Advertisement

Principles of doing research

  • Janice M. Morse
  • Peggy Anne Field

Abstract

Once the proposal is approved, and institutional approvals and funding have been obtained, the actual research can start. Beginning researchers (and even the more experienced embarking on a new project) report that starting is a very stressful time, and that knocking on the door of the first participant was the most difficult thing they had ever done. This difficulty may arise from the lack of structure in the qualitative research process, which leaves the researcher feeling that a lot could possibly go wrong (for example, that a prospective participant will refuse to enter the study). On the other hand, if participant observation is a part of the design, there is the awkwardness of not knowing ‘what to do’ or how to fit into the research setting.

Keywords

Qualitative Research Public Health Nurse American Anthropological Association Informal Leader Suspected Child Abuse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowen, E.S. (1964) Return to Laughter, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Douglas, J.D. (1976) Investigative Social Research: Individual and Team Research, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  3. Field, P.A. (1983) An ethnography: four public health nurses’ perspectives of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 8, 3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Germain, C. (1979) The Cancer Unit: An Ethnography, Nursing Resources, Wakefield, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Golde, P. (ed.) (1970) Women in the Field: Anthropological Experiences, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Gregory, J.R. (1984) The myth of the male ethnographer and the woman’s world. Journal of the American Anthropological Association, 86(2), 316–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hupcey, J. and Morse, J.M. (in press) Family and social support: application to the critically ill patient, Journal of Family Nursing.Google Scholar
  8. Kaufman, K.S. (1994) The insider-outsider dilemma: field experience of a White researcher ‘getting in’ a poor Black community. Nursing Research, 43(3), 179–83.Google Scholar
  9. Kratz, C. (1975) Participant observation in dyadic and triadic situations. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 12(3), 169–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipson, J. (1991) The use of self in ethnographic research, in Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue, rev. edn, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 73–89.Google Scholar
  11. Miles, MB. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Morse, J.M. (1986) Qualitative research: issues in sampling, in Nursing Research Methodology, (ed. P.L. Chinn), Aspen, Rockville, MD, pp. 181–93.Google Scholar
  13. Morse, J.M. (1989/1991) Strategies for sampling, in Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue, rev. edn, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 127–45.Google Scholar
  14. Morse, J.M. (1991/92) The structure and function of gift-giving in the patient-nurse relationship, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 236–56.Google Scholar
  15. Morse, J.M. (1992) Comfort: the refocusing of nursing care. Clinical Nursing Research, 1, 91–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Watson, L., Irwin, J. and Michalske, S. (1991) Researcher as friend: methods of the interviewer in a longitudinal study. Qualitative Health Research, 1, 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wax, R.H. (1971) Doing Fieldwork: Warnings and Advice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Aquilar, J.L. (1981) Insider research: an ethnography of debate, in Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One’s Own Society, (ed. D.A. Messerschmidt), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
  2. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994) Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research, in Handbook of Qualitative Research (eds N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. Field, P.A. (1991) Doing fieldwork in your own culture, in Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue, rev. edn, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
  4. Freilich, M. (ed.) (1977) Marginal Natives at Work, Schenkman, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Hinds, P.H., Chaves, D.E. and Cypess, S.M. (1992) Context as a source of meaning and understanding, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 3142–256.Google Scholar
  6. Punch, M. (1986) The Politics and Ethics of Fieldwork, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Reason, P. (ed.) (1988) Human Inquiry in Action, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  8. Van Maanen, J. (1988) Tales of the Field, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Janice M. Morse and Peggy Anne Field 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janice M. Morse
    • 1
  • Peggy Anne Field
    • 2
  1. 1.School of NursingPennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of NursingUniversity of AlbertaCanada

Personalised recommendations