Cell Positioning

  • A. S. G. Curtis
Part of the Receptors and Recognition book series (RERE, volume 4)


The term cell positioning refers to the processes which determine the placing of one cell type with respect to another. The term ‘cell recognition’ is often used loosely for these phenomena but it is rather objectionable partly because of its anthropomorphism and also because it refers to other phenomena as well, such as the capture of degraded serum proteins by certain liver cell types.


Graft Rejection Aggregation Factor Primordial Germ Cell Neural Retina Cell Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antonelli, P.L., Rogers, T.D. and Willard, M.A. (1973), Geometry and the exchange principle in cell aggregation kinetics. J. theor. Biol., 41, 1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balsamo, J. and Lilien, J. (1974a), Embryonic cell aggregation: kinetics and specificity of binding of enhancing factors. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balsamo, J. and Lilien, J. (1974b), Functional identification of three components which mediate tissue-type specific embryonic cell adhesion. Nature., 251, 522–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balsamo, J. and Lilien, J. (1975), The binding of tissue-specific adhesive molecules to the cell surface. A molecular basis for specificity. Biochemistry., 14, 167–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, E.B. and Shand, F.L. (1975), Changes in lymphocyte recirculation and liberation of the adoptive memory response from cellular regulation in the iradiated recipients. Eur. J. Immunol., 5, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burdick, M.L. (1968), A test of the capacity of chick embryo cells to home after vascular dissemination. J. exp. Zool., 167, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burdick, M.L. (1970), Cell sorting out according to species in aggregates containing mouse and chick embryonic limb mesoblast cells. J. exp. Zool., 175, 357–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burdick, M.L. and Steinberg, S. (1969), Embryonic cell adhesiveness: Do species differences exist among warm-blooded vertebrates. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 63, 1169–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crandall, M.A. and Brock, T.D. (1968), Molecular aspects of specific cell contact. Science., 161, 473–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtis, A.S.G. (1962), Cell contact and adhesion. Biol. Rev., 37, 82–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curtis, A.S.G. (1969), The measurement of cell adhesiveness by an absolute method. J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 22, 305–325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtis, A.S.G. (1970a), Problems and some solutions in the study of cellular aggregation. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 25, 335–352.Google Scholar
  13. Curtis, A.S.G. (1970b), Re-examination of a supposed case of specific cell adhesion. Nature., 226, 260–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curtis, A.S.G. (1970c), On the occurrence of specific adhesion between cells. J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 23, 235–272.Google Scholar
  15. Curtis, A.S.G. (1972), Adhesive interactions between organisms. Symposia Br. Soc. Parasitol., 10, 10–21.Google Scholar
  16. Curtis, A.S.G. (1973), Cell adhesion. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 27, 315–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curtis, A.S.G. (1974), The specific control of cell positioning. Arch. Biol., 85, 105–121.Google Scholar
  18. Curtis, A.S.G. (1976), Le positionnement cellulaire et la morphogenese. Bull. Soc, Zool. France., 101, 1–9.Google Scholar
  19. Curtis, A.S.G. (1978), Individuality and graft rejection in sponges OR A cellular basis for individuality in sponges. Biol. and systematics of colonial organisms. (Rosen, B. ed.), in press. Systematics Assoc.Google Scholar
  20. Curtis, A.S.G. and De Sousa, M.A.B. (1973), Factors influencing adhesion of lymphoid cells. Nature New Biol., 244, 45–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Curtis, A.S.G. and De Sousa, M.A.B. (1975), Lymphocyte interactions and positioning. 1. Adhesive interactions. Cellul Immun., 19, 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Curtis, A.S.G. and Greaves, M.F. (1965), The inhibition of cell aggregation by a pure serum protein. J. Embryol exp. Morph. 13, 309–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Curtis, A.S.G. and Hocking, L.M. (1970), Collision efficiency of equal spherical particles in a shear flow. Trans. Faraday Soc. 66, 1381–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Curtis, A.S.G. and Van De Vyver, G. (1971), The control of cell adhesion in a morphogenetic system. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 26, 295–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. De Sousa, M.A.B. and Haston, W.A. (1976), Modulation of B-cell interactions by T cells. Nature., 260, 429–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dubois, R. and Croisille, Y. (1970), Germ-cell line and sexual differentiation in birds. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. ser. B., 259, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Edelstein, B.B. (1970), Cell specific diffusion model of morphogenesis. J. theor. Biol., 30, 515–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elton, R.A. and Tickle, C.A. (1971), The analysis of spatial distributions in mixed cell populations: a statistical method for detecting sorting out. J. Embryol exp. Morph., 26, 135–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ford, W.L. and Simmonds, S.J. (1972), The tempo of lymphocyte recirculation from blood to lymph in the rat. Cell Tissue Kinet., 5, 175–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford, W.L., Sedgley, M., Sparshott, S.M. and Smith, M.E. (1976), The migration of lymphocytes across specialized vascular endothelium. II. The contrasting consequences of treating lymphocytes with trypsin and neuraminidase. Cell Tissue Kinet., 9, 351–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerisch, G. (1968), Cell aggregation and differentiation in Dictyostelium. Current topics in developmental biology., 3, 157–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Goel, N., Campbell, R.D., Gordon, R., Rosen, R., Martinez, H. and Yeas, M. (1970), Self-sorting of isotropic cells. J. theor. Biol., 28, 23–68.Google Scholar
  33. Goel, N.S. and Leith, A.G. (1970), Self-sorting of anisotropic cells. J. theor. Biol., 28, 469–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greaves, M.F., Owen, J.J.T. and Raff, M.C. (1974), Tand B Lymphocytes: Origins, Properties and Roles in Immune Responses. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  35. Harris, A.K. (1976), Is cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis. J. theor. Biol., 61, 267–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Humphreys, T. (1963), Chemical dissolution and in vitro reconstruction of sponge cell adhesions. 1. Isolation and functional demonstration of the components involved. Dev. Biol., 8, 21–41.Google Scholar
  37. Katz, D.H. and Armerding, D. (1975), Evidence for the control of lymphocyte interactions by gene products of the I region of the H-2 complex. In: Immune Recognition. (Rosenthal, A. S., ed.), Academic Press, New York and London, pp. 727–751.Google Scholar
  38. Kondo, K. (1974), Demonstration of a reaggregation inhibitor in sea urchin embryos. Exp.Res., 86, 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kondo, K. and Sakai, H. (1971), Demonstration and preliminary characterization of reaggregation-promoting substances from embryonic sea urchin cells. Dev. Growth and Differentiation., 13, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lilien, J.E. (1968), Specific enhancement of cell aggregation in vitro Dev. Biol., 17, 657–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lilien, J.E. (1969), Toward a molecular explanation for specific cell adhesion. Current topics in Developmental Biol., 4, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lilien, J.E. and Moscona, A.A. (1967), Cell aggregation: its enhancement by a supernatant from cultures of homologous cells. Science., 175, 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McClay, D.R. (1971), An autoradiographic analysis of the species specificity during sponge cell reaggregation. Biol Bull., 141, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClay, D.R. (1974), Cell aggregation properties of cell surface factors from five species of sponge. J. exp. Zool., 188, 89–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McClay, D.R. and Hausman, R.E. (1976), Specificity of cell adhesion: differences between normal and hybrid sea urchin cells. Dev. Biol., 47, 454–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McClay, D.R. and Moscona, A.A. (1974), Purification of the specific cell-aggregating factor from embryonic neural retina cells. Exp. Cell Res., 87, 438–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McDevitt, H.O. (1975), Genetic control of immunocompetent cell interactions. In: Immune Recognition, (Rosenthal, A.S. ed.), Academic Press, New York and London, pp. 621–626.Google Scholar
  48. McGuire, E.J. and Burdick, C.L. (1976), Intercellular adhesive selectivity. 1. An improved assay for the measurement of embryonic chick intercellular adhesion (liver and other tissues). J. Cell Biol., 68, 80–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Medawar, P.B. (1944), The behaviour and fate of skin autografts and skin homografts in rabbits. J. Anat., 78, 176–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Meyer, D.B. (1964), The migration of primordial germ cells in the chick embryo. Dev. Biol., 10, 154–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moscona, A.A. (1962), Analysis of cell recombinations in experimental synthesis of tissues in vitro. J. Cell. comp. Physiol., Suppl., 60, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moscona, A.A. (1968), Aggregation of sponge cells: cell-linking macromolecules and their role in the formation of multicellular systems. In vitro., 3, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Muller, W.E.G. and Zahn, R.K. (1973), Purification and characterization of a species-specific aggregation factor in sponges. Exp. Cell Res., 80, 95–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Muller, W.E.G., Muller, I., Kurelec, B. and Zahn, R.K. (1976), Species-specific aggregation factor in sponges. IV. Inactivation of the aggregation factor by mucoid cells from another species. Exp. Cell Res., 98, 32–40.Google Scholar
  55. Muller, W.E.G., Muller, I., Zahn, R.K. and Kurelec, B. (1976), Species-specific aggregation factor in sponges. VI. Aggregation receptor from the cell surface. J. Cell Sci., 21, 227–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Neuwenhuis, C.P. and Ford, W.L. (1976), Comparative migration of B-and T-lymphocytes in the rat spleen and lymph nodes. Cell. Immunol., 23, 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pessac, B. and Defendi, V. (1972), Evidence for distinct aggregation factors and receptors in cells. Nature New Biol., 238, 13–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pielou, E.C. (1960), A single mechanism to account for regular, random and aggregated populations. J. Ecol., 48, 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Raven, C.P. (1967), The distribution of special cytoplasmic differentiations of the egg during early cleavage in Limnaea stagnalis. Dev. Biol., 16, 407–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roach, S.A. (1968), The Theory of Random Clumping. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  61. Roseman, S. (1970), The synthesis of complex carbohydrates by multiglycosyltransferase systems and their potential function in intercellular adhesion. Chem. Phys. Lipids., 5, 270–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosen, S.D., Simpson, D.L., Rose, J.E. and Barondes, S.H. (1974), Carbohydrate-binding protein from Polysphondylium pallidum implicated in intercellular adhesion. Nature 252, 128, 149–151.Google Scholar
  63. Roth, S. (1968), Studies on intercellular adhesive selectivity. Dev. Biol., 18, 602–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roth, S., McGuire, E.J. and Roseman, S. (1971), Evidence for cell-surface glycosyltransferases. Their potential role in cellular recognition J. Cell Biol., 51, 536–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roth, S.A. and Weston, J.A. (1967), The measurement of intercellular adhesion. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 58, 974–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rutishauser, U., Thiery, J.P., Brackenbury, R., Seal, B.A. and Edelman, G. (1976), Mechanisms of adhesion among cells from neural tissues of the chick embryo. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 73, 577–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sedgley, M. and Ford, W.L. (1976), The migration of lymphocytes across specialized vascular endothelium. 1. The entry of lymphocytes into the isolated mesenteric lymph-node of the rat. Cell Tissue Kin., 9, 231–243.Google Scholar
  68. Simon, D. (1957), La localisation primaire des cellules germinales dans l’embryon de poulet; preuves expérimentales. C.R. Soc. Biol. 151, 1010–1012.Google Scholar
  69. Snell, W.J. (1976a), Mating in Chlamydomonas: a system for the study of specific cell adhesion. 1. Ultrastructural and electrophoretic analyses of flagellar surface components involved in adhesion. J. Cell Biol., 68, 48–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Snell, W.J. (1976b), Mating in Chlamydomonas: a system for the study of specific cell adhesion. II. A radioactive flagella-binding assay for quantitation of adhesion. J. Cell Biol., 68, 70–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sprent, J. (1973), Circulating T and B lymphocytes of the mouse. 1. Migratory properties. Cell Immunol., 7, 10–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Steinberg, M.S. (1962a), On the mechanism of tissue reconstruction by dissociated cells. 1. Population kinetics, differential adhesiveness, and the absence of directed migration. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 48, 1577–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steinberg, M.S. (1962b), Mechanism of tissue reconstruction by dissociated cells. II. Time-course of events. Science., 137, 762–763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steinberg, M.S. (1962c), On the mechanism of tissue reconstruction by dissociated cells. III. Free energy relations and the reorganization of fused, heteronomic tissue fragments. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 48, 1769–1776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Steinberg, M.S. (1963), Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Science., 141, 401–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Steinberg, M.S. (1970), Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. J. exp. Zool., 173, 395–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Steinberg, M.S. (1975), Adhesion-guided multicellular assembly: a commentary upon the postulates, real and imagined, of the differential adhesion hypothesis, with special attention to computer simulations of cell sorting. J. theor. Biol., 55, 431–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Swift, D.L. and Friedlander, S.K. (1964), The coagulation of hydrosols by Brownian motion and laminar shear flow. J. Colloid Sci., 19, 621–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Takahashi, K. and Okada, T.S. (1971), Separation of two factors affecting the aggregation kinetics from the conditioned medium. Dev. Growth and Differentiation., 13, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Townes, P.L. and Holtfreter, J. (1955), Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J. exp. Zool., 128, 53–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turner, R.S. and Burger, M.M. (1973), Involvement of a carbohydrate group in the active site for surface guided reassociation of animal cells. Nature., 244, 509–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tuler, A. (1946), An auto-antibody concept of cell structure, growth and differentiation. Growth., 10, 7–19.Google Scholar
  83. Van De Vyver, G. (1970), La non confluence intraspecifique chez les spongiaires et la notion d’individu. Annales Embryol. Morphog., 3, 251–262.Google Scholar
  84. Van De Vyver, G. (1975), Phenomena of cellular recognition in sponges. Current Topics in Dev. Biol., 10, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Walther, B.T., Ohman, R. and Roseman, S. (1973), A quantitative assay for intercellular adhesion. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 1569–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Walther, B. Rausch, B. and Roseman, S. (1976), Sequential reactions in intercellular adhesion. J. Cell Biol., 70, 70a.Google Scholar
  87. Weinbaum, G. and Burger, M.M. (1973), Two component system for surface-guided reassociation of animal cells. Nature., 244, 510–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weiss, P. (1947), The problem of specificity in growth and development. Yale J. Biol. and Med., 19, 235–278.Google Scholar
  89. Willis, R.A. (1952), The Spread of Tumours in the Human Body. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
  90. Wolpert, L. (1969), Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. theor. Biol., 25, 1–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wood, S. (1964), Experimental studies of the intravascular dissemination of ascitic V2 carcinoma cells in the rabbit, with special reference to fibrinogen and fibrinolytic agents. Bull Swiss. Acad. Med. Sci., 20, 92–121.Google Scholar
  92. Wourms, J.P. (1972), The developmental biology of annual fishes. II. Naturally occurring dispersion and reaggregation of blastomeres during the development of annual fish eggs. J. exp. Zool., 182, 169–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zeidman, I. (1961), The fate of circulating tumor cells. I. Passage of cells through capillaries. Cancer Res., 21, 38–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. G. Curtis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations