mHealth pp 169-185 | Cite as

Research Evidence and Other Information Sources

  • Donna Malvey
  • Donna J. Slovensky


Much of the aggregated information about mHealth is available in grey and trade literature, suggesting a lack of robust information to inform clinical, investment, and policy decisions. In truth, a great deal of valuable information is available. The challenge often lies in knowing where the information is located and in assessing the credibility of the information for decision support. Consumers are indeed challenged by a lack of comprehensive, organized directories and evaluative criteria in choosing apps for personal use. Additionally, providers are similarly challenged in recommending this same type of apps. For apps associated with medical devices, the required FDA approval removes much of the uncertainty. Rigorous, theory-based, and controlled research is essential to inform clinical, policy, and regulatory decisions. However, such research is time- and resource-intensive and involves considerable lag time between the investigation and subsequent publication of findings and recommendations. This type of research is not required for the types of information needed by consumers and app developers, and is not appropriate at all stages of an investigative process. For some questions time sensitivity is more important than statistically validated information. Answers to these types of questions often are found in digital media and other publications of limited circulation. Information consumers must first articulate the intended use of the information, then identify credible sources for accessing the needed information, and apply appropriate criteria for making their decision.


Service Quality Grey Literature Mobile Health Acceptance Behavior mHealth Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2013). Development and validation of an instrument to measure users perceived quality of mHealth. Information and Management, 50(4):181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M. (2013, Sep 19). New Mobile Health App Directory Launches. PRNewswire. Accessed 24 Feb 2014.
  3. AHIMA (n.d.) Mobile Health Apps 101: A Primer for Consumers). Chicago, IL: American Health Information Management Association.
  4. Baum, S. (2013, Dec 12). Happtique suspends mHealth app certification program after software developer exposes security shortcomings. MedCity News.
  5. Collins, F. S. (2011, Winter). Mobile technology and healthcare. NIH Medline Plus 5(4): 2–3.–3.html.
  6. Fiorelli, M., Diviani, N., & Schulz, P. (2013). Mapping mHealth research: A decade of evolution. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grey Literature Report. (2014). What is grey literature? Accessed 19 Feb 2014.
  8. HealthTap Blog. (2013, May 10). “Download Two and Call Me In the Morning”: Doctors review and recommend the best health apps with HealthTap’s all new AppRx. HealthTap
  9. HHS. (2013, Nov). Explore HHS’ Mobile Apps.
  10. IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. (2013, October). Patient apps for improved healthcare: From novelty to mainstream. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Intel Corporation. (n.d.) Getting the most out of going mobile: Best practices in mHealth implementation. FierceMarkets Custom Publishing. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
  12. Kumar, S., Neilse, W. J., Abernathy, A., Atienza, A., Patrick, K., et al. (2013). Mobile health technology: The mHealth evidence workshop. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(2): 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Medullan. (2012). mHealth drivers & barriers—2012 Survey: Healthcare overview. Cambridge, MA: Medullan.Google Scholar
  14. New Mobile Health App Directory. (2013, Sept 19). New Mobile Health App Directory launches. PRWeb Press Release. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
  15. Nilsen, W., Kuman, S., Shar, A., Varoquiers, C., Wiley, T., Riley, W. T., Pavel, M., & Atienza, A. A. (2012). Advancing the science of mHealth. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. PatientView. (2012). European Directory of Health Apps 2012–2013. London: PatientView.Google Scholar
  17. Philbrick, W.C. (2013, January). mHealth and MNCH: State of the evidence. mHealth alliance. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
  18. Solano-Lorente, M., Martinez-Caro, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2013). Designing a framework to develop eLoyalty for online healthcare services. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1):107–115. (ISSN 1479–4411).Google Scholar
  19. Slabodkin, G. (2012, Oct 30). Mobile security a primary concern for docs. FierceMobileHealthcare. Accessed 27 Sept 2013.
  20. Sun, Y., Wang, N., Guo, X., & Peng, Z. (2013). Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: A comparison and integration of alternative models. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(2), 183–200.Google Scholar
  21. Tomlinson, M., Rotheram-Borus, M.J., Swartz, L., & Team, A.C. (2013). Scaling up mHealth: Where is the evidence. PLoS Medicine, 10(2), e10013282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Transparency Market Research. (2013, Jan 08). mHealth market: Global mobile health industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends and forecast 2-12-2018. Accessed 13 Jan 2013.
  23. Whittaker, R. (2012, Sep–Oct). Issues in mHealth: Findings from key informant interviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), e129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Health Management & Informatics, College of Health and Public AffairsUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Health Services Administration, School of Health ProfessionsUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations