The Next Generation of Nuclear Power Plants

  • Bernard L. Cohen


The nuclear power plants in service today were conceptually designed and developed during the 1960s. At that time, it was deemed necessary to achieve maximum efficiency and minimum cost in order to compete successfully with coal- or oil-burning plants. The latter were priced at 15% of their present cost and used fuel that was very cheap by current standards. In order to maximize efficiencies in the nuclear plants, temperatures, pressures, and power densities were pushed up to their highest practical limits. Safety features were exemplary for that era, and even for current safety practices in other industries. But they were not up to present-day demands for super-super safety in the nuclear industry.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. J. Taylor, “Improved and Safer Nuclear Power” Science, 244, 318(April 21, 1989 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. J. Taylor, K. E. Stahlkopf, D. M. Noble, and G. J. Dau, “LWR Development in the U.S.A.,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 109, 19 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Catron, “New Interest in Passive Reactor Designs,” EPRI Journal, 14, 3, 4 (April 1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Livingston, “The Next Generation,” Nuclear Industry (July 1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. E. Stahlkopf, J. C. DeVine, and W. R. Sugnet, “U.S. ALWR Programme Sets Out Utility Requirements for the Future,” Nuclear Engineering International (November 1988), p. 16.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Vijuk and H. Bruschi, “AP-600 Offers a Simpler Way to Greater Safety, Operability, and Maintainability,” Nuclear Engineering International (November 1988), p. 22.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Hannerz, “Applying PIUS to Power Generation,” Nuclear Engineering International (December 1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Hannerz, “Making Progress on PIUS Design and Verification,” Nuclear Engineering International (November 1988), p. 29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nuclear Power: The New Generation,“ IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Bulletin, 331, No. 3 (entire issue) (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edison Electric Institute, Statistical Yearbook of the Electrical Utility Industry, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. Energy Information Agency, “Historical Plant Cost and Annual Production Expenses for Selected Electricity Generating Plants,” DOE/EIA-0455 (1987).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    U.S. Department of Energy, “Nuclear Energy Cost Data Base,” DOE/NE-0095 (September 1988).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Study Group of the Committee on Financial Considerations, “A Comparison of the Future Costs of Nuclear and Coal-Fired Electricity, An Update,” U.S. Council for Energy Awareness (1987).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nuclear News (July 1982), p. 48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bernard L. Cohen 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard L. Cohen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations