Learning and Memory Enhancement by Drugs which Indirectly Promote Cholinergic Neurotransmission

  • Harbans Lal
  • Michael J. Forster
Part of the Advances in Alzheimer Disease Therapy book series (AADT)


Brain cholinergic functions severely decline in Alzheimer (AD) patients. This conclusion is based upon many studies of biopsy samples as well as postmortem analyses of brain areas of AD patients. Alzheimer’s disease is usually characterized by marked reduction in markers of pre-synaptic cholinergic activity, including choline acetyl-transferase (ChAT), high affinity choline-uptake, and synthesis of acetylcholine (ACh). More recently, a reduction in brain content of choline was reported in cortical post-mortem samples from AD patients. Similarly, there is a correlation between AD and the tetrameric membrane bound or G4 form of acetylcholinesterase (AChE). A significant number of efforts are underway to design pharmacotherapeutic treatment of AD based upon the cholinergic deficit hypothesis. Based upon the present knowledge of the cholinergic pharmacology, several approaches are available. For example, any decline in cholinergic activity may be reversed by application of agonists of cholinergic receptors, inhibitors of AChE, agents that release ACh in the cholinergic synaptic cleft, and precursors which can be converted into choline. Not knowing for sure, which approach would be more effective, at present, all of these approaches are being researched to discover drugs which are efficacious in ameliorating AD. Whereas many of the cholinergic drugs show positive activity in the animal models of memory deficits, their efficacy in AD patients is not unimpressive and is not long lasting enough to be useful in providing a meaningful treatment of AD (for review, see Gamzu and Gracon, 1988; Retz and Lal, 1985).


Cholinergic Neuron Basal Forebrain Cholinergic System Inverse Agonist Memory Enhancement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Drachman DA and Sahakian BJ (1979): Effects of cholinergic agents on human learning and memory. In: Nutrition and Brain, Barbeau A, Growdon JH and Wurtman RJ, eds. New York: Raven Press, pp. 351–365.Google Scholar
  2. Drachman DA, Glosser G, Fleming P and Longenecker G (1982): Memory decline in the aged: treatment with lecithin and physostigmine. Neurology 32:944–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Forster MJ and Lal H (1990): Animal models of age-related dementia: neurobehavioral dysfunctions in autoimmune mice. Brain Res Bull 25:503–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forster MJ and Lal H (1991): Neurobehavioral biomarkers of aging: Influence of genotype and dietary restriction. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences (In Press).Google Scholar
  5. Forster MJ and Lal H (1991): Autoimmunity and cognitive decline in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. In: Psychoneuroimmunology, Second Edition, Ader R, Cohen N and Feiten D, eds. New York: Academic Press, pp.709–748.Google Scholar
  6. Forster MJ, Popper MD, Paul SK, Lal H and Retz C (1987): Memory for discriminated escape learning: pharmacologic enhancement and disruption. Drug Dev Res 11:97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gamzu ER and Gracon SI (1988): Drug improvement of cognition: hope and reality. Psychiat Psychobiol 3:115–123.Google Scholar
  8. Kumar BA, Forster MJ and Lal H (1988): CGS 8216, a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, enhances learning and memory in mice. Brain Res 460:195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lal H and Forster MJ (1990): Flumazenil improves active avoidance performance in aging NZB/B1NJ and C57BL/6NNia mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35:747–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lal H, Kumar BA and Forster MJ (1988): Enhancement of learning and memory in mice by a benzodiazepine antagonist. FASEB J 2:2707–2711.Google Scholar
  11. Prather PL, Forster MJ and Lal H (1991): Learning and memory enhancing effects of RO 15-4513: a comparison with flumazenil. Neuropharmacol (In Press).Google Scholar
  12. Retz KC and Lal H (1985): Cholinergic neuropsychopharmacology and neuropathology of dementias. In: Central Cholinergic Mechanisms and Adaptive Dysfunctions, Singh MM, Warburton DM and Lal H, eds. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rigdon GC and Pirch JH (1984): Microinjections of procaine or GABA into the nucleus basalis magnocellularis affects cue-elicited unit responses in the rat frontal cortex. Exp Neurol 85:283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rigdon GC and Pirch JH (1986): Nucleus basalis involvement in conditioned neuronal responses in rat frontal cortex. J Neurosci 6:2535–2542.Google Scholar
  15. Sarter M, Bruno JP and Dudchenko P (1990): Activating the damaged basal forebrain cholinergic system: tonic stimulation versus signal amplification. Psychopharmacol 101:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scheel-Kruger J (1985): New aspects on the functional role of acetylcholine in the basal ganglia system. In: Central Cholinergic Mechanisms and Adaptive Dysfunctions, Singh MM, Warburton DM and Lal H, eds. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 105–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh MM and Lal H (1982): Central cholinergic mechanisms, neuroleptic action and schizophrenia. In: Neuropharmacology: Clinical Application, Essman WB and Valzelli L, eds. New York: Spectrum Publications, pp. 337–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harbans Lal
    • 1
  • Michael J. Forster
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PharmacologyTexas College of Osteopathic MedicineFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations