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borger BD, Ferrier GD, Kerstens K (1998) The choice of a technical efficiency measure of the free disposal hull reference technology: a comparison using US banking data. Eur J Oper Res 105(3):427–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (1994) Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and application. Kluwer, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Theory and application of directional distance functions. J Prod Anal 13:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Färe RS, Grosskopf S, Lovel CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Färe RS, Grosskopf S, Lovel CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Koopmans TC (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation, Cowles Commission monograph no. 13. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Steuer RE (1986) Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Thanassoulis E, Dyson RG (1992) Estimating preferred target input–output levels using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 56:80–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thiele L, Miettinen K, Korhonen P, Molina J (2009) A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization. Evol Comput 17(3):411–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarja Joro
    • 1
  • Pekka J. Korhonen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Operations and Information Systems Alberta School of BusinessUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Information and Service Economy School of BusinessAalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations