Skip to main content

A Jury of Peers—But from an Unbiased Community

  • Chapter
  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

On November 24, 1963, just two days after the nation had been shocked by the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Americans watched in horror as Jack Ruby shot and killed accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald in a Dallas police station garage, in full view of television cameras. The world-famous attorney Melvin Belli represented Ruby at his jury trial. One of Belli’s first actions on behalf of Ruby was to try to get the trial moved out of Dallas. Belli later recounted his reasons for this in a special hearing to change the location of the trial:

Dallas was a cesspool of prejudice. Out of that pool, I argued, we couldn’t get a jury that was unbiased. How was it biased? It was my primary contention that the city of Dallas itself would be on trial as much as Jack Ruby was. Dallas had been shamed by the assassination of President Kennedy, doubly shamed by letting the President’s assassin be killed in the Dallas police station itself. And so, a Dallas jury had to convict Ruby in order to acquit Dallas.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Belli, M. M. (1976). My Life on Trial. Toronto: Popular Library.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 319.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kairys, D., Schulman, J., and Harring, S. (Eds.) (1975). The Jury System: New Methods for Reducing Prejudice. Cambridge, Mass.: National Jury Project and National Lawyers Guild.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cartwright, R. E. (1977). Jury selection. Trial, 13, 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hans, V. P. (1982a). Jury selection in two countries: A psychological perspective. Current Psychological Reviews, 2, 283–300. Hans, V. P. (1983). Unpublished data.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hans (1983), unpublished data.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hans, V. P., and Vidmar, N. (1982). Jury selection. In N. L. Kerr and R. M. Bray (Eds.) The Psychology of the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strauderv. West Virginia 100 U.S. 303 (1880); Carter v. Texas 177 U.S. 442 (1900); Norris v. Alabama 294 U.S. 587 (1935); Thiel v. Southern Pacific Company 328 U.S. 217 (1946); Patton v. Mississippi 332 U.S. 463 (1947); Hernandez v. Texas 347 U.S. 475 (1954); Whitus v. Georgia 385 U.S. 545 (1967); Carter v. Jury Comm. of Greene County 396 U.S. 320 (1970); Taylor v. Louisiana 419 U.S. 522 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cloward’s testimony is excerpted from the Seale-Huggins hearing, October 15, 1970, New Haven, Conn. (pp. 438–439 of transcript). It is quoted in Van Dyke, J. (1977). Jury Selection Procedures. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, R. (1973). Black jurors. Guild Practitioner, 30, 112–113. Quoted in Van Dyke (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gillespie, M. (1980, April). What the Miami race riots mean to all of us. Ms., p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Dyke (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hans, V. P. (1982b). Gentlewomen of the jury. Paper presented at the meeting of the Law and Society Association, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hans (1982a).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoyt v. Florida 368 U.S. 57 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  17. State v. Hall 187 So. 2d 861 (Miss), appeal dismissed 385 U.S. 98 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor v. Louisiana (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glasser v. United States 315 U.S. 60 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968, 28 U.S.C. 1861–1869. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kairys, D., Kadane, B., and Lehoczky, P. (1977). Jury representativeness: A mandate for multiple source lists. California Law Review, 65, 776–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ginger, A. F. (Ed.) (1975). Jury Selection in Criminal Trials. Tiburón, Calif.: Law Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Company (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  25. New York v. Attica Brothers, Erie County Superior Court, June 27, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  26. State of New Jersey v. Long, decided January 7, 1985. See also Report on the Atlantic County Jury Selection System, submitted to Judge Raul R. Porreca, October 30, 1984, by David Kairys, Robert Moran, and Barry Cooper.

    Google Scholar 

  27. We based our account on the Joan Little trial and related research on an excellent discussion of the role social scientists played in that trial: McConahay, J., Mullin, C, and Frederick, J. (1977). The uses of social science in trials with political and racial overtones: The trial of Joan Little. Law and Contemporary Problems, 41, 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vidmar, N., and Judson, J. (1981). The use of social science in a change of venue application. Canadian Bar Review, 59, 76–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Valerie P. Hans and Neil Vidmar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hans, V.P., Vidmar, N. (1986). A Jury of Peers—But from an Unbiased Community. In: Judging the Jury. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6463-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6463-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-42255-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6463-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics