Skip to main content

The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: a field study

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a field study aimed at providing a better understanding of how and why managers of corporations with multiple divisions set the levels of achievability of annual profit center budget targets. The data, gathered from 54 profit centers in 12 corporations, show that most budget targets are set to be achievable an average of eight or nine years out to ten. This finding contrasts with the prescription made in most management accounting textbooks suggesting that for optimum motivation budget targets should be achievable less than 50 percent of the time. Managers maintain, however, that these highly achievable targets provide considerable challenge, and the high achievability actually provides many advantages, including improved corporate reporting, resource planning, control, and, combined with other control system elements, even motivation.

Keywords

  • Earning Management
  • Subjective Probability
  • Corporate Manager
  • Account Review
  • Goal Commitment

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_23
  • Chapter length: 25 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4899-7138-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, R.N., G.A. Welsch, and J.S. Reece, Fundamentals of Management Accounting, Fourth Edition (Richard D. Irwin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S., ‘Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Survey,’ Journal of Accounting Literature (Spring 1982), pp. 154-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G.P., M.C. Jensen, and K.J. Murphy, ‘Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory,’ Journal of Finance (July 1988), pp. 593-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., and D. Cervone,’ self-Evaluative and Self-Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal Systems,’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1983), pp. 1012-1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M.E., and L.B. Fräser, III, ‘Conflicting Roles in Budgeting for Operations,’ Harvard Business Review (July-August 1977), pp. 137-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesley, G.R., ‘Elicitation of Subjective Probabilities: A Review,’ The Accounting Review (April 1975), pp. 325-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, C.W., ‘The Effects of Job Standard Tightness and Compensation Scheme on Performance: An Exploration of Linkages,’ The Accounting Review (October 1983), pp. 667-685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, W., and J. Pettijohn, ‘A Survey of Budget-Related Planning and Control Policies and Procedures,’ Journal of Accounting Education (Fall 1985), pp. 61-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J.S., and G.A. Feltham, ‘Economic Incentives in Budgetary Control Systems,’ The Accounting Review (April 1978), pp. 336-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopuch, N., J.G. Birnberg, and J.S. Demski, Cost Accounting: Accounting Data for Management’s Decisions, Third Edition (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R.L.M., ‘Budgeting for Control,’ Administrative Science Quarterly (March 1971), pp. 88-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz, E.G., ‘Accounting, Budgeting, and Control Systems in Their Organizational Context: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 2/3 1983), pp. 153-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, H., ‘Relation of Effort-Performance Expectancy to Performance in Goal-Setting Experiments,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (February 1984), pp. 79-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, M.K., ‘The Effects of Setting Budget Goals and Task Uncertainty on Performance: A Theoretical Analysis,’ The Accounting Review (October 1987), pp. 774-784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.H., The Game of Budget Control (Van Gorcum, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J.R., and H.J. Klein, ‘Goal Commitment and the Goal-Setting Process: Problems, Prospects, and Proposals for Future Research,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (May 1987), pp. 212-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and C.R. Williams, ‘Goal Importance, Self-Focus, and the Goal-Setting Process,’ Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (May 1987), pp. 204-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., ‘Moral Hazard and Observability,’ Bell Journal of Economics (Spring 1979), pp. 74-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A., Accounting and Human Behavior (Prentice-Hall, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C.H., and G. Foster, Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, Seventh Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and G.L. Sundem, Introduction to Management Accounting, Seventh Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, V.L., ‘Effects on Task Difficulty, Goal Setting, and Strategy on Performance of a Heuristic Task,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (August 1985), pp. 492-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,’ Journal of Financial Economics (October 1976), pp. 305-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M., Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, I., ‘Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performances,’ The Accounting Review (October 1979), pp. 707-721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G.P., and T.W. Lee, ‘Goal Setting,’ in E.A. Locke, Ed., Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings (Lexington Books, 1986), pp. 101-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., T. Dembo, L. Festinger, and P.S. Sears, ‘Level of Aspiration,’ in J.M.V. Hunt, Ed., Personality and the Behavior Disorders (The Ronald Press Company, 1944), pp. 333-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A., G.P. Latham, and M. Erez, ‘The Determinants of Goal Commitment,’ Academy of Management Review (1988), pp. 23-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, E. Frederick, C. Lee, and P. Bobko, ‘Effect of Self-Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strategies on Task Performance,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (May 1984), pp. 241-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, K.N. Shaw, L.M. Saari, and G.P. Latham, ‘Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980,’ Psychological Bulletin (July 1981), pp. 125-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, C.O., and D.A. Gioia, ‘Neglected at the Top — Executives Talk About Executive Appraisal,’ Sloan Management Review (Winter 1988), pp. 41-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.A., and R.W. Shaw, ‘An Analysis of Managerial Biasing: Evidence from a Company’s Budgeting Process,’ The Journal of Management Studies (October 1968), pp. 304-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukka, K., ‘Budgetary Biasing in Organizations: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 3, 1988), pp. 281-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, M., The Gamesman: The New Corporate Leaders (Simon & Schuster, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, R.P., Advanced Managerial Accounting (Harper & Row, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui, T., A. Okada, and T. Kakuyama, ‘Influence of Achievement Need on

    Google Scholar 

  • Goal Setting, Performance, and Feedback Effectiveness,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1982), pp. 645-648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K.A., ‘Budgeting and the Propensity to Create Budgetary Slack,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 2, 1985a), pp. 201-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ‘Organizational Controls and Discretionary Program Decision Making: A Field Study,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society (No. 1, 1985b), pp. 67-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ‘How and Why Firms Disregard the Controllability Principle,’ in W.J. Bruns, Jr., and R.S. Kaplan, Eds., Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives (Boston: Harvard Bus. School Press, 1987), pp. 316-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, J.C., R.D. Middlemist, and D. Luther, ‘Joint Effects of Assigned Goal Level and Incentive Structure on Task Performance: A Laboratory Study,’ Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1981), pp. 538-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onsi, M., ‘Factor Analysis of Behavioral Variables Affecting Budgetary Slack,’ The Accounting Review (July 1973), pp. 535-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D.T., Accounting Control and Organizational Behavior (William Heinemann Ltd., 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ‘The Accuracy of Budgetary Estimates: Some Statistical Evidence,’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting (Autumn 1985), pp. 415-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ‘Budgets and Managerial Motivation,’ Journal of General Management (Autumn 1982), pp. 26-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reifenberg, R.J., ‘The Self-Serving Bias and the Use of Objective and Subjective Methods for Measuring Success and Failure,’ Journal of Social Psychology (October 1986), pp. 627-631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockness, H.O., ‘Expectancy Theory in a Budgetary Setting: An Experimental Examination,’ The Accounting Review (October 1977), pp. 893-903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., and E. McAuley, ‘Causal Attributions, Causal Dimensions, and Affective Reactions to Success and Failure,’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (June 1986), pp. 1174-1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidler, J., ‘On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis,’ American Sociological Review (December 1974), pp. 816-831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shillinglaw, G., Managerial Cost Accounting, Fifth Edition (Irwin, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R., ‘Analysis of the Organizational Characteristics Related to Tight Budget Goals,’ Contemporary Accounting Research (1988), forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedry, A.C., Budget Control and Cost Behavior (Prentice-Hall, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and E. Kay, ‘The Effects of Goal Difficulty on Performance: A Field Experiment,’ Behavioral Science (November 1966), pp. 459-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umapathy, S., Current Budgeting Practices in U.S. Industry: The State of the Art (Quorum, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, G.A., R.W. Hilton, and P.N. Gordon, Budgeting: Profit Planning and Control, Fifth Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merchant, K.A., Manzoni, JF. (1989). The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: a field study. In: Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K. (eds) Readings in Accounting for Management Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-41490-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7138-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive