Skip to main content

Ethics, Theology, and Jurisprudence

  • Chapter
  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

Jurisprudence strives to bring order to the chaos of human behavior that arises whenever two or more persons live or work within proximity—an abstract system imposed over groups, nations, and other sociological systems to the point where it is also considered sociological. Actually, jurisprudence encompasses two distinct abstract systems: ethics and law. Ethical systems address human conduct but rely only on moral suasion or peer pressure. Reliance on moral suasion usually leads to anarchy; hence, legal systems codify portions of ethical perspectives, which can be enforced by executives. Over this, we find theological systems insofar as theology prescribes ethical behavior, and, in times past, justified temporal law exercised by religious figures. No king ever matched earlier papal authority.

The precepts of the law are these: To live honorably, to injure no other man, to render every man his due.

Institutes of Justinian

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. James MacGregor Burns, Roosevelt: The Soldier of Freedom (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch, Inc., 1970), p. 601.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The advocacy of civil disobedience traces back to Cicero, St. Aquinas, and John Locke. Thoreau’s advocacy implied using it as a form of controlled revolution. Yet in almost all cases, the common theme of these writers is obedience to a superhuman moral law.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For an interesting comparison, see David B. McCall, “Profit: spur for solving social ills,” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1973, pp. 46–54, 180, and Kenneth R. Andrews, “Can the best corporations be made moral?” in the same issue, pp. 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee,Inherit the Wind (New York: Random House, 1955), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edward Tenner, Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1966), pp. 26–46, 71–94, 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The author developed this spectrum in Age of Automation: Technical Genius, Social Dilemma (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1995), pp. 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. An earlier set was Augustus Hopkins Strong, Systematic Theology (1886), in three volumes (and which is still used in some seminaries).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Will and Ariel Durant,The Age of Voltaire (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1965), pp. 787–798.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Encyclopedia of Evolution p. 399.

    Google Scholar 

  10. “Senate in Tennessee backs ‘10 Commandments’ posting,” The New York Times, February 23, 1996, p. A12 (and “Evolution measure killed,” March 29, 1996, p. A9).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. N. Da C. Andrade, “Isaac Newton” in The World of Mathematics, vol. 1, p. 274. The Archbishop at the time was the Rt. Rev. Thomas Tenison.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schenck v. US. 249 U.S. 47 (1919). Holmes wrote: “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.” The case involved the right of the government to curtail free speech in time of “clear and present danger,” i. e., the U.S. role in World War I.

    Google Scholar 

  13. With reference to Holmes’s The Common Law, see Baker, pp. 246–270.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edward W. Knappman, ed., Great American Trials (Boston: New England Publishers Association, 1994). This summarizes 200 cases, dating back to colonial times.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The deciding case was that of Dr. John Webster in 1850. Webster, a professor at Harvard, was found guilty of murder based solely on circumstantial but conclusive evidence. He was subsequently hung (Great American Trials, pp. 105–108).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Encyclopedia of Evolution p. 399.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The camp was not benign. Of 140,000 persons sent to Theresien-stadt, 88,000 were later shipped to extermination camps and 33,000 perished of malnutrition and disease. Of the 19,000 who survived, most had arrived within the last year of the war. Israel Gretman, ed., Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, vol. 4 (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1990), p. 1463.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace, Great Books of the Western World, vol. 51, p. 680.

    Google Scholar 

  19. “The other Schindlers,”U.S. News & World Report, March 21,1994, pp. 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Max Lerner, ed., The Mind and Faith of Justice Holmes (New York: Modern Library, 1943), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carl G. Jung, The Undiscovered Self, trans, by R.F.C. Hull (New York: New American Library, 1957), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Churchill in Memoriam, ed. The New York Times staff (New York: Bantam, 1965), p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 George M. Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, G.M. (1997). Ethics, Theology, and Jurisprudence. In: The Ingenious Mind of Nature. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6020-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6020-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45571-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6020-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics