Abstract
Felix Klein [1] once said that the concept of group is perhaps the most characteristic concept of 19th century mathematics. However, in his Erlangen Program (1872), an extraordinarily effective advertisement for the group concept, Klein does not make any attempt to “sell” it to the natural scientists. At that time he was probably too absorbed with geometry to think of other applications, but already a few years later his friend and one-time collaborator, Sophus Lie, in the preface to the third part of his celebrated “Theorie der Transformationsgruppen” wrote “The principles of mechanics have a group theoretic origin”. Soon afterwards, in 1904, this was explicitly proved by G. Hamel [2]. Little by little under the influence of Klein and of his school it began to be recognized that invariance under the group of the automorphisms of space-time was the true criterion of objectivity for the physical laws. Already in 1910 Klein [3] explicitly stated that relativity was synonymous with invariance under a group and Klein’s school systematically investigated the physical consequences of invariance under both finite and infinite dimensional Lie groups [4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Quoted by H. Weyl; Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, Leipzig 1931, 2nd ed., p. 2; see also H. Weyl, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton, 1952, p. 28.
G. Hamel, Die Lagrange-Eulerschen Gleichungen der Mechanik, Zeit. f. Math. u. Physik., 50 (1904) 1.
F. Klein, Über die geometrischen Gründlagen der Lorentzgruppe, Jahresberichte der Deutschen Mathematikervereinigung, 19 (1910); reprinted in F. Klein, Gesammelte Mathematische Abhandlungen I, p. 553, Berlin, 1921.
B. Herglotz, Mechanik der deformierbaren Körpers vom Standpunkte der Relativitätstheorie, Ann. d. Physik, 36 (1911) 493; F. Engel, Uber die zehn allgemeine Integrale der klassischen Mechanik, Nachrichten d. kön. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Göttingen 70 (1916); F. Klein, Uber die Differentialgesetze für die Erhaltung von Impuls und Energie in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie, ibid., 171 (1918); Uber der Integralform der Erhaltungssätze und die Theorie der Räumlich-geschlossen Welt, ibid., 394 (1919); E. Noether, Invariante beliebiger Differentialausdrücke, ibid., 1918 p. 37.
E. Wigner, Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren, Braunschweig 1931.
H. Weyl, Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, Leipzig 1928.
C. N. Yang and R. L. Mills, Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 191.
J. Goldstone, Field Theories with superconductor solutions, N. Cimento, 19 (1961) 154
Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on analogy with superconductivity I. and IL, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345 and 129 (1961) 246; W. Heisenberg, Introduction to the unified field theory of elementary particles, London, 1966, where references to early papers can be found
F. Gürsey, On the symmetries of strong and weak interactions, N. Cimento, 16 (1960) 230.
E. Wigner, On the consequencees of the symmetry of the Nuclear Hamiltonian on the spectroscopy of Nuclei, Phys. Rev. 51 (1937) 106
B. H. Flowers, Studies in j-j coupling, I. Classification of nuclear and atomic states, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 212, (1952) 248
J. P. Elliot, Collective motions in the nuclear shell model. I. Classification schemes for states of mixed configurations, ibid., 245 (1958) 129.
M. Gell-Mann, Symmetries of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) 1067, 1084
Y. Ne’eman, Derivation of Strong Interactions from Gauge Invariance, Nuclear Physics, 26 (1961) 222
F. Gürsey and L. A. Radicati, Spin and Unitary Spin Independence of Strong Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 173
B. Sakita, Supermultiplets of Elementary Particles, Phys. Rev. B1756 (1964) 136.
S. Weinberg, A model of leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264; Abdus Salam, in: Elementary Particle Theory, N. Svartholm Ed., p. 367, Stockholm 1968
J. Bjorken and S. L. Glashow, Baryon Resonances in W 3 symmetry, Phys. Lett. 11 (1964) 84
S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak Interactions with Lepton-Hadron Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D2 (1970) 1285.
P. W. Anderson, Random Phase Approximation in the Theory of Superconductivity, Phys Rev. 112 (1958) 1900; see also P. W. Anderson, Concepts in Solids, New York, 1963, 1975; J. Goldstone, Field Theories with Superconductor Solutions, N. Cimento, 19 (1961) 154; see also
B. D. Josephson, The discovery of tunneling Superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46 (1974) 251. The earliest application to the fundamental interactions is probably
J. Goldstone, Abdus Salam, S. Weinberg, Broken Symmetries, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 965. The application to gauge theories was first given by
P. H. Higgs, Broken Symmetries, Massless Particles and Gauge Fields, Phys. Letters 12 (1964) 132.
Hesiodus, Theogonia, 115, 123.
S. Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium, New Haven, 1969. This book contains extensive references to previous works on the subject.
H. Bénard, Les Tourbillons cellulaires dans une nappe liquide, Revue Générale des Sciences Pures et Appliquées, 11 (1900) 1261 and 1309. See also
Lord Rayleigh, On Convective Currents in a Horizontal Layer of Fluid when the higher Temperature is on the Under Side, Phil. Mag. 32 (1916) 529.
E. L. Koschmieder, On convection on a uniformly heated plane, Beitr. Phys. Atmos., 39 (1965) 1.
J. Wesfreid, Y. Pomeau, M. Dubois, C. Normand, P. Bergé, Critical Effects in Rayleigh-Bénard convection, J. de Phys., 7 (1978) 725.
F. Busse, The Stability of finite amplitude cellular convection and its relation to an extremum principle, J. Fluid Mech., 30 (1967) 625.
D. H. Sattinger, Bifurcations and Symmetry Breaking in Applied Mathematics, Bull. Math. Soc. 3 (1980) 779.
P. Curie, Sur la Symétrie dans les phénomènes physiques. Symétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique, Journal de Physique 3me Série 3, (1894) 393.
D. H. Constantinescu, L. Michel and L. A. Radicati, Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking from the Maclaurin and the Jacobi sequences, Journal de Physique, 40 (1979) 147.
D. H. Sattinger, Group representaion theory, bifurcation theory and pattern formation, J. Functional Anal., 28 (1978) 58.
L. Michel and L. A. Radicati, The geometry of the octet, Ann. Inst. Henry Poincaré Sect. A, 18 (1973) 185. Properties of the Breaking of Hadronic Internal Symmetry, Ann. of Physics, 66 (1971) 758.
E. Cartan, Lecons sur la géométrie des espaces de Riemann, Paris 1946; see also M. F. Atiyah, Geometry of Yang-Mills Fields, Pisa 1979.
H. Weyl, Space, Time and Matter, New York, 1952, p. 220.
E. Wigner, The unreasonable effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences, Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13 1960 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Radicati di Brozolo, L.A. (1984). Chaos and Cosmos. In: Bars, I., Chodos, A., Tze, CH. (eds) Symmetries in Particle Physics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5313-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5313-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-5315-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-5313-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive