Advertisement

Spectrometer Cavities

  • T. H. Wilmshurst
Part of the Monographs on Electron Spin Resonance book series (MESR)

Abstract

In Chapter 2 it is shown that the effect of placing a sample exhibiting E.S.R. in the cavity of an E.S.R. spectrometer is to couple an effective spin-generator in series with the equivalent circuit of the cavity. For an unsaturable sample, the criterion of sensitivity for the cavity is that the available power from the spin-generator should be as high as possible for a given power dissipated in the cavity by the klystron. In this chapter the corresponding criterion for saturable samples is deduced. Both criteria are then expressed mathematically and considered in some detail for various types of sample. In particular, the effect of the frequency of operation and the limitations to sample size imposed by the inhomogeneity of the magnet are taken into consideration. The chapter includes a short account of the practical considerations of spectrometer cavity design, and concludes with a somewhat speculative consideration of the possible replacement of the cavity by a slow-wave structure.

Keywords

Dielectric Loss Cavity Wall Planar Node Rectangular Cavity Saturable Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramo, S., and Whinnery, J.R., Fields and Waves in Modern Radio (Wiley, 1953).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bjorken, J.D., and Bitter, F., Rev. sci. Instrum., 1956, 27, 1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett, R.G., Hoell, P.C., and Schwenker, R.P., Rev. sci. Instrum., 1958, 29, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chester, P.F., Wagner, P.E., Castle, J.G., and Conn, G., Rev. sci. Instrum., 1959, 30, 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Firth, I.M., J. sci. Instrum., 1962, 39, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamb, J., and Ager, R., Rev. sci. Instrum., 1959, 30, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook, A.R., Mataresse, L.M., and Wells, J.S., Rev. sci. Instrum., 1963, 35, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gordon, J.P., Rev. sei. Instrum., 1961, 32, 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ager, R., Cole, T., and Lamb, J., Rev. sei. Instrum., 1963, 34. 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Faulkner, E.A., and Holman, A., J. sei. Instrum., 1963, 40, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stoodley, L.G., J. Electr. Cont., 1962, 14, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feher, G., Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1957, 36, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cook, R.F., and Stoodley, L.G., Inst. J. of Radiation Biology, 1963, 7, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kent, M., and Mallard, J.R., J. sei. Instrum., 1965, 42, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siegman, A.E., Microwave Solid-State Masers (McGraw Hill, 1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T. H. Wilmshurst 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. H. Wilmshurst
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations