Advertisement

Total (selective) gastric vagotomy

  • Haile T. Debas

Abstract

Selective gastric vagotomy was introduced in 1947 by Jackson1. Modifications of the procedure were suggested by Moore and Franksson2,3. None of these surgeons combined selective gastric vagotomy with a drainage procedure. As a result, the operation was abandoned until Griffith and Harkins demonstrated the need for a drainage procedure, first in animals in 1955, and then in man in 19604,5. Subsequently, the operation was popularized by several surgeons in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. The main benefit claimed for selective gastric vagotomy over truncal vagotomy was a marked decrease in the incidence of episodic postvagotomy diarrhoea. The most significant, prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing selective and truncal vagotomy was published by Kennedy et al. in 19736. They showed that patients undergoing selective vagotomy had less postvagotomy diarrhoea, less ulcer recurrence, and superior Visick clinical status. Based on this study and that of Harkins et al.7, the author believes that selective gastric vagotomy is superior to truncal vagotomy in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. The operation takes slightly longer to perform, however, and few surgeons have learnt to do it well. For this reason, it has not attained the same popularity as truncal vagotomy.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jackson RG. Anatomic study of the vagus nerves and technic of transabdominal selective gastric vagus resection. Univ Hosp Bulgy Ann Arbor 1947; 13: 31–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore FD. Follow-up of vagotomy in duodenal ulcer. Gastroenterology 1948; 11: 442–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franksson C. Selective abdominal vagotomy. Acta Chir Scand 1948; 96: 409–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffith CA, Harkins HN. Partial gastric vagotomy: an experimental study. Gastroenterology 1957; 32: 96–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffith CA. Gastric vagotomy vs. total abdominal vagotomy. Arch Surg 1960; 81: 781–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kennedy T, Connell AM, Love AHG, MacRae KD, Spencer EFA. Selective or truncal vagotomy? Five-year results of a double blind, randomized, controlled trial. Br J Surg 1973; 60: 944–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harkins HN, Stavney IS, Griffith CA, Savage LE, Kaj T, Nyhus LM. Selective gastric vagotomy. Ann Surg 1963; 158: 448–60.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kronborg O, Malmstrom J, Christiansen PM. A comparison between the results of truncal and selective vagotomy in patients with duodenal ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1970; 5: 519–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haile T. Debas
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations