Skip to main content

Patients’ property: loss or damage

  • Chapter
  • 203 Accesses

Abstract

Claims may be made by patients and others in respect of valuables and other belongings which have been lost or damaged on hospital premises. The legal principles applicable to these two types of situation are examined separately, given that they differ. No liability is incurred if goods which are deposited are damaged, destroyed or stolen without negligence on the part of the hospital or its staff. What is proper care depends on all the circumstances of each case. It is clear that the lowest duty that might be imposed is to look after property as if the hospital were itself the owner. In such a case, no liability would be incurred where loss was suffered through dishonesty of an employee so long as there were no grounds for suspecting wrongdoing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Houghlandv RR Lowe (Luxury Coaches) Ltd [1962] 1 QB 694 at 697-698; Morris v C W Martin and Sons Ltd [1966] 1 QB 716; and Transmotors v Robertson, Buckley [1970] 1 Ll Rep 224.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [1947] 1 All ER 783.

    Google Scholar 

  3. [1951] 2 KB 18 at 31, per Jenkins, J.

    Google Scholar 

  4. [1957] 1 WLR 415.

    Google Scholar 

  5. (1854) 3 E & B 144.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beaman v ARTS Ltd [1949] 1 KB 550 illustrates the risks of a bailee who disposes of the bailor’s property otherwise than in accordance with his authority even after a long interval of time.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See also HM(62)2, HM(71)90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See also Beaman v ARTS Ltd [1949] 1 KB 550.

    Google Scholar 

  9. This would appear to follow from Bridges v Hawksworth (1851) 21 LJ (QB) 75; Hannah v Peel [1945] KB 509.

    Google Scholar 

  10. City of London Corporation v Appleyard [1963] 1 WLR 982 and Moffatt v Kazana [1969] 2 QB 152.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See City of London Corporation v Appleyard [1963] 1 WLR 982 and the cases there referred to.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Words in brackets substituted by the Local Government Act 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Finch, J. (1994). Patients’ property: loss or damage. In: Speller’s Law Relating to Hospitals. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7122-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7122-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-41000-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7122-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics