Specific Heat of Four Rare-Earth Compounds Between 0.4° and 5°K

  • David G. Onn
  • Roland Gonano
  • Horst Meyer
Conference paper


We have measured the specific heat of lanthanum and holmium ethylsulfate (LaES and HoES) and of lutetium and gadolinium iron garnet (LuIG and GdIG) by means of a cryostat using liquid 3He or 4He. The sample, in the form of single crystals or a sintered block, is attached to a support which is made up of a quartz frame and thin copper strips in order to have a low specific heat. This support can be brought in contact with the helium refrigerator by means of a heat switch. Two carbon resistors are used: a Speer 450-Ω resistor covers the region from 0.35° to 0.9 °K, and a 40-Ω (math)W Allen-Bradley is used at higher temperatures. The resistor operating below 0.9°K is calibrated by means of the vapor pressure of liquid 3He and the susceptibility of three single crystals of cerium magnesium nitrate which obeys Curie’s law in this temperature region. The samples are cooled from room temperature entirely by means of the heat switch and without any helium exchange gas. This is to prevent adsorption of the gas on the specimen, in particular on the sintered samples, which have been found to be porous.


Heat Switch Helium Refrigerator Cerium Magnesium Nitrate Total Specific Heat Gadolinium Iron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Meyer and P. L. Smith, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 9, 296, 1959.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Orbach, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 394, 1962.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. P. Morton and H. M. Rosenberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 200, 1962.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. M. Baker and B. Bleaney, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) Ser. A 245, 156, 1958.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Grohmann, K. H. Hellwege, and H. G. Kahle, Naturwissenschaften 12, 277, 1960.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. B. Harris and H. Meyer, Phys. Rev. 127, 101, 1962.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. G. Cohen, I. Nowick, and S. Ofer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 378, 1964;ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7a.
    P. Kienle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 372, 1964.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    A. B. Harris, Phys. Rev. 132, 2398, 1963.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    G. P. Rodrigue, H. Meyer, and R. V. Jones, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 3768, 1960.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    J. I. Budnick, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 9, 464, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • David G. Onn
    • 1
  • Roland Gonano
    • 1
  • Horst Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations