Abstract
The concepts “prespecification” and “plasticity” are often ill-defined: to make them useful, exact criteria as well as the stage of development to which they are applied have to be stated precisely. For instance, plasticity often refers to functional adaptation. But our discussion will deal only with structural modifiability. The term “prespecification” conveys the notion that a developmental process, or phenotypic characteristics of a particular neuron strain, are irreversibly programmed or determined from an early stage on. The neural tube which gives rise to the entire central nervous system represents an early stage. One can inquire whether the undifferentiated neural tube of a 2-day chick embryo has acquired already the regional specification for cervical, brachial, thoracic, lumbar sectors which can be characterized by several criteria in later stages. One widely used test for specification is the transplantation experiment borrowed from general experimental embryology. If prospective brachial and cervical or brachial and thoracic segments are exchanged in the 2-day neural tube, they differentiate according to their site of origin, rather than the site of implantation, as shown, for instance, by the presence or absence of a lateral motor column in the transplant (B. Wenger, 1951). Another criterion would be the circuitry for coordinated limb movements which develops only at limb levels. Transplantation of the brachial neural tube to the lumbar level in 2-day chick embryos results in the performance of synchronus leg movements akin to wing flapping. Alternating movements were never observed; hence segmental specification defined by this criterion is also fixed at that stage (Narayanan and Hamburger, 1971).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Adelmann H., The problem of cyclopia, in “Quart. Rev. Biol.”, 11, 161–182, ibid. 284-304 (1936).
Barondes S.H. (ed.), Neuronal Recognition, Plenum Press, New York and London (1976).
Bekoff A., Ontogeny of leg motor output in the chick embryo: a neural analysis, in “Brain Res.”, 106, 271–291 (1976).
Bekoff A., Stein P. S. G. and Hamburger V., Coordinated motor output in the hindlimb of the 7-day chick embryo, in “Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA”, 72, 1245–1248 (1975).
Chen M. G. M., Chen J. S. and Levi-Montalcini R., Sympathetic nerve fiber ingrowth in the central nervous system of neonatal rodents upon intracerebral NGF injections, in “Arch. Ital. Biol.”, 116, 53–84 (1978).
Crick F. H. C. and Lawrence P. A., Compartments and polyclones in insect development, in “Science”, 189, 340–347 (1975).
Detwiler S. R., Experiments on the transplantation of the spinal cord in Amblystoma, and their bearing upon the stimuli involved in the differentiation of nerve cells, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 37, 339–393 (1923).
Ferguson B., Effect of dorsal-ventral limb rotations on the development of motor connections, in “Soc. for Neurosci.”, Abstracts, 4, 111 (1978).
Gottlieb G. (ed.), Neural and Behavioral Specificity. Studies on the Development of Behavior and the Nervous System, vol. 3, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London (1976).
Hamburger V., Regression versus peripheral control of differentiation in motor hypoplasia, in “Am. J. Anat.”, 102, 365–410 (1958).
Harrison R. G., Experiments in transplanting limbs and their bearing upon the problems of the development of nerves, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 4, 239–281 (1907).
Hollyday M., Target selectivity of motor pools in chick embryos, in “Soc. for Neurosci.”, Abstracts, 4, 115 (1978).
Hollyday M., Motor neuron pools and their birth-dates for muscles of chick legs (in press), (1979).
Hollyday M., Hamburger V. and Farris J. M. G., Localization of motor neuron pools supplying identified muscles in normal and supernumerary legs of chick embryo, in “Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA”, 74, 3582–3586 (1977).
Hollyday M. and Hamburger V., An autoradio graphic study of the formation of the lateral motor column in the chick embryo, in “Brain Res.”, 132, 197–208 (1977).
Holtzer H., Reconstitution of the model spinal cord following unilateral ablation, in “J. Exp. ZooL”, 117, 523-558.
Jacobson C. O., Motor nuclei, cranial nerve roots, and fibre pattern in the medulla oblongata after reversal experiments on the neural plate of axolotl larvae. I. Bilateral operations, in “ZooL Bidr. från Uppsala”, 36, 73–160 (1964).
Jacobson CO., Same. II. Unilateral operations, in “Zoon”, 4, 87–100 (1976).
Jacobson M., Developmental Neurobiology, 2nd Edition, Plenum Press, New York and London (1978).
Landmesser L., The development of motor projection patterns in the chick hindlimb, in “J. PhysioL”, 284, 391–414 (1978).
Landmesser L. and Morris D. G., The development of functional innervation in the hindlimb of the chick embryo, in “J. PhysioL”, 249, 301–326 (1975).
LeDouarin N.M., Renard D., Teillet M.A. and LeDouarin G.H., Cholinergtc differentiation of presumptive adrenergic neuroblasts in interspecific chimaeras after heterotopic transplantation, in “Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA”, 72, 728–732 (1975).
Levi-Montalcini R., The nerve growth factor: its role in growth, differentiation and function of the sympathetic adrenergic neuron, in “Progr. in Brain Res.”, 45, 235–258 (1976).
Meyer R. L. and Sperry R. W., Retinotectal specificity: chemoaffinity theory, in “Studies on the Development of Behavior and the Nervous System” (ed. G. Gottlieb), 3, 111–149 (1976).
Narayanan C. H. and Hamburger V., Motility in chick embryo with substitution of lumbosacral by brachial and brachial by lumbosacral spinal cord segments, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 178, 415–432 (1971).
Noden D., Interactions directing the migration and cytodifferentiation of avian neural crest cells, in “Specificity of Embryological Interactions” (ed.) Dr. R. Garrod (Chapman and Hall, London), pp. 3–49 (1978).
Patterson P. H., Environmental determination of autonomie neurotransmitter functions, in “Ann. Rev. Neurosci.”, 1, 1–17 (1978).
Ramon y Cajal S., A quelle époque apparaissent les expansions des cellules nerveuses de la moelle épinière du poulet?, in “Anat. Anzeiger”, 5, 609–631 (1890).
Romer A., The development of the thigh musculature of the chick, in “J. Morph.”, 43, 347–385 (1927).
Smith J., Cochard P. and LeDouarin N. M., Development of choline acetyltransferase and cholinesterase activities in enteric ganglia derived from presumptive adrenergic and cholinergic levels of the neural crest, in “Cell Different.”, 6, 199–216 (1977).
Sperry R. W., Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections, in “Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA”, 50, 703–710 (1963).
Spitzer J. L. and Spitzes N. C, Time of origin of Rohon-Beard neurons in spinal cord of Xenopus laevis, in “Am. Zool.”, 15, 575 (abstr.) (1975).
Stefanelli A., I fenomeni della determinazione, della regolazione e del differenziamento del sisterna nervoso, in “Atti della Accad. Naz. dei Lincei”, ser. 8, vol. 1, 27–114 (1947).
Stefanelli A., The Mauthnerian apparatus in the Ichthyopsida: its nature and function and correlated problems of neurohistogenesis, in “Quart. Rev. Biol.”, 26, 17–34 (1951).
Vargas-Lizardi and Lyser H. M., Time of origin of Mauthners neuron in Xenopus laevis embryos, in “Dev. Biol.”, 38, 220–228 (1974).
Varon S. S. and Bunge R. P., Trophic mechanisms in the peripheral nervous system, in “Ann. Rev. Neurosci.”, 1, 327–361 (1978).
Wenger B. S., Determination of structural patterns in the spinal cord of the chick embryo studied by transplantation between brachial and adjacent levels, in “J. Exp. Zool.”, 116, 123–146 (1951).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamburger, V. (1990). Prespecification and Plasticity in Neurogenesis. In: Neuroembryology. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6743-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6743-5_6
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-6745-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6743-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive