Divisional performance measurement: beyond an exclusive profit test

  • Lee D. Parker

Abstract

The measurement of divisional performance in decentralized companies has come to be generally practised by means of a single index of divisional profitability. Accountants have traditionally been placed in the position of designing or adopting a measure of division performance which best ‘represents top management objectives’.1 This has been seen to be best represented by some form of divisional profit index in accordance with accountants’ concentration upon the profit goal of the firm.2 Divisional performance measurement literature has therefore concentrated upon the development and use of a single index of divisional success couched in terms of profit. Alternative indices of divisional profit which have become generally accepted include:
  1. 1.

    Division Net Profit

     
  2. 2.

    Division Controllable Profit

     
  3. 3.

    Division Contribution Margin

     
  4. 4.

    Return on Investment

     
  5. 5.

    Residual Income3

     

Keywords

Income Marketing Expense Rosen Schiff 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 6.
    Refer to A. Fox ‘Industrial Relations: A Social Critique of Pluralist Ideology’ in Man and Organization, J. Child (ed.), George Allen and Unwin, London, 1973, pp. 185–199.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    Refer for instance to E. Mayo, The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Harvard, Boston 1945; R.K. Merton, ‘Bureaucratic Structure and Personality’, in A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations, A. Etzioni (ed.), Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1970, pp. 47-59; P. Selznick, ‘Foundations of the Theory of Organizations’, reprinted in Systems Thinking, F.E. Emery (ed.), Penguin Modern Management Readings, 1969, pp. 261-267Google Scholar
  3. A.H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, Harper, New York, 1954Google Scholar
  4. A.W. Gouldner, Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1954Google Scholar
  5. J.G. March and H.A. Simon, Organizations, Wiley, New York, 1958Google Scholar
  6. D. McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960Google Scholar
  7. C. Argyris, Integrating the Individual and the Organization, Wiley, New York, 1964; andGoogle Scholar
  8. A.S. Tannenbaum, Social Psychology of the Work Organization, Tavistock, London, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    W.G. Scott, ‘Organization Theory: An Overview and an Appraisal’, in Organizations: Structure and behavior, Vol. 1, 2nd Edn, J.A. Litterer (ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    J.W. McGuire, Theories of Business Behaviour, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964, pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    M. Schiff and A.Y. Lewin, Behavioral Aspects of Accounting, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Refer to C. Perrow, Complex Organizations. A Critical Essay, Scott Foresman, Glenview, Illinois, 1972, pp. 160–163 andGoogle Scholar
  13. R.L. Smith, Management Through Accounting, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962, pp. 228–229.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    D. Silverman, The Theory of Organisations: A Sociological Framework, Heinemann, London, 1970, p. 9.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    R.D. Lansbury and P. Gilmour, Organisations: An Australian Perspective, Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, 1977, p. 83.Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    Refer to J.W. McGuire, ‘The Finalité of Business’, in Management and the Behavioral Sciences, M.S. Wadia (ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1968, p. 383 and M.F. Cantley, ‘The Choice of Corporate Objectives’, Long Range Planning, September 1970, pp. 36-42.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    D.L. Huff and J.W. McGuire, ‘The Interdisciplinary Approach to the Study of Business’, reprinted in Management and Organizational Behavior Theories: An Interdisciplinary Approach, W.T. Greenwood (ed.), South Western Publishing Co., Cincinnatti, Ohio, 1965, pp. 94–95. They cite the empirical studies of R.L. Hall and C.J. Hitch, ‘Price Theory and Business Behavior’, Oxford Economic Papers, May 939 and R.A. Lester,’ shortcomings of Marginal Analysis for Wage-Employment Problems’, American Economic Review, March, 1946.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    K.E. Weick, The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1969, pp. 8, 37-38.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    H.J. Leavitt, W.R. Dill, H.B. Eyring, The Organizational World, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1973, pp. 23–25.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    Refer to C. Perrow, op. cit., p. 162 and R.M. Cyert and J.G. March, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963, pp. 4–43, 83-127.Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    D. Solomons, Divisional Performance: Measurement and Control, Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1965, pp. 60, 238.Google Scholar
  22. 38.
    G. Shillinglaw, ‘Divisional Performance Review: An Extension of Budgetary Control’, in Contemporary Cost Accounting and Control, G J. Benston (ed.), Dickenson Publishing Co., Belmont, California, 1970, p. 305.Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    G. Shillinglaw, ‘Toward a Theory of Divisional Income Measurement’, in Contemporary Issues in Cost Accounting, H.R. Anton and P.A. Firmin (eds.), 2nd edition, Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston, 1972, pp. 463–464.Google Scholar
  24. 43.
    E.H. Caplan, Management Accounting and Behavioral Science, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1971, pp. 103–108.Google Scholar
  25. 44.
    A.G. Hopwood, Accounting and Human Behaviour, Accountancy Age Books, London, 1974, p. 3.Google Scholar
  26. 56.
    R. Villers, ‘Control and Freedom in a Decentralized Company’, in Topics in Managerial Accounting, L.S. Rosen (ed.), McGraw-Hill, Toronto, 1970, p. 186.Google Scholar
  27. 57.
    D.N. Duncan, ‘Training Business Managers in General Systems Concepts’, in Man in Systems, M.D. Rubin (ed.), Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1971, pp. 300–303, 310-311.Google Scholar
  28. 63.
    C.H. Hofstede, The Game of Budget Control, Tavistock Publications, London, 1968, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
  29. 65.
    P. Lawrence and J. Lorsch, Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research, Boston, 1967.Google Scholar
  30. 66.
    Refer for instance to G. Shillinglaw, Managerial Cost Accounting, 4th Edition, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1977, pp. 295–317.Google Scholar
  31. 67.
    Refer for instance to G. Shillinglaw, Managerial Cost Accounting, 4th Edition, pp. 744-765. A. Matz and M.F. Usry, Cost Accounting: Planning and Control, South Western Publishing Co., Cincinnatti, Ohio, 1976, p. 502.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee D. Parker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations