Skip to main content

Prespecification and Plasticity in Neurogenesis

  • Chapter
Neuroembryology
  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

The concepts “prespecification” and “plasticity” are often ill-defined: to make them useful, exact criteria as well as the stage of development to which they are applied have to be stated precisely. For instance, plasticity often refers to functional adaptation. But our discussion will deal only with structural modifiability. The term “prespecification” conveys the notion that a developmental process, or phenotypic characteristics of a particular neuron strain, are irreversibly programmed or determined from an early stage on. The neural tube which gives rise to the entire central nervous system represents an early stage. One can inquire whether the undifferentiated neural tube of a 2-day chick embryo has acquired already the regional specification for cervical, brachial, thoracic, lumbar sectors which can be characterized by several criteria in later stages. One widely used test for specification is the transplantation experiment borrowed from general experimental embryology. If prospective brachial and cervical or brachial and thoracic segments are exchanged in the 2-day neural tube, they differentiate according to their site of origin, rather than the site of implantation, as shown, for instance, by the presence or absence of a lateral motor column in the transplant (B. Wenger, 1951). Another criterion would be the circuitry for coordinated limb movements which develops only at limb levels. Transplantation of the brachial neural tube to the lumbar level in 2-day chick embryos results in the performance of synchronus leg movements akin to wing flapping. Alternating movements were never observed; hence segmental specification defined by this criterion is also fixed at that stage (Narayanan and Hamburger, 1971).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Adelmann H., The problem of cyclopia, in “Quart. Rev. Biol.”, 11, 161–182, ibid. 284-304 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barondes S.H. (ed.), Neuronal Recognition, Plenum Press, New York and London (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff A., Ontogeny of leg motor output in the chick embryo: a neural analysis, in “Brain Res.”, 106, 271–291 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff A., Stein P. S. G. and Hamburger V., Coordinated motor output in the hindlimb of the 7-day chick embryo, in “Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA”, 72, 1245–1248 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M. G. M., Chen J. S. and Levi-Montalcini R., Sympathetic nerve fiber ingrowth in the central nervous system of neonatal rodents upon intracerebral NGF injections, in “Arch. Ital. Biol.”, 116, 53–84 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick F. H. C. and Lawrence P. A., Compartments and polyclones in insect development, in “Science”, 189, 340–347 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detwiler S. R., Experiments on the transplantation of the spinal cord in Amblystoma, and their bearing upon the stimuli involved in the differentiation of nerve cells, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 37, 339–393 (1923).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson B., Effect of dorsal-ventral limb rotations on the development of motor connections, in “Soc. for Neurosci.”, Abstracts, 4, 111 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb G. (ed.), Neural and Behavioral Specificity. Studies on the Development of Behavior and the Nervous System, vol. 3, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger V., Regression versus peripheral control of differentiation in motor hypoplasia, in “Am. J. Anat.”, 102, 365–410 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R. G., Experiments in transplanting limbs and their bearing upon the problems of the development of nerves, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 4, 239–281 (1907).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollyday M., Target selectivity of motor pools in chick embryos, in “Soc. for Neurosci.”, Abstracts, 4, 115 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollyday M., Motor neuron pools and their birth-dates for muscles of chick legs (in press), (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollyday M., Hamburger V. and Farris J. M. G., Localization of motor neuron pools supplying identified muscles in normal and supernumerary legs of chick embryo, in “Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA”, 74, 3582–3586 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollyday M. and Hamburger V., An autoradio graphic study of the formation of the lateral motor column in the chick embryo, in “Brain Res.”, 132, 197–208 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzer H., Reconstitution of the model spinal cord following unilateral ablation, in “J. Exp. ZooL”, 117, 523-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson C. O., Motor nuclei, cranial nerve roots, and fibre pattern in the medulla oblongata after reversal experiments on the neural plate of axolotl larvae. I. Bilateral operations, in “ZooL Bidr. från Uppsala”, 36, 73–160 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson CO., Same. II. Unilateral operations, in “Zoon”, 4, 87–100 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson M., Developmental Neurobiology, 2nd Edition, Plenum Press, New York and London (1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landmesser L., The development of motor projection patterns in the chick hindlimb, in “J. PhysioL”, 284, 391–414 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landmesser L. and Morris D. G., The development of functional innervation in the hindlimb of the chick embryo, in “J. PhysioL”, 249, 301–326 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDouarin N.M., Renard D., Teillet M.A. and LeDouarin G.H., Cholinergtc differentiation of presumptive adrenergic neuroblasts in interspecific chimaeras after heterotopic transplantation, in “Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA”, 72, 728–732 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Montalcini R., The nerve growth factor: its role in growth, differentiation and function of the sympathetic adrenergic neuron, in “Progr. in Brain Res.”, 45, 235–258 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer R. L. and Sperry R. W., Retinotectal specificity: chemoaffinity theory, in “Studies on the Development of Behavior and the Nervous System” (ed. G. Gottlieb), 3, 111–149 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan C. H. and Hamburger V., Motility in chick embryo with substitution of lumbosacral by brachial and brachial by lumbosacral spinal cord segments, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 178, 415–432 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noden D., Interactions directing the migration and cytodifferentiation of avian neural crest cells, in “Specificity of Embryological Interactions” (ed.) Dr. R. Garrod (Chapman and Hall, London), pp. 3–49 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson P. H., Environmental determination of autonomie neurotransmitter functions, in “Ann. Rev. Neurosci.”, 1, 1–17 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramon y Cajal S., A quelle époque apparaissent les expansions des cellules nerveuses de la moelle épinière du poulet?, in “Anat. Anzeiger”, 5, 609–631 (1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer A., The development of the thigh musculature of the chick, in “J. Morph.”, 43, 347–385 (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J., Cochard P. and LeDouarin N. M., Development of choline acetyltransferase and cholinesterase activities in enteric ganglia derived from presumptive adrenergic and cholinergic levels of the neural crest, in “Cell Different.”, 6, 199–216 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperry R. W., Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections, in “Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA”, 50, 703–710 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer J. L. and Spitzes N. C, Time of origin of Rohon-Beard neurons in spinal cord of Xenopus laevis, in “Am. Zool.”, 15, 575 (abstr.) (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanelli A., I fenomeni della determinazione, della regolazione e del differenziamento del sisterna nervoso, in “Atti della Accad. Naz. dei Lincei”, ser. 8, vol. 1, 27–114 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanelli A., The Mauthnerian apparatus in the Ichthyopsida: its nature and function and correlated problems of neurohistogenesis, in “Quart. Rev. Biol.”, 26, 17–34 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Lizardi and Lyser H. M., Time of origin of Mauthners neuron in Xenopus laevis embryos, in “Dev. Biol.”, 38, 220–228 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varon S. S. and Bunge R. P., Trophic mechanisms in the peripheral nervous system, in “Ann. Rev. Neurosci.”, 1, 327–361 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger B. S., Determination of structural patterns in the spinal cord of the chick embryo studied by transplantation between brachial and adjacent levels, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 116, 123–146 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamburger, V. (1990). Prespecification and Plasticity in Neurogenesis. In: Neuroembryology. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6743-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6743-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-6745-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6743-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics