Skip to main content

Structure and Operation of the Court of Justice

  • Chapter
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

Originally the Court consisted of seven Judges. Since January 1973 this has been increased to nine.1 The Court must sit with an uneven number of its members.2 If one Judge is unable to attend, the Judge most junior in office must also abstain from taking part in the deliberations of the Court.3 Several issues may be decided by a Chamber of the Court, (see below § 649, 650), but issues which may not be delegated to a Chamber cannot be validly decided by less than seven Judges.4 This is a high quorum which might easily give rise to problems if one or more judges were to fall ill for a lengthy period of time. As the Member States what their legal systems to be represented in the Court as far as is possible, a reduction in the quorum required seems inadvisable. As yet the Court has always succeeded in achieving the required quorum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Valerio Grementieri, Le statut de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes, 3 RTDE (1967), pp. 818–822.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Il Ro Suh, Voting Behaviour of National Judges in International Courts, 63 AJIL (1969), p. 228, which covers the International Court’s case law until September 1967. After that date, up to January 1975, there were six contentious cases. In none of them did a judge vote against his government’s position.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Treaty of Rome and the English Legal Professions: Proposed Solutions, 68 Law Society Gazette (1971) p. 194, but see also Valentine, The Court of Justice of the European Communities, Stevens, London 1965, Vol. I, p. 48, note 47, who suggests that solicitors could represent the British Government or the Commission, but not a private party.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Neville Brown, Les Juristes d’Outre-Manche, Etudes offertes au Professeur Jacques Lambert, Lyon 1974, p. 465. Francis G. Jacobs and Andrew Durand, References to the European Court: Practice and Procedure, Butterworths 1975 (revised reprint from Atkin’s Court Forms, Vol. 17), p. 178 which includes the text of the agreement.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Karl Wolf, Kostenrecht und Kostenpraxis des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, 11 EuR (1976), pp. 26–28; John Temple Lang, A Referral to Luxembourg: Legal Aid, 75 The Law Society’s Gazette (1978), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lisbeth Stevens, The principle of linguistic equality in judicial proceedings and in the interpretation of plurilingual legal instruments: the régime linguistic in the Court of Justice of the European Communities, 62 Northwestern University Law Review (1967) pp. 701–734.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See C.W.A. Timmermans in 26 SEW (1978), p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See B.H. Ter Kuile, Procedures over ongeldige gemeenschapsnormen, 25 SEW (1977), p. 623. See also above § 619a.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurt H. Nadelmann, Due Process of Law before the European Court of Human Rights: the Secret of Deliberation, 66 AJIL (1972) pp. 509–525; De dissenting opinion in de rechtspraak, Reports to the Netherlands Lawyers Association, NJV, by H. Drion and O. de Savornin Lohmann, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Georges Vandersanden, Le recours en tierce opposition devant la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes, 5 CDE (1969), pp. 666–682.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Liliane Plouvier, Les Décisions de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes et leurs Effets juridiques, Bruylant, Brussels 1975, pp. 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Liliane Plouvier, Le Recours en revision devant la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes, 7 CDE (1971), pp. 428–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schermers, H.G. (1979). Structure and Operation of the Court of Justice. In: Judicial Protection in the European Communities. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6098-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6098-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-268-1096-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6098-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics